Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I got my Ipod Touch yesterday after v2 was released thinking I'd get to have it at no extra cost as the release was brought out after I bought and registered but still had to buy it. Is this right?

Mike

By reading what Apple has said about the update:
"iPod touch applications are unlike anything you’ve ever seen on a mobile device. The world’s best developers are creating applications to leverage the groundbreaking technology in iPod touch, such as the Multi-Touch interface, the accelerometer, real-time 3D graphics, and 3D positional audio. It’s all part of the iPhone 2.0 Software Update for iPod touch.*

*Access to the App Store requires the iPhone 2.0 Software Update for iPod touch, sold separately. Some applications are not available in all areas. Application availability and pricing are subject to change."

It sounds as if every new iPod touch will come with 1.1.4 (or whatever replaces it--possibly 1.1.5), and to get 2.0, everyone must pay their $10. At least that is what I interpreted

Source:
http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/appstore/
 
Overall I am pretty happy thus far with my ipod touch 2.0. Feels snappier than my hacked 1.1.1 was, and the appstore is nifty. My biggest issue is now we have to pay for what used to be freeware on the hacked versions. I don't mind paying for real apps but $1.99 for a flash light app (ie. a solid white picture)? riiiiiiigghhhhtttt....
 
That's correct, but we were talking about paying for an upgrade to an iPod Touch vs getting it free on the original iPhone. Had nothing to do with the 3g.

You assume you are entitled to something that was never offered as free.

Well, I own an iPhone. I'm here arguing on behalf of iPod touch buyers.

If you spend $299, $399, or $499 on a device that you don't really need, you ARE entitled to FREE updates to that device for at least a period of two years. End of discussion.

I can download media player without downloading the OS. Same with IE. It's integrated, but not part of the OS. I can also download a number of apps that become integrated with the OS, but are not sold or created by the OS maker (either MS or Apple)

Please don't comment on things you clearly know nothing about. In Windows 98, 98SE, ME, 2000, and XP, Internet Explorer is as integrated into the OS as an engine as integrated into a car.

Back in the 98 days, there was actually a group of people who were dedicated to modifying Windows 98's kernel to strip IE out of it and replace it with the Windows 95 kernel, but still get all of Windows 98's benefits.

Windows Media Player is also as tightly integrated into XP and Vista as IE was in all of those other Windows OSes. Windows Media Player provides the ground work for Media Center, and it provides the technology for system wide hardware acceleration for video playback that essentially makes it possible for any PC with a dedicated GPU from the last 3 or 4 generations to play high definition video in reduced power states. It also helps video look much better than it does on OS X.

So what you are saying is Apple should have given away OS X 10.2, 10.3, 10.4 and 10.5 because they can run on the same hardware as the previous versions and are only point upgrades?!?

I love how Apple fans deliberately misinterpret my words.

Should Apple have given away those updates? No. Should they have been cheaper? Yes.

Don't deliberately twist my words for your own argument.

firewire 400 and 800?

Firewire is essentially dead. USB 2.0 replaced Firewire 400 (don't give me that speed crap, if you buy quality hardware it will have a quality USB 2.0 controller and it will be every bit as fast), and eSATA is pretty much kicking Firewire 800 into its grave as we speak. $600 laptops are coming with eSATA these days and its making its way into many devices and most Windows PCs being sold now.

Like single piece desktop computers?

I'm sorry, but I don't like throw-away computers. I also don't like that if the webcam, DVD drive, monitor GPU, or something small goes wrong, you have to send the entire computer end to get repaired. This is one reason why I want to get rid of both my MacBook and HP notebook. In a desktop, if the DVD drive goes bad you pull it out and get a new one. GPU goes bad? Pull it out, get a cheap one, send that one in for repair. Monitor goes bad? Same thing. You're down for only the time it takes you to get a replacement part. With an Mac or PC notebook, you're down for days, if not weeks. In my case with my first MacBook, I was without the system for 3 weeks because I had to keep shipping it back due to Flextronics being unable to see that the DVD drive could not write DVDs.

LCD displays?

What? PCs were shipping with LCD displays and had LCD displays on sale before the iMac shipped with them standard.

Plug and play?

Windows 98 had "plug and play". Windows 95 had pre-emptive multi-tasking a full.. what? 6 years before Mac OS did?

Like EFI replacing BIOS?

What good has that done? It still takes a good 11-13 seconds depending on how you count from the time you press the power button to the time the OS begins loading. Same as a PC with a BIOS.

I agree Microsoft's inability to make a decent OS led me to buy Apple computers.

Well, let's see for a second. Microsoft had pre-emptive multi-tasking more than half a decade before Mac OS did. It also standardized core technologies for gaming and 3D graphics that OS X now depends on. It brought in the audio standards all computers use now. Microsoft's gaming technologies lead to the interest and need that brought us the fast processors and hardware that now power every Mac. Microsoft also pioneered system wide hardware acceleration for video playback. That means that a $600 Walmart PC based off AMD's Puma platform or nVidia's 8000 IGP can play bluray discs! Something NO Mac can do either because of hardware or because OS X simply does not support it.

You really don't know a thing about OS X if you believe that.

Okay, so let me know when OS X can run a game from 1995. I have my original MYST Windows CD from the early 90s and, guess what, it still works on Vista.
 
Why is one entitled to free updates? I bought a computer with Tiger on it, I paid to get Leopard. A person has the same functionality today with the iPod they bought last week or a year ago. For $10 you can get new functionality.
 
