Um, I'm not in Europe dude. I'm in Aotearoa/New Zealand. You know, where the hobbits live? And we can't get good prices on US products because we refused to go to war in Iraq... sounds strange and politically charged, but it's true.There's not a conspiracy from US companies to ignore a large, affluent market such as Europe. I understand that it's the trendy thing to say (in the 30s it was the Jews, now it's the Americans), but perhaps you should look at the VAT and other government maneuvers that get in the way of a lower cost. *yawn*
Yes that's true. But I don't really think the operating systems are that different. I've used OS X at home for about two years now, and it's great that it's so secure and all, but in actual usability I find the difference hardly worth mentioning between it and Windows."Why should I pay $1500 for a gutless Mac Mini, when I can spend $1500 on a PC with 2.4ghz Core 2 Duo desktop CPU, 2gb RAM, and a nVidia 8800GTS!?!"
Because a PC doesn't run Mac OS X.
Hmm, thanks for the obnoxiousness.Don't let the door hit you on the way out. I'd rather use a G3 with OS X than a [insert a bunch of geek lingo that I don't care about because I'd rather spend my time with my lady] with Windows.
But we're not - we're paying less.......
Actually - we in the UK are paying more than they do in the US.
Cheapest MB - $1099 = £556. We pay £594 + VAT.
17" MBP - $2799 = £1416. We pay £1616 + vat.
It's not the 50-100% overcharge of Microsoft or Adobe, but we still pay more. Kudos to Apple for getting closer to the mark than any other IT firm.
Doug
Mind you, I think I read somewhere that average UK salaries we now a lot higher than they are in the US so that might need to be considered.
And just looking at the MB website on Apple.com...
"Race you to the future".
I have a question for all the people in this conversation...
How many people out here who are upset about the update on the macbooks, or lack of update as many people view it, are actually going to buy one, or were planning to buy one until this announcement? just wondering if this affects everyone who is upset or if everyone just wants something to be upset about.
Since when is it Apple's responsibility or any other companies for that matter, to educate the consumer?
luchtb said:I have a question for all the people in this conversation...
How many people out here who are upset about the update on the MacBooks, or lack of update as many people view it, are actually going to buy one, or were planning to buy one until this announcement? just wondering if this affects everyone who is upset or if everyone just wants something to be upset about.
Who knows, maybe there's more to life than looking after number one?
Everyone has the right to health.
EDIT: I honestly don't see the problem with high taxes so long as it goes to the right things. Places like Norway with really high taxes have a much better country for it.
China-made products face customs fees to US as well as EU, so what's the point? Does EU collect that much more than the US?
Please. If the Apple hardware was indeed manufactured in the US, then I'd buy this point.
$1099 (US) MacBook / 2044 GBP in October would now be "worth" 2165 GBP.
Erm, I think you'll want to try running that calc again, this time dividing the US$ by the exchange rate........![]()
also, standard VAT is at 17.5%...
so, before VAT, a Macbook costs: 594.89 GBP -> $1,171.34 US...
and $1,171 US is only $72 (36.56 GBP) more than the US price. Which brings us back to the import/export and distribution costs issues.
The Macbook weighs 5.1 lbs. add on about 2 pounds for packaging, and...
via UPS (I know this isn't how Apple would really ship) the cheapest price to ship from Cupertino to London is: $158.34 US, or about 80.42 GBP...
so, subtract the 80.42 GBP from the pre-VAT cost of a MacBook and you get: 514.47 GBP, which is $1012.99 US, which is $86.01 CHEAPER THAN WHAT APPLE CHARGES IN THE USA.
Most of the price difference is in the VAT. But in my opinion, I'd much rather pay a 17.5% VAT to get universal health care and all the other goodies you guys get like free college and pensions that follow you from job to job and EU-nation to EU-nation.
You obviously do know that Apple doesn't ship via UPS, so why did you make the claim that it was acctually cheaper in London? Shipping via freighter costs roughly 50 cents per pound for large shipments (which Apple would be doing). So, the cost of shipping the macbook is about $3.50.
Why would the macboook ship from Cupertino? That makes no sense at all. Beijing to London makes a lot more sense.
As for 17.5% VAT in exchange for health care and other benefits: they aren't always what they're cracked up to be. Some Europeans have to come to the United States for special procedures because the universal system can't handle the cost of new surgeries. People have to wait until the procedure becomes cheap enough for the system to pay for it. While it is terrible that many US citizens go un or underinsured, we should acknowledge that what works in one place may not work in another place.
regardless of where Apple ships its products from, the difference between pre-tax prices of both US-sold and UK-sold MacBooks is only about $72 US--a negligible 6.5% of the price.
Not true. The cost of living in Europe is higher in almost every other way. Converting dollars to pounds doesn't give you an accurate picture of how expensive Apple products are to Europeans. Americans have greater Purchasing Power Parity, ie, they can buy more with their dollars. A $1,171.34 macbook is more expensive to Europeans than it is to Americans. Everything doesn't convert as easily as you'd like it to.
The US is a very economically diverse nation, as I know EU nations are. To speak generally of the US vs. EU isn't very accurate. It is also important to consider salaries in one place compared to another. Some cities in the US have a greater gap between cost-of-living and Median income, where some are tighter.
The unfortunate thing with Apple is that the concept of an entry level machine isn't really equal to what is considered entry level in the PC world. I think this is the number one issue with respect to the release of this update, that is for the same money you can get a SANTA ROSA based machine in the PC world.
Maybe, I don't know what limitations you are working with but Linux can be a very easy OS for the novice if set up correctly. In some ways it can be better for the beginners as you can set it up easily in such a way that it is very difficult for them to screw it up. Linux can be better than Windows [spelling corrected] in this regard.
The thing is if you are going to become the support desk for family or friends go with an OS that makes your life easier. Linux offers you the ability to keep the user out of the parts of the system where they can do hard. Given that the user environment has matured vastly in the last couple of years it is doable.
As an aside I'd suggest not becoming the support desk for friends and family but that is me.
Interesting, I'm assuming this isn't Egypt NY.![]()
In any event thinking positive about where you live can make life a lot more bearable. If that doesn't work moving to some place else works.
This is exactly the issue I have why go with a what is suppose to be a base line system that doesn't even have a baseline chip set. In my case there is a lot more to Santa Rosa than just the graphics though. The power saving features are exactly what the MB platform needs. SR does have other benefits but the power savings and graphics improvements are exactly what is needed in a light weight machine.
I can only hope that Apple has the intentions of making use of SR is the much rumored MBLite. Knowing Apple though this will likely be a grossly over priced machine. From what can be gathered publicly it will be a machine designed around low power components.
Dave