Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
macrumors12345 said:
The Radeon 9550 will not "compete well with Intel 900GMA" graphics - it will completely DESTROY Intel 900GMA graphics.

I'd edit this to the 9550 with 128mb ram would destroy Intel GMA900. A 9550 with only 32mb RAM would have much more trouble. Meanwhile, the intel 900, newer 950 and ATI Xpress200m integrated graphics systems can use the much faster pci-e bus for up to 256mb of graphics ram. I'm not really sure which would win, but I think they'd all be in the too-slow-so-who-really-cares-about-the-numbers level of performance.
 
Trowaman said:
as to your analogy:

1. Open Mouth.
2. Insert Foot.

Watch what you type before you call someone an idiot ;)


yeah and don't you forget it! thanks guys =)
 
Mood said:
widescreen isn't that hard, nor is superdrive, nor is 64 megs of video ram, nor is dual display/resizing resolutions, dvi, etc.
No it's not hard. Stop the f...udgeing whining and get a PowerBook. The iBook is Apples low-end consumers laptop... :rolleyes:
 
Chrispy said:
For me, my work prefers I work with PC anyways so I'm just gonna go that route for awhile... but when the Intel machines come out, Apple here I come!!!

Fair enough - for some ppl every last bit of CPU speed is important. But don't contribute to the FUD about GPUs, etc.
 
well, I had sold my slow but trusty ibook g3 800 mhz in hopes of getting something better, and i waited and waited.... in the end I went for the Dell 700m. yes, Xp isnt as nice as osx, but i got a lot more decent hardware for less money than in this new very basic updated ibook. $820 with an extra battery and 60 gig 5400 rpm hard drive and dual layer dvd burner. Ill get another ibook maybe after the intel transition.
 
macrumors12345 said:
The GMA 900 gets chewed up, spit out, reingested, and regurgitated by the POS Radeon X300 family. (the X300 falls around the Rad 9200 in terms of performance...standard X300 > 9200 > X300 SE; for example, check out http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/powercolor-x300se_6.html )

The X300 is the pci-e version of the radeon 9600, a step up from the 9200, but not really that huge in performance. The pixel shader 2.0 features are a bigger deal. The x300SE has the same core/mem clocks but only a 64-bit bus.
 
QCassidy352 said:
Depends on what you want to do, I guess. Enough for Doom 3 with reasonable framerates? No. Enough for World of Warcraft with reasonable framerates? Yes. Enough for a non-gamer just using the graphical features of the OS and other common applications? Easily.

I meant enough to support Core Graphics. I thought the minimum was 64.
 
Mood said:
i would pay more for an ibook over a powerbook if it had the same features just because i like the design and the batteyr life and the high wi-fi range.

widescreen isn't that hard, nor is superdrive, nor is 64 megs of video ram, nor is dual display/resizing resolutions, dvi, etc.

You aren't making any sense there. You're another one trying to get a 12" PowerBook for $200 less. If you want those features then get a PowerBook, not an iBook. I don't believe the iBook has any better battery life than the PowerBook. If there is, its marginal. SuperDrives are avaliable in an iBook, so I don't know what you're trying to get at there.....
 
Can anyone give me an idea of the performance to expect with a new iBook and say the full 1.5 GB RAM for use with a TV Tuner card, which i'm assuming would have to be either firewire or USB 2.0 input. I know it'd be crap on my current G3 iBook but it's something i'd definitely be using with my new laptop and would make a difference between the iBook and 15" 1.67 PowerBook w/ 128MB VRAM........ and could that PB handle Doom3 and upcoming games?
 
How do I get one fast?

I'm going to get one. My local dealer said he wont be able to get hold of one for 2 weeks. Somebody on the previous page asked when Amazon usually gets new 'books-- does anyone know? I'm 3 hours from the nearest Apple Store. Do the Apple stores have these today?
 
rosalindavenue said:
I'm going to get one. My local dealer said he wont be able to get hold of one for 2 weeks. Somebody on the previous page asked when Amazon usually gets new 'books-- does anyone know? I'm 3 hours from the nearest Apple Store. Do the Apple stores have these today?

I think you can call the nearest Apple Retail Store and see. I would think they would have them in stock right now.
 
rosalindavenue said:
I'm going to get one. My local dealer said he wont be able to get hold of one for 2 weeks. Somebody on the previous page asked when Amazon usually gets new 'books-- does anyone know? I'm 3 hours from the nearest Apple Store. Do the Apple stores have these today?

