My best guess is that this WILL get the same classification as cellphones... meaning don't do it or get ticketed. While it conceptually offers the potential for an exceptional turn-by-turn mapping app, there are pads designed to block off all peripheral vision beyond a point. A driver needs to be able to turn that head to the left & right mirror and their further left peripheral and further right peripheral will get a peek over their immediate shoulders.
Unlike many so pessimistic on here, I lean positive on this product... but I doubt I would EVER wear it while driving and hope I would never see anyone else daring to do that too. Perhaps the actual views while wearing it is enhanced such that wearer has up to better vision "around there" than a mask-less driver, but I see no camera over at the temples, so I'm not sure HOW it could match or exceed unencumbered human eye peripheral.
That shared though, the good old motorcycle helmet can also block off some peripheral vision, which can set up a much more dangerous scenario for that kind of rider, that will typically be much more likely to be life threatening for them. So one might be able to make some kind of "fair" case that if motorcycle helmets are OK, why not Vpro.
I won't. Best guess is that this reduces vision while driving, endangering drivers, passengers and anyone in other vehicles too. Item #461 to put to some range of vision tests when these are actually "in the wild" so people can see what they can and cannot do.
Even in some scenario where one could argue how some kind of mapping help is justifying it, how would the police know wearer is not engaged in some intense game with slight transparency on to see through so they can (try to) drive and play at the same time. Think "texting & driving" is dangerous? Imagine the fool trying to be a Fruit Ninja while driving.