Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So........ back on topic.
Some of the 3.1.1 installation is done during system boot (you know, during the extra long gear churning right after POST). I'm curious how many people had their "gears" turning for an extra long time, like more than 30 seconds. All my Macs were done with this process in 30 seconds or less. Anyone have this problem? Any ideas why some systems had this problem and some didn't?
 
So........ back on topic.
Some of the 3.1.1 installation is done during system boot (you know, during the extra long gear churning right after POST). I'm curious how many people had their "gears" turning for an extra long time, like more than 30 seconds. All my Macs were done with this process in 30 seconds or less. Anyone have this problem? Any ideas why some systems had this problem and some didn't?

On Windoze, running XP, it took longer to boot it up than usual (I had to do a reboot as well)
 
Who really cares? It's a useless feature.

yeah, i suppose. but why would anyone say it's negative? just to do it to be dorks about it? it just urks me that no matter what the article is about, someone votes it negative. like enough of a percentage to notice it on a daily basis. like, the article could say "apple gives away free mac pros to everyone on mac rumors", and someone would vote it negative i guarantee.
just bugs me i guess.....
 
Yes I hear that the problem is the old libraries that may have been upgraded may still be resident in memory until everything free's it up it. Try upgrading libc on (pretty much as *nix) and it won't need a reboot but a lot of stuff won't be using the new versions.
That is true.

With UNIX file-system semantics, a file's disk blocks are freed when the last directory entry is removed and the last open file handle referencing it is closed.

If you delete and replace a shared library, applications currently running will keep using the one they have. They'll use the new one when they quit and restart.
I suspect this is the case with these type of updates it's the only way to ensure the new libraries are loaded and as these are predominately security related it makes sense. For the brave amongst us you can ignore the restart but on your heads be it !
You could still get (from the OS) the list of applications that are using the library. The installer could then present you with the list and ask if you want to just terminate them or just reboot.

Even key system apps (like the Finder or the system UI server) can be restarted, although you might have to log out to make that happen.
 
You guys make it hard for someone to read this thread and determine whether they should install the update or not. hehe
 
What's the big issue with rebooting?

OS X is designed to sort out lots of issues upon restart. That is: DESIGNED TO!, meaning you have less need to use apps such as Disk Utility etc.

Te days of taking pride in not restarting a Mac are over. Intel [inside... sshhh] to care of that.

Now, a restart is the first and best way to sort issues. Get over it.

It's not a big deal, but most people with Unix see a reboot as a cop-out. In other words, there's nothing that can be done in a reboot that couldn't be done at runtime.

In practice, it's easier for most end users to just do a reboot, but power users are forced to wonder.

Also, lately my laptop never works when I reboot to finish an installation. I have to reboot, then turn it off, turn it back on, and then it finishes correctly.
 
It's not a big deal, but most people with Unix see a reboot as a cop-out. In other words, there's nothing that can be done in a reboot that couldn't be done at runtime.
... aside from a kernel upgrade. But that's obviously not the situation here.
You guys make it hard for someone to read this thread and determine whether they should install the update or not.
Most people (including me) are not having problems, but with every update, there are some people that to experience problems. This isn't unusual - the same thing happens with all software products from all manufacturers.

Sometimes the problem is self-inflicted, sometimes it's due to an incompatibility with some kind of haxie (which sometimes was installed surreptitiously - like the broken input managers that Logitech's keyboard and mouse software uses) sometimes the installation itself messes up, and sometimes there are other problems.

Always keep in mind that a web forum such as this one will give you a skewed perspective. People without problems don't post very many messages, while people with serious problems will post a lot. This should not be surprising to anyone, but you can definitely get an artificially-bad perspective if you forget this fact.

If you are truly worried, I recommend you
  1. Wait a week or two to update. If there is a serious problem that affects a lot of people (indicating an actual problem with the update and not some other factor that only affects a small number of users) then Apple will usually release another update within that time.
  2. Make a full backup before you update. If you experience a problem that you can't fix, you can restore your system from that backup to undo the update. You can do this yourself using your favorite backup system (including Time Machine) or you can use a program specially designed for this purpose (like Deep Freeze, which may be a good idea if you think may need to do this often.)

FWIW, I don't take any special measures. I make a full-system backup every week, as part of my routine system maintenance procedure. If an update truly messes up the system (which hasn't yet happened, thankfully), I can restore my system from the most recent backup.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.