Called my nearest Apple store and they say they don't have them yet. Wanted to see how much better they perform compared to PBs. Apple online still says 3-5 business days. I'm guessing Amazon won't get them for at least 1-2 weeks since Apple would supply their stores first.

If you want one fast, order from Apple online.
 
KindredMAC said:
what a *****@ss update!!!!!!
9 frickin months and no widescreen!!!!!
BAH! WHO NEEDS RUMORS! THEY DO NOTHING BUT CAUSE DISAPPOINTMENT WHEN THE BORINGNESS OF REALITY HITS!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm going to go take a strap to my back in the bathroom here at work for actually getting excited about this rumor....
STUPID! STUPID! HOW COULD I BE SUCH A SHEEP!!!!!!!!!!!!
Could not agree with you more!

Aside ftom the 'widescreen pipedream,' I was really hoping for a iBook Mini (of sorts) under $999 - silly me!


Ultimatetone
 
Ultimatetone said:
Could not agree with you more!

Aside ftom the 'widescreen pipedream,' I was really hoping for a iBook Mini (of sorts) under $999 - silly me!


Ultimatetone

This is why you shouldn't read rumor sites. All they do is set people up for disappointments. Apple never said this would be a huge update. Quit whining people, jesus!
 
0092762 said:
I'd have to disagree with you...

The Dell 700m is approx $800 (Dell posts a 750 off 1499 coupon every two weeks, my friend bought one like that) and it has:

+ 12.1 Widescreen, way better than the 12" ibook or powerbook
+ Pentium M 1.8 GHZ which again destroys any G4, ever...
+ A DVD burner you can't even get in a 12" ibook
+ Better battery life
+ 512 mb of way faster memory, and system bus...
+ 4.1 lbs
+ SD card reader, which is actually very useful with a digital camera

- Integrated graphics (curiously fast enough to play games like nfs underground)
- No Bluetooth
- Cheaper design, but still nice, and way better than dells of a year ago, i'd be perfectly happy with it
- Windows (this is the deal breaker for me and why i'm not buying it right now)

The shock sensor and scrolling trackpad are just gimmicks imo, not that important to warrant mention.

You can disagree, but stick with the facts instead of the FUD:

$750 off $1499 every two weeks: Wrong. If you search the dealnews archives for the last couple months you'll see it is usually $600 off $1499, when it's available at all. So really you are talking almost $1000 (since it's hard to hit $1501 with stuff you actually want).

12.1" widescreen: Right/wrong. Definitely higher resolution - that is good. But it is a high glare screen (hint: they call it "Crystal-Clear"), so the brightness comes at the expense of glare. For many of us, that is an unacceptable tradeoff.

P-M 1.8: Agreed, definitely faster.

DVD burner: Fair enough (I don't need it because I have one in my desktop, but some people might).

Better battery life: Wrong. The stock battery is a crippled low capacity one.

Way faster memory/faster bus: Right about the bus, wrong about the memory. iBooks actually ship with DDR333 memory, which is up to spec. But the FSB is too slow to take full advantage of it.

4.1 lb weight: Right/wrong. With the stock battery it's 4.1 lbs, but with a normal battery it will be around 4.5 lbs. Which is still lighter than the iBook (though that is primarily because the build quality is weaker).

SD card reader: Sure. (again, I have no use for it, but some might)

You are right about integrated graphics (which will kill you on Longhorn/Vista), cheap build quality, no BT (which I definitely want, and a dongle is just asking to be broken off), and Windows.

I don't consider SMS to be a gimmick, esp not on the iBook (which has a strong external frame, and now has internal protection to match). I take good care of my laptops, but I've still dropped my current iBook at least once in the past 6 months...fortunately it was from low enough that nothing was damaged. Now I'll have more peace of mind. But maybe you never drop your laptop, or don't care whether it breaks if you. I have no idea.

Scrolling trackpad is definitely NOT a gimmick. I have iScroll 2 on my iBook 1.2, and I literally found it frustrating to use my gf's 15" Powerbook (1.25 Ghz model) until I installed it on hers too. Yes, her machine had bigger, brighter, wide-screen, higher res 15" display, but I honestly found it aggrevating to use until I installed iScroll 2. It's just one of those things that you don't realize you need until after you've started using it.

Anyway, you are batting about 9/14, i.e. around 65%. Not so bad.

