Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So a revised update… isn’t that just an update? Like saying and update to the update. Know your words, MR.
nope, what they mean here is that there was already a small rollout of a firmware with this release number, this one appears to be a bit different but retains the version number, so it's a revision to the original update. MR got the words right, you need to read the posts more carefully
 
How did you determine that since the firmware version number didn't change and you don't have access to the build number?
What he said. You may know if you got the last update but apparently no way of knowing if you got today's. Same firmware (which was pushed to me last time).
 
These were never marketed as an anti theft device; that dissatisfaction is on you.
But they are/were marketed as a way to locate lost items. Last I checked, "theft" is a common occurrence in the subset of "lost" so it's ridiculous that they would alert a thief of the presence of an AirTag. It literally defeats the purpose of using an AirTag to locate a lost item under one of the most common scenarios.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: seek3r and dankron
Another Apple device, another firmware update. Own enough Apple devices and you can spend your whole life updating them endlessly
It’s a good thing this update is automatic. I’m sure some people spend their life obsessing about it though. I have more important things to worry about than what firmware my AirTag is running. As long as it’s working I’m happy.


Also you can’t tell if this update has been applied vs the previous version. From the article.

“Because the firmware version has not changed, it is not possible to tell the new firmware from the old firmware in the Find My app, nor will it be apparent when the firmware of the ‌AirTags‌ has been updated.”
 
this Apple way of doing "automatic firmware updates" for AirPods has caused the most problems out of any Apple device I've ever used.
 
nope, what they mean here is that there was already a small rollout of a firmware with this release number, this one appears to be a bit different but retains the version number, so it's a revision to the original update. MR got the words right, you need to read the posts more carefully
I know what they said. It’s silly to get so granular, is my point. An update, a revision to an update, a revision to a revision of an update. Who cares? It’s just another firmware update of which there are many over the course of a year.
 
I know what they said. It’s silly to get so granular, is my point. An update, a revision to an update, a revision to a revision of an update. Who cares? It’s just another firmware update of which there are many over the course of a year.
Honestly personally I found this interesting, but to each their own. I can't recall another time when Apple has revised a firmware update already released and kept the release tag. It's legitimately newsworthy, interesting look into their release process I'm wondering if this was a build issue instead of a code issue (ie something didn't get included because of a bug or there was a compilation err, etc)
 
But they are/were marketed as a way to locate lost items. Last I checked, "theft" is a common occurrence in the subset of "lost" so it's ridiculous that they would alert a thief of the presence of an AirTag. It literally defeats the purpose of using an AirTag to locate a lost item under one of the most common scenarios.
Apple has clearly decided that protecting people from being stalked by violent criminals is far more important than helping people track down their stolen items, which I think is the right call. Things can be replaced, people can't.
 
I wish I had one of those tags when I was teaching. I had to have a mobile classroom and I could find my crap easier when another teacher moved my cart. I used to dream of having a tracking device with a self-destruct option, Generally it was the same teacher (got even my last year). Yup takes my cart and push the button. But I can see the advantage of having the tracker with a kid. Put it in the lunch box, back pack, music instrument case, stuff kids lose all the time.

I have one on the tv control, my keys, wife's purse and keys, dog leash, my wallet. stuff that can be misplaced. Also a nice toy.
 
All four of mine are still on 1.0.225, they never appear to have updated since deployed back in May. I don’t particularly care.
 
Far as I know that functionality hasn’t been affected at all. Now if the object is sentient, it will be aware of tracking in ca 8hours instead of 3 days. No harm to you.
The most important things people want to track are, in fact, sentient: kids, parents, pets, etc. Other important things may not be alive but are around people who don’t want the beeping and for whatever reason don’t turn it off. The opportunity for Apple to address these situations is likely much larger (and more beneficial to society) than that for simply finding lost stuff, like keys.
 
Mine has not updated, but my wife's has. Its in the Belkin keyring holder. Anyone think I should remove it?
No. All of mine are in either Belkin or Apple holders, and not really even near my phone, and they all updated. I didn't do anything, move anything, or remove anything. It just happened.
 
I wasn't relating to this thread because the Tag I had updated immediately last time. But I bought a new one on Thursday—and it's still on the first version. So odd.
 
ERROR ... I always get a message Connecting the signal is weak, try somewhere else AIRTAG
 
Not sure when it happened, as I've never checked the firmware on mine before, but all 5 of the AirTags connected to my phone have been updated.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.