However you can’t publicly recruit thousands of random people to join you in your illegal activities with those two things. And if the carriers of those communications knew what they were being used for, they’d likely terminate service for those clients as well. But telecoms don’t listen in on phone calls or read your texts. Nice try though.
What about declaring wanting to scrub an entire race from the face of the planet? Are we saying that Trump violated some rule that could incite violence while Kim Jong Un wanting to nuke us doesn’t cross any line? If you support this live you’re short sighted. Can only imagine the outrage if Pelosi or AOC were banned. If Omar is still there then the bias is pretty obvious.Not saying he's not. A world leader can still get banned, but they have different rules for that. Threats of war against another country are evidently not ban material because they believe there's value to the public in leaving them up.
World Leaders on Twitter: principles & approach
An update on Tweets from world leadersblog.twitter.com
Yup, unorganized jokers who killed a police officer. Nailed it..
If Pelosi or AOC incited a seditious insurrection that resulted in unlawful breach of a federal building and led to the deaths of 5 people, then yes I would expect them to be banned.
Oh good to know. Thanks for the info.Yeah I do, the Supreme Court upheld it:
U.S. Supreme Court backs Christian baker who rebuffed gay couple
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory on narrow grounds to a Colorado baker who refused based on his Christian beliefs to make a wedding cake for a gay couple, stopping short of setting a major precedent allowing people to claim religious exemptions from anti-discrimination...www.reuters.com
Plus this became a thing because he openly stated why he didn't want to do business with them. He'd have been on stronger standing had he simply refused service with no explanation.
Yea, maybe jokers was a bad choice. But still, hardly an attempt to seize control of the government.
It’s not a show. Declaring a new capitol of Israel was a big step. It was big enough fir every dem to complain what they could about it. The declarations by Arab countries is huge. Big enough another guy couldn’t do it in 40yrs there. It’s a stepping stone and a process to bring others in. With four signed countries it can grow. It’s a monumental feat. Don’t forget stepping down on NK that sent our POW’s remains home, stopping foreign flow to Iran cranking up their inflation, exiting the climate deal that cost a ton and did nothing, scrubbed ISIS from the maps, lowered illegal immigration by making Mexico get more involved, and being the only president since the 90s that hasn’t started a war... oh and that impossible vaccine that wouldn’t happen for 3 or 4yrs that’s already being rolled out by the millions that people are still finding something to complain about.
Are you effing kidding me? They wanted to kill the VP, the Speaker of the House so that a lame duck president could remain in office!!! That is EXACTLY TRYING TO SEIZE CONTROL OF THE GOVERNMENT.
That’s exactly what it was. Again go read Parler and thedonald.win for yourself.
Actually, they did.
www.cnet.com
Not to seize the govt, It was an attempt by trump to stay in power against the majority of Americans. Yeah, zero chance of success but that's how delusional it was.
That's the problem right here. You're choosing to decide that statement is intended to incite violence. People speak figuratively all the time. That is why censorship fails, because not you nor anyone else is capable of wielding it in a responsible manner.
Really? Because they have it on video folks looking for Pence and Pelosi to hang and cut off their head respectively. So that's 2 and 3 from the succession leaving Donald.
You say THEY like it was the entire crowd, like everyone was carrying guns and bombs. I dunno, thats like saying BLM protestors were all out there to cause damage and loot.
This is not even close to the same thing. Apple removing an app that doesn’t meet App Store guidelines is not the same as the Supreme Court rubber-stamping discrimination against LGBT Americans.
You could be right. My take is Trump wanted to stay being president by having the votes sent back too the states. But his MAGA followers wanted to hang Congress.