Now, I'm not saying that the Inspiron 700M is not good hardware value for money - on the contrary, for the needs of some people, I think it is a very good value (though I must admit that the fact that it is sized for portability but doesn't have the build quality to stand up to being carried everywhere is a pretty big flaw). However, it is just FUD to claim that it is better than the iBook (hardware wise) along almost every dimension, which you seem to be doing.

Incidentally, I have a friend who has owned a lot of Dells. He used to be a Mac user back in the System 8.x days, but he has just been using Windows for years now (basically, he "switched" when his friend gave him an Athlon for free). All other things being equal, he would prefer OS X, but he is very concerned about value for money in hardware. He asked me about the (1.2 Ghz) iBook, and I honestly told him that the 600M or 700M was more hardware per dollar. But he has no interest in buying the Inspirons, because he wants to carry it around everywhere, and he knows from experience that Inspiron build quality ranges from mediocre to crappy (and many reviews seem to agree). He was interested in the Latitude D610, but at $1200-1300 for equivalent specs to the $1000 600M, it does not represent a lot of hardware per dollar. So now he is planning to buy the new iBook, because it has OS X, good build quality, and beats the D610 in terms of hardware per dollar. (the D610 has better overall hardware, but he is going to use the iPod deal to effectively get the iBook for $800, and it is quite clear that the D610 does not offer 50% more hardware for the extra 50% cost...in fact, some things on the D610 are actually slower, like the graphics chip).
 
macrumors12345 said:
Yes, clearly the iBook is in the same class as a giant, bulky 8.5 pound notebook. Not only does it beat it in the CPU speed and screen size departments, but it completely thrashes it in the weight and size departments (more is always better, right??). Try comparing similar products next time, and by all means go run off and buy your Dell.

why does his buying an inspiron 9300 appear to offend you? it's his decision, you shouldn't be a jerk about what he wants to do with his money.

in terms of price, the inspiron 9300 and ibook are in line with each other. the inspiron 9300 and ibook are very similar in that regard. there's no point in taking being so defensive about apple in this case, IMO the ibooks are shamefully expensive for what you get. compare it to the 700m, ok? is that "fair" enough for you? or the 600m, boy, that whoops the ibook!

the only thing holding the ibook line together is people who just want a simple, cool looking computer who do not care about speed and people who want Mac OS X and don't want to spend more money for a powerbook (like me :) going to order it tomorrow, probably).
 
enginerd said:
I'd edit this to the 9550 with 128mb ram would destroy Intel GMA900. A 9550 with only 32mb RAM would have much more trouble. Meanwhile, the intel 900, newer 950 and ATI Xpress200m integrated graphics systems can use the much faster pci-e bus for up to 256mb of graphics ram. I'm not really sure which would win, but I think they'd all be in the too-slow-so-who-really-cares-about-the-numbers level of performance.

VRAM is more important for gaming at higher resolutions. In most cases, for obvious reasons, the iBook is limited to 1024x768. 32 MB of VRAM is not going to kill gaming performance on the iBook.
 
mklos said:
You aren't making any sense there. You're another one trying to get a 12" PowerBook for $200 less. If you want those features then get a PowerBook, not an iBook. I don't believe the iBook has any better battery life than the PowerBook. If there is, its marginal. SuperDrives are avaliable in an iBook, so I don't know what you're trying to get at there.....


450 dollars less after taxes
 
macrumors12345 said:
They get all wrapped up in rumors from ever-so-credible sources like digitimes,
and then when Apple doesn't deliver a 3 Ghz notebook with a 20" screen that weighs 2.5 pounds, priced at $99.99, they go nuts.
Happens every time - it's just a function of the type of people attracted to these sites
(look at their predictions/hopes beforehand...they're insanely optimistic, so they get completely disappointed when reality actually hits).

How dare Apple actually charge enough for the hardware to recoup its software R&D costs and make some profit!!!
I want them to sell me stuff at a loss!
Not a completely foreign concept.

I've seen it done to ridiculous levels in the earlier cellular days.

Not dissimilar to the drug pusher who provides 'free' samples to get you 'hooked,'
Apple could have introduced an iBook Mini (for under 650.00, perhaps at a loss, too) to get fence-riders hooked into OS X.

With the battery recalls and screen issues of a few Apple notebooks in the past,
this makes a case against a potential 'switcher' opting to go for a pre-owned Apple notebook.

Seems more cost effective to go for a linux distro on an intel or AMD-based notebook these days.

So, it's either -

research notebooks with linux or
research suitable pre-owned Apple notebooks.

