SiliconAddict said:
The PC world has cutting edge laptop hardware that blows away the PowerBook but lacks on the software side. The Mac has solid software but lacks drastically on the hardware side of things. Until Apple fixes this deficiency you can make all the dang excuses you want. Its not going to change fact that the PowerBook still sucks.
Although I am a PC user, I disagree totally. My current laptop is an IBM Thinkpad 1.6 GHz, less than 6 months old. Let's compare to the G4 PowerBook available at the time it was bought.
It cost my employer about $3200 (including all the accessories - bag, docking station etc) - they also recently added a 1GByte RAM stick, that cost them $565 (!!! don't ask me how our IT dept managed to spend so much !!!), to a total of almost $3800. An individual could have saved a few hundred dollars, but it's still +1 toApple for cost.
It has 14" screen (+1 to Apple) but is lighter (+1 to IBM) and Bluetooth (evens), but only a wireless b card (+1 to Apple). It's screen resolution is 1400x1050, but if like me, your eyes are 39+ years old, your eyes would hurt when working on it for any longer than a couple of hours (hence they also bought me an LCD monitor at another $300) - so to me, higher resolution is reason /not/ to buy, but call that +1 to IBM.
It also runs XP, of course (+2 to Apple). Both the PPC and the Pentium-M outperform an equivalently clocked P4 (closer to AMD performance), but any benchmarks I've seen would put my 1.6GHz P-M at about the same performance as a PPC 1.4GHz, but let's call it even with the 1.5GHz Apple.
The ThinkPad doesn't have firewire (+1 to Apple), and only a combodrive (+1 to Apple)
Perhaps I'm missing something here, but the PB beats my Thinkpad at most rounds.
Of course, if you'd rather have a 9lb, power hungry brick, you can get better performing P4 "laptops"