Good as I don't want to mess around using iTunes to do an update. I only do OTA.
Good as I don't want to mess around using iTunes to do an update. I only do OTA.
I just wanna know where all the, ‘No it’s your own fault' posters are.
Or they're telling the truth.I guess Apple thought that they couldn't win a lawsuit especially when you brick the entire phone on purpose.
Also you create a situation of people not wanting to upgrade when trying to sale a unauthorized repaired device. Resale would take a hit.
Thats confusing and unconventional!
How does this update weaken security? Apple clearly stated it wasn't a security feature and it never should have been customer facing: "We apologize for any inconvenience, this was designed to be a factory test and was not intended to affect customers. "
I'm assuming it's still used at the factory for validation.
Hahahaha so even Apple admits it made a mistake despite the many Apple apologists praising the company for doing it.
Truth or not, it should have been the first thing they said. The original "security feature" statement from Apple PR seemed to be a knee jerk response that, in hindsight, exacerbated the situation. A simple "We're investigating the issue and will have a resolution shortly." would have been infinitely better. Couple of days later, this fix is issued. Helluva lot better than giving the appearance of just making up stuff.Or they're telling the truth.
Actually, if that's what it does (and we're still guessing here), then it's doing it's job. It's detecting a problem with the phone and not allowing it to go from the factory without being addressed.It BRICKS a phone at the factory, instead of just popping up and saying something is wrong? It just keeps sounding fishy.
I just wanna know where all the, ‘No it’s your own fault' posters are.
Apple have admitted that they were wrong. That means it’s Ok for you lot to as well you know……...
It BRICKS a phone at the factory, instead of just popping up and saying something is wrong? It just keeps sounding fishy.
I just wanna know where all the, ‘No it’s your own fault' posters are.
Apple have admitted that they were wrong. That means it’s Ok for you lot to as well you know……...
Your pro-nanny state pro-big government stance is utter treason. The Court Order required Apple to turn over the modified OS to the FBI. Your assertion is false. You seem to be an Android user, so you wouldn't know about security. The FBI wouldn't even bother asking Google to do this because an 8 year old kid could hack any android phone.
Honestly, it seems you wasted your time joining. You clearly don't have a good understanding of the issue and the circumstances surrounding it. Respectfully, you would do yourself a favor by researching what actually happened, Apple's original response to it, and their subsequent resolution. If you did that, you'd be more informed and would most likely render an opinion more closely related to the actual subject. Just a thought. Or you could keep doing what you're doing. Either way, welcome.I am right here. I joined today specifically to rebut you.
If you take your iPhone to an unauthorized service center and allow untrained personnel to work on your iPhone there is nobody else to blame here. There is absolutely no other logical argument to be made. Apple did not put a gun to heads and compel anyone to violate their warranties or use third-party parts. This is pure emotion run amok by people who shouldn't be allowed to play with matches, let alone run around unsupervised in society.
If you think you have a rational, logical argument why you should break your iPhone but have Apple indemnify you completely, I will entertain it. I doubt there is one, but it should be amusing to hear them.
Our long (three week) national nightmare is finally over. The few dozen people reported to have bricked phones can finally use them again. Yay freedom!
At least we can now focus on less important matters like the future of the country.
Speaking of TouchID not working...
I have set up TouchID several times, and I can't get it to work, with the same finger, more than once or twice. Seriously.
I'll delete the finger, and set it up again, and it might work once, twice, and then *PFFT* Nothing...
Was there an issue with defective TouchID sensors in the 6+? It's becoming a waste of time trying to make it work. I thought it was the 'ID condom' on my OtterBox, so I pulled it off, and still *PFFT*
Wow. SO everyone proclaiming that this was a necessary safety implentation and that Apple shouldn't budge were utterly and completely wrong and this was either NOT working as intended or the public pressure put on Apple caused them to backpedal (I am guessing the former).
Your post makes you look idiotic. If you joined after my statement you can’t be one of those original posters it was directed at can you? Duh.I am right here. I joined today specifically to rebut you.
If you take your iPhone to an unauthorized service center and allow untrained personnel to work on your iPhone there is nobody else to blame here. There is absolutely no other logical argument to be made. Apple did not put a gun to heads and compel anyone to violate their warranties or use third-party parts. This is pure emotion run amok by people who shouldn't be allowed to play with matches, let alone run around unsupervised in society.
If you think you have a rational, logical argument why you should break your iPhone but have Apple indemnify you completely, I will entertain it. I doubt there is one, but it should be amusing to hear them.
That's why I went with how many were reported in various articles. I can't imagine the total is very big (on Apple scale), but I don't know.You really don't know how many people were affected by this. But snark noted![]()
Ok, so I’ll pipe down. Whether I agree with you or not I do see the reason and respect in your reply.I am right here.
Yep, I was wrong, but I also assumed it was intended and (still) agreed that bricking a once-working post-fix phone out of no where was douchy. I don't think anyone here was justifying that.
However, to brick a phone because a component that has major recourse through the security facede was modified, potentially unsafely, is completely acceptable (in my opinion, I have to add for those who think its anything more). I've seen repeatedly though history that exploiting the hardware means no safe bets - it is incredibly dangerous and to say "Well TouchID is a one-way channel," is not enough to subvert any worry about someones hardware access to any device.
And yet some members were in denial keeping on saying what Apple was doing was right as it was an "unauthorised" repair.Jokes on those guys now.Hahahaha
Get your definition of "bricking" right. It's not a brick if it can be fixed by software.It BRICKS a phone at the factory, instead of just popping up and saying something is wrong? It just keeps sounding fishy.