I like the way you quantify this. Either Apple was hiring the best candidates before the implemented changes, or they are hiring the best candidates now.
I wonder which it is. I hope it's the latter - that they are moving away from bad hiring practices.
I'd think of it as before they were hiring the best individuals, now they are hiring the best team.
Classic reflection. I know many who have survived being passed over for promotion and advancement due to an agenda that placed merit as secondary.
That has been true since the beginning of time.
Technology is an up or out business. While ageism has always been an issue in tech, the argument of senior employees not adapting to new technologies and methodologies is quite valid.
While obviously you have to keep up with technology to an extent, much in technology hasn't improved as much as you'd like whether you're using FORTRAN or Node.js.
Why does it matter? Have you ever asked men why they don't pursue degrees in nursing, education, french poetry, social work, psychology, etc...? Equality in outcome is not the same as equality in opportunity. Perhaps we should discuss why you think women's current education and career choices shouldn't be respected...
Well we absolutely need to address those things, the lack of male primary school teachers means that young boys don't have strong male role models - especially those with only a single mother. The same applies to a more acute degree with social workers.
Probably male nurses will do a better job with older male patients who might be more comfortable being looked after medically by a man.