Why is one entitled to free updates? I bought a computer with Tiger on it, I paid to get Leopard. A person has the same functionality today with the iPod they bought last week or a year ago. For $10 you can get new functionality.

The fact you're paying to get access to a STORE, perhaps? That reminds me of rib burnoffs where they charge you $10 to get in the gate so you can spend MORE money actually consuming ribs. You could go straight to a restaurant and avoid the $10 fee. You're already paying for the meal, after all. Apple is apparently holding a rib burnoff contest. They charge the vendors (30% of all profits right off the top, Mafia style) and then they charge you to get access to the vendors ($10 x thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of iPod Touch uers). No big deal? Like I've said before, go ahead and send me $10 then if it's no big deal. $10 x 1 million users = $10 million <> No big deal in my book.

Let's look at AppleTV. Did they charge for the 2.x upgrades? No? Why not? Don't they have to account for them? What's the deal people? How can they "have to charge" for iPod Touches for an upgrade to buy apps and yet they don't apparently have to charge for a box designed to buy and rent movies??? Sorry, but I don't buy into that argument for a second. As others have pointed out, Sony doesn't do that for the PSP. Microsoft doesn't do that for the Zune. No, Apple is KNOWN for charging you ala carte for every little thing, short warranty periods so they can charge you for "Apple Care", etc. I hate Microsoft, but I'm no fan of Apple either, just some of their products.

Frankly, I'd be happy if Apple would actually start listening to their customers and fixing bugs and other problems that are reported. I can lock my AppleTV up so it needs the power plug pulled to reset and I reported the bug some time ago and they didn't fix it even though it probably would have taken them about 5 minutes to do so (don't freeze frame a photo in a slide show beyond the screen saver interval or it will hose your AppleTV until you do a hard reset).

Memory cards, file exchange or mass drive ability, removable batteries...you'll never see these things for the iPhone or iPod Touch without 3rd party hacking because Apple has monetary incentives to NOT offer them. You won't even get Stereo Bluetooth support until Apple offers its own headphones (which would probably be the only ones that work with it) so they can sell you more stuff because in the mean time they're making money off licensed docking stations and the like. Forget about Airtunes from the iPhone straight to an AppleTV or Airport Express for similar reasons. They want you to buy a docking station to get audio out of that thing. I hate how Apple LIMITS their technology just so they can make a quick buck.

Now that I do have 2.0 firmware, I'm finding I can't really run or at least enjoy some software because they're designed with the idea in mind that you have a working speaker on your iPhone. Well, the iPod Touch has some kind of internal muffled speaker, but it's not operational for audio playback so if I want to play a game, I have to plug in headphones, which isn't cool for games like that beer one where you'd generally prefer to NOT have cord dangling out of it while you pick it up and pretend to drink your brew or that lightsaber toy for the same reason.

I guess I'll be looking to buy a used iPhone 1.x generation just to use as a 2nd iPod Touch so I can run games, etc. without having to plug in headphones. The iPod Touch also has no bluetooth (even though it'd be useful) so no wireless mono headsets to use instead for sound and no camera (which ALSO would have been useful, but apparently we don't need it on a Touch according to Steve Jobs). So basically, a used iPhone 1.x makes a better iPod Touch than an actual iPod Touch. If I can get one on eBay for a bit less than a real equivalent one, I'll be buying one for the added functionality. I'm also pretty sure I can hack it so I can use my pre-pay sim card from my current pre-pay AT&T phone to enable phone calls as well and just shut off GSM data for WiFi only functionality for the rest of the iPhone's functions. So I may be able to get rid of my current cell phone as well without incurring monthly charges (I buy prepay minutes by the YEAR for $100 for 1000 minutes which last year I only used 300 minutes so with rollover I now have almost 1700 minutes; I'd be crazy to pay $40 a month for minutes I don't use or need).
 
If you spend $299, $399, or $499 on a device that you don't really need, you ARE entitled to FREE updates to that device for at least a period of two years. End of discussion.

Same ignorant opinion that was whined about endlessly back when people had to pay for the first major update to iPod touch software. I really don't understand where this absurd sense of entitlement comes from, and I can't believe we have to suffer through the same stupid debate all over again. Are we going to go through this every time the iPod touch gets a major upgrade? There's really a very simple way to settle this ridiculous argument...

Q: Are you the CEO of Apple Co. or a member of the board of directors?

A: If you answered "no" to that question, then you don't get to flatly state what people ARE entitled to for FREE from the company as though it is fact. End of discussion.
 
Can anyone confirm that the new ones that are being shipped have 2.0 on them?

Well i ordered mine on Saturday, the day the firmware was released and it states that it is shipping with January software. It was a tax free weekend in my state so I saved a good amount of money on my Macbook and accessories , about $103. However, about $10 of the 16 dollars or so I saved on the iPod might be going back to buy the new firmware.....oh well, I really can't complain, the iPod was free. Maybe they will give me the updated firmware free since I purchased it the same day it was released...
 
LOOOOOVE IT!!!! Thats all I gotta say. 2.0 was so wroth the wait.



Dude! 1.1.4 was $20 this is half off!

Ya 2.0 was worth the wait. But, its a total glitch! I get so aggravated at my iPod sometimes that I feel like throwing it against the wall! The games freeze, sometimes they open then they close, the iPod has ALOT of freezes, and to top it off, wifi now sucks a ton of energy off of my iPod! Way to go Apple! I am very pleased now!:mad:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.