Of course it is an Apple distinction and to keep that distinction they're not going to put the newest tech in what they consider to be a consumer product.
Since when? The iMacs had Intel processors before Power Mac/Mac Pro did.
Of course it is an Apple distinction and to keep that distinction they're not going to put the newest tech in what they consider to be a consumer product.
You didn't find out about an update until yesterday, so don't even bother with that. I think you'll find out the MR regulars think this update is a decent one.
MUCH worse. Intel's GMA 950 is a Direct X 6 part, circa early 1999.
Well, it doesn't much matter how you see the intended audience: the fact remains that college students drive the majority of MB sales. Most other consumers are probably looking at a desktop rather than a laptop, since that makes more economical sense.I see the MacBook's intended audience as broader, though: consumers, not just students. The economics of the PC gaming world have created a substantial precedent for the ability to buy a laptop that will run games decently - by which I mean less than a state-of-the-art gaming laptop, but certainly more than what the Intel chipset provides - at an entry to mid-level price. At present, if I want an Apple laptop with that kind of performance, I have to shell out $2000 at a minimum, and that just isn't competitive. For certain subsets of consumers I'll buy the "just use consoles" argument, since college students really are more likely to do that, but I think the remaining chunk of gamers is large enough and significant enough that neither Apple nor those reviewing its product decisions should squeeze them out like this.
snip...
You want to tell me to keep my mouth shut, but what are you offering up? Give me a reason as to why you need SR? Please.
Actually my friend, Apple is very competitive in the market place. Changing chips and upgrading their systems everytime a vendor upgraded their hardware/software is what got Dell into the mess they're in today. Clear in simple their quality control and support dropped, while they were releasing cheap and bleeding edge machines.
Meanwhile, Apple's marketshare continues to grow! So in a competitive market, Apple is doing something right.
You mean, like the iMac getting Intel before the MacPros?![]()
Since when? The iMacs had Intel processors before Power Mac/Mac Pro did.![]()
Actually, you my friend are a cheap bastard. If you really need better graphics then spend the extra money and buy a MacBook Pro. It's as easy as that.
For the majority of the users out there, the MacBook does the job.
If you're using Pro Apps or play games, then it's not the computer for you. It's not like specs. aren't listed on the software.
Because you say so?
Between the 2 top models it cost $200 for 40 gig's and some color. Realy?
I am sorry but Intel processors weren't new tech. They might have been new to the Mac but weren't new tech. So this argument is void.
Really good counter-argument there.
Well, when someone predicts that the iMac is going to be a main update/announcement at WWDC, I think they NEED to be reminded what WWDC stands for. Clearly they haven't taken the venue into account when making their prediction.
There has always been a premium on the black macbook.