It was a reference to the moaning about the most recent update to the Macbooks. i.e a JOKE.
![]()
Ohhhh okay, that I get yah!
It was a reference to the moaning about the most recent update to the Macbooks. i.e a JOKE.
![]()
My comment was poorly worded.APPLE has NEVER said that they are not going to allow third party headphones to work. READ THE PRESS RELEASE. They said the exact OPPOSITE.
Oh my head hurts.
I'd love to pick one of these up to use solely in my car, instead of fumbling with my iPhone... but there would be no way to control it?! Thats a dumb move.
The part they don't like is that you are locked into Apples earphones which leave a lot to be desired for a few power users on MacRumors.
That's true. So, as long as I never want an up-to-date iPod Shuffle with the most storage, I'm good.![]()
Ok, go buy one and wait until you need new headphones. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to shell out $30 for new headphones.
Do we really need an even smaller iPod that holds more songs? It's become the annual mantra of Apple!
Sometimes I think they are becoming a kind of parody of themselves, you know what I mean?
Also to everyone complaining about "Baawww no 3rd party headphones" maybe you should look on the store and you'll see that companies have already released headphones with the inline remote attached.
Looks great! And for once this is something we didn't see coming!
The white earphones that come with iPods are fine anyway.
If you're an audiophile should you even be considering a Shuffle???
Do we really need an even smaller iPod that holds more songs? It's become the annual mantra of Apple!
Sometimes I think they are becoming a kind of parody of themselves, you know what I mean?
So my high end headphones i have must be replaced with specific 3rd party offerings..........
Wake up and smell the coffee you complainers. It's an ipod SHUFFLE - it's not the top of the line beast meant for connecting and controlling and customizing etc.
If you don't like the shuffle and want other earbuds/headphones, do one or more of the following:
1: Buy the old one. It's still just as good as it was yesterday.
2: Buy a nano (it's actually really small, and even has a screen)
3: Buy something from another manufacturer og an other ipod
4: Just shut up and accept the realities.
Apple has ADDED another item to their list of ipods. If you don't want it, it doesn't affect you AT ALL. I know they will be discontinuing the old shuffle in the future, but now you know, and you can buy one during the next weeks/months if you prefer that one. It's not like the mac pro where the old one was ripped away without warning.
Just going by personal observation. Few of my friends use Apple's earbuds. Rather they purchase headphones/earphones that suit their tastes.Corrected.
My comment was poorly worded.
When I said locked in, I meant that there are few alternatives out there.
Here in Japan, I can go to a local electronics store and have literally 100's of headphone and earphone options. Haven't seen one that will work with Apple's interface. That is why I said locked in.
As usual the world seems to revolve around right handed people, so that if you hapen to be left- handed its more difficult to use the controls.
Way to be dismissive.
What about those of us with young children have been saving their allowance for months to get an iPod but the Apple earbuds are too large and uncomfortable for their 8 year olds? Now they have to get an adapter in order to use earbuds that fit or save for a few more months to get a nano that they do not need the capacity of.
I know it is not an essential purchase, but an 8 year old daughter saving $50 for this purchase was an accomplishment. Now she has to wait even longer, turning this into a possible negative lesson for her.
So my high end headphones i have must be replaced with specific 3rd party offerings..........
Yep. I hope Apple's design goal for this wasn't to make something so small there was no room for controls. It seems like a dangerous focus to me. but what do i know. I thought the new Mac mini with no keyboard and mice included was a stupid idea but it seemed to work out for them.
Have you noticed how smooth things seem to go for Apple? I often think Steve Jobs has sold his soul to the devil to make Apple work.
Seriously, don't you just love Apple apologists?
WAKE UP! The last product that Apple made that was truly innovative was the iPhone in 2006. We have had 2 years of nothing but incremental upgrades and change in materials (iMac design revision). Teach these hype-riding idiots a lesson by selling your Apple stock - his Jobsness should've been deposed once his health started affecting his design.
Seriously, I first saw this on Engadget and my first reaction was "Is this a joke?" It looked like something the Onion would do.
1) No 3rd party headphones
2) No repeat functionality of any kind, not even a manual repeat where you would just click "back" at the end of the song.
3) That computer voice is going to crap on the mood of the song.
4) It takes too long to get anywhere.
If Apple wanted to introduce VoiceOver as a gimmicky feature it should have been an OPTIONAL entity, not forced upon the user in combination with forcing the user to stick with their earbuds.
If you don't at least doubt Apple in the slightest after this, then you're truly crazy.
We obviously differ in opinions on this.In the meantime, Apple is offering you free, very decent quality headphones that are compatible and premium In-Ear that are compatible as well.