kids on Tik Tok made fun of the president, so Trump and conservatives wanted to ban it. But when conservatives using an app to plot deadly attacks on American soil, they think it’s unfair to ask to moderate said criminal activites.
You literally don't know what you're talking about.This is wrong no matter what your politics. The guarantee of free speech in the First Amendment isn't about speech you agree with, it's about the ability for others you don't agree with to speak. You aren't required to agree with what they say. And labeling opposition speech across the board as "hateful" is a straw dog. Also, the idea that these platforms are private doesn't wash when they hold a near-monopoly on communications (especially when they collaborate like Twitter, Apple, Google, and Facebook have done).
This is a very creepy place we are going into. The next step down the road is internet restriction and monitoring. And don't think for a moment if your politics are on the "good" side they won't come for you next. There were many in the French Revolution who thought the Jacobins would never come after them -- but after they ran out of their real enemies, they did.
Regardless how you feel about Trump, this is a scary place we're headed...
Proof? And did you report the offensive tweets to Twitter? Or did you just come here to complain?
It was trending because of the disgusting videos of rioting Trumpers demanding Pence be hanged. Accounts weren't advocating it, they were calling it out.Well when Twitter is seeing “Hang Mike Pence” trending why wouldn’t Twitter self police and ban those accounts as well?
Well said! They are whiny, snowflake hypocrites through and through. Sometimes they get whipped up into a frenzy and try to stage a coup. Thankfully, they were too stupid and unplanned to pull it off. But we got lucky, this time. The next few weeks, and I'm afraid, years, will have to involve mopping up this garbage, and throwing it into a very deep pit, forever.kids on Tik Tok made fun of the president, so Trump and conservatives wanted to ban it. But conservatives using an app to plot deadly attacks on American soil, they think it’s unfair to ask to moderate said criminal activites.
Do your eyes work?If Parler spreads hate so much why has there been no riots or anything from trump supporters in the 4 years and why when he lost did nothing happen and this was a one off which was bad, with the same logic your using they should ban twitter because it spread a lot of blm lies and hate that caused a summer of hell
There are so many Republican, Libertarian, and otherwise right-wing people on Twitter, myself included. It's not "hearing only one side."Disgusting work apple, why not remove twitter with people like the leader of Iran threatening to wipe israel off the map, all social media has bad on it, they really are banning all freedom of speech of any conservatives; all what is left is the radical left, it’s not healthy to only hear one side
What u on about everything I’ve said is the trump you couldn’t debate me with factsDo your eyes work?
What a pithy quote that means absolutely nothing.So much for Apple's freedom of speech principles, only when it fits their agenda.
That's not proof of calls of violence. If you had actually looked at the tweets on Twitter, you'd know it was trending because people were calling out the videos of Trumpers screaming it on Wednesday.![]()
'Hang Mike Pence' trends on Twitter after platform suspends Trump for risk of 'incitement of violence'
Twitter has removed content from "trending" in the past when it violates its rules.www.foxnews.com
Well, for starters, this guy still has a Twitter account.Proof? And did you report the offensive tweets to Twitter? Or did you just come here to complain?
Yeah the leader of Iran calls for israelWell, for starters, this guy still has a Twitter account.
The ACLU, no fan of Trump, disagrees.You do not have a right to unlimited free speech. There are a hundred limits on speech, from copyright to sedition. People need to understand that, and Apple is well within their right to limit speech. Twitter did a great post analyzing his language and his incitement of insurrection, when they banned him.
The left can tweet things like I hope trump dies and gets away with it but when the right tweet anything they get banned it’s not equal rights; apple has become woke like the rest of the company’s, they can’t silence the president of America it’s wrong
Well said.There are so many Republican, Libertarian, and otherwise right-wing people on Twitter, myself included. It's not "hearing only one side."
Also, if Parler is an anything-goes platform, that conflicts with the App Store rules, and that's always been the case. I've had to abide by them when submitting my own apps.
What u on about everything I’ve said is the trump you couldn’t debate me with facts
I could. Honest question, though. Would it make