looks like I'm leaning toward a 21.5". I've always thought that the 22" range monitor was the ideal size.
In the BTO on the Canadian edcuation site I was able to upgrade from the ATI Radeon HD 4670 256MB to the ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB at no extra cost.
Strange?
ANY WORD ON WHEN THESE NEW iMACS WILL HIT A STORE LIKE BEST BUY?
Dropping the single socket model? OKThe Mac Pro will be seeing a refresh soon anyway...
I like these new iMacs.
That said, the C2D models are a waste of time. Get the i5/i7 choice if you're going to buy.
The Core i7 860 outperforms the Core i7 920.
The iMac is better now at raw CPU action.![]()
I can't believe there wasn't a bigger graphics card offered on the high end 27. That would be a selling point for me. I think I am going to use student loan next autumn and get a mac pro after all and keep using my cinema screen. Shame, I was hoping to upgrade to an imac to save some space.
Overall, I gotta give them 9/10 stars on the update. Just 512mb 4850m really going to hold it back -- then again apple tends to make up for the lower graphics needed elsewhere. My guess is energy usage on the cards higher than the 4850 not meeting apple's standards to the environment. But, really, how much is a graphics card going to hurt an otherwise flawless energy efficient machine?
ANY WORD ON WHEN THESE NEW iMACS WILL HIT A STORE LIKE BEST BUY?
1. Just so everyone knows. Blu-Ray will not make it. Not even the PS4 will end up having BR. Why? Because DVD had a long time to cement itself in the marketplace and is still extremely cheap. BR discs are not. And by the time they got to the point of lower prices and being fully entrenched in the mainstream they will be beaten to the punch by downloads. On-demand, Netflix boxes/TV integration, and a host of other rising options mean that BR will be skipped in favor of downloadable data. Many of us, myself included, prefer physical media, but like many things, that will change and downloads will get adopted before BR has the chance to fully replace DVD, so it will end up coming up short.
2. Any word on whether the remote works with the Apple TV?
Does this mean new ACDs at 21.5" and 27" then...? *drool*
2. Any word on whether the remote works with the Apple TV?
I think you missed my point.Get over it. iMac could have dual quad core Xenon CPUs and 16GB of RAM standard and you'd still cry that you can build a cheap ass tower with a crummy display and run it as a Hackintosh for less.
I can't believe there wasn't a bigger graphics card offered on the high end 27. That would be a selling point for me. I think I am going to use student loan next autumn and get a mac pro after all and keep using my cinema screen. Shame, I was hoping to upgrade to an imac to save some space.
Overall, I gotta give them 9/10 stars on the update. Just 512mb 4850m really going to hold it back -- then again apple tends to make up for the lower graphics needed elsewhere. My guess is energy usage on the cards higher than the 4850 not meeting apple's standards to the environment. But, really, how much is a graphics card going to hurt an otherwise flawless energy efficient machine?
Why is the C2D a waste? is i5/i7 that big difference for the money?
It's just, here's an update that no one was expecting (27 inch with i7!?) and still people only want to mention the lack of blu-ray.
are you seriously kidding me? people said the EXACT SAME THING about .mp3 downloads/storage in 2000.Your logic is flawed. No one has the amount of storage space required to sustain a library of HD digital downloads.
I've said this already, but I'm *VERY* disappointed at the lack of a 5870 or equivalent. The 4850 was a pretty decent card early this year on a 24" screen. But now, almost a year later, it's going to be a HUGE bottleneck at the 27's resolution.
I guess I'll hold out for the Mac Pro refresh.![]()