Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Now if only Apple could focus on removing outdated product designs, they might be on to something.
 
I probably have half of these apps currently on my Mac. It bugs me when the really useful apps aren't ever updated. Oh well, such is life.
 
The inexorable march towards update after update is slightly annoying. It means that there are no legacy apps that work and don't require updates and constant development as a result. I love the refinements of updates but any old apps should just be hidden by newer versions of iOS rather than removed. If they worked on old phones with old os then why not? Apple is a very all or nothing company and i'm not really very keen on their current approach to obsolesce over time.
 
Apple is a very all or nothing company and i'm not really very keen on their current approach to obsolesce over time.

exactly
but Aple has always been such a company. And they do update the next version so just for that would not be such as Android.
 
Apple is so full of crap. It isn't old software that slows down devices, it's new software like iOS upgrades!

It's pretty hypocritical of them to remove supposedly out of date software from the app store, when most of their hardware hasn't been updated in YEARS.
[doublepost=1479343085][/doublepost]
Stopped developing for iOS long ago. After flappy bird was hyped and my e-learning app was declared "useless" by Apple because of technical details that were perfectly fine to them one year before that. Two years on Android now. - Good luck to you, Apple, i'm out.
This makes me wonder how many of these 40,000 apps are from other developers who have abandoned the platform.
[doublepost=1479343717][/doublepost]
I still think this is a bad move on Apple, as you'll have a perfectly functioning app removed just because u just chose not to update it to iOS 10...

Apple may be doing good, but this is forcing developers to stay current.. Pitty they can't have the same power end users do and flick a 'switch' to say "I'm choose not to update to iOS10" but seems its more like "if u wanna be on the App Store, u will"
This is actually pretty typical behaviour for Apple. Once you get past the marketing BS, they are one of the most unpleasant, ruthless, unethical and deceptive companies you will ever encounter.
 
Aha this might finally explain those apps that keep mysteriously saying an update is available yet won't update

Now if only there were a fix w/o removing said apps that can appease my app OCD :rolleyes::(
 
I still think this is a bad move on Apple, as you'll have a perfectly functioning app removed just because u just chose not to update it to iOS 10...

Apple may be doing good, but this is forcing developers to stay current.. Pitty they can't have the same power end users do and flick a 'switch' to say "I'm choose not to update to iOS10" but seems its more like "if u wanna be on the App Store, u will"
And just what is wrong with expecting developers to update their apps for iOS 10? As a user, why wouldn't I want my app to be optimised for the latest OS and (ideally) supporting the newest and latest APIs?

The news was made known way in advance, and developers have had plenty of time to react. They chose not to, and so consequences were meted out.
 
I still think this is a bad move on Apple, as you'll have a perfectly functioning app removed just because u just chose not to update it to iOS 10...

But Apple also knows whether that app will work under their top-secret potential prototypes for iOS 11+. Why let someone buy an app that won't work in a few months?

This is also very bad news for iPhone 2G owners. Thankfully there are non-Apple methods of getting apps for iPhone 2G, and these will now become an absolute necessity.

Updates to apps including armv6 compatibility hasn't been supported by Xcode (or OS X) for several years now. But if a developer updates their app for arm64, customers seem to still be able to download the last compatible previous version (for iOS 3.1 armv6, 6.1 armv7, etc.) to their old devices from the App store, if the developer allows it (which they may or may not want due to bugs or support issues, etc.)
 
Updates to apps including armv6 compatibility hasn't been supported by Xcode (or OS X) for several years now. But if a developer updates their app for arm64, customers seem to still be able to download the last compatible previous version (for iOS 3.1 armv6, 6.1 armv7, etc.) to their old devices from the App store, if the developer allows it (which they may or may not want due to bugs or support issues, etc.)
That feature was introduced in iOS 4, so works back to iPhone 3G/3GS, iPad 1, etc. iPhone 2G & iPod Touch 1 are stuck at 3.1.3.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.