Has anyone created a truly portable Mac Mini (with battery pack and screen?)

I am very excited to see future Apple notebooks with Intel inside...maybe then I'll have the money to get one, too.

Really sucks being a long-time Apple fan (and Nextel customer) as well.
Always waiting for the hardware/features to catch-up with the rest, it seems.


Ultimatetone
 
mklos said:
SuperDrives are avaliable in an iBook, so I don't know what you're trying to get at there.....

I think he is referring to the 12" iBook (where it is not BTO)?

Of course, half the stuff he claims should be trivial to add (64 MB VRAM, DVI, etc) isn't available in the Dell 700M either, but we'll ignore that minor detail. I guess all the laptop manufacturers are just idiotically not including every single feature under the sun in sub-$1000...what nerve they have!
 
Why does every keep dissing the 1024x768 XGA resolution? Do you know how many PC laptops still ship with this resolution on 14" and 15" screens? Tons. My sister's Dell Inspiron 5150 goes up to 1600x1200 on the 15.4" screen. Guess what resolution she keeps it set at? You guessed it 1024x768. Unless you are doing photo editting, video, multiple things at once, this resolution is excellent for Laptops for every day things.
 
I'm in Pa. and obviously there's tax at apple stores here, and on apple online. I need to buy one asap so I figure I'll just go down to Delaware where it's tax free. Does the free ipod mini with an apple laptop deal available in stores only? Or is it only for online?
 
v idioteque v said:
I'm in Pa. and obviously there's tax at apple stores here, and on apple online. I need to buy one asap so I figure I'll just go down to Delaware where it's tax free. Does the free ipod mini with an apple laptop deal available in stores only? Or is it only for online?

Available in-store and on-line
 
that makes sense...

James L said:
Yup, and the people who believed and spread the rumors.
The process is pretty simple:
1) Apple doesn't say a thing about an update.
2) Rumors get started somewhere.
3) People who should know better perpetuate the rumor.
4) People continue to perpetuate the rumor, adding in here and there.
5) Rumor perpetuating continues.
6) Apple releases new product, that doesn't match rumored product (and they never said it would).
7) People whine.
8) People whine.
9) People whine.

Then, there is a lull, and then the whole process starts up again with a different product.
Widescreen here is a classic example. Apple NEVER said that they were moving the iBook to widescreen. Some idiot started a rumor that they were. Now that it hasn't happened, people feel let down. They should feel let down, but with themselves for getting so hyped up, not with anyone else.

The only time I have heard valid whining recently is when SJ promised 3Ghz and then couldn't deliver.


That could be the smartest post I've read after on a new product forum for quite some time. It's actually a ridiculous cycle that some people are in - people who will never be satisfied with any upgrade to any any product.

If you actually compare specs to what was offered yesterday to what is offered today - it's actually fairly impressive.

The only dissapoinment I see is still no Superdrive on a 12", that would be great.

IMO, we won't see a widescreen ibook for a while though, here's hoping.

As someone who uses OS X and XP both on a daily basis, you can load up any PC laptop with specs, I'd much rather have an ibook that people feel is a dissappointing update. (6 restarts to install Norton 2005, thanks, XP).
 
wide said:
why does his buying an inspiron 9300 appear to offend you? it's his decision, you shouldn't be a jerk about what he wants to do with his money.

Huh? I said at the end, "by all means, go run off and buy your Dell." If that what meets his needs, then clearly he should get. What I'm "being a jerk about" is his absurd comparison between the iBook (incidentally, I would personally never consider the 14" XGA model, but apparently lots of ppl on both Windows and Mac still want 14-15" XGA screens) and the giant Dell. You pay a significant premium for smaller size and less weight - duh. It is almost as ridiculous as me claiming that if I combine a Mac Mini with my 17" Hitachi LCD, then I will have something equivalent to a 17" Powerbook at 1/3rd the price. (hey, don't knock it, the Hitachi isn't that heavy...I COULD carry it around with the ultra-compact Mini if I really wanted to)

Now, if you want a "desktop replacement" type notebook, and want to complain that Apple doesn't offer one, then that is valid. But don't argue that the iBook is bad because it's not in the category you're looking for. That would be like saying you shouldn't buy a Dell Server because it's pathetic compared to an IBM Power5 based server. Well, yes, of course it is, because it's in a completely different class. If what you need is a lightweight server, then the Dell is fine. If you need some big iron, then the IBM is fine. But don't fault Dell's other products just because they don't ship big iron servers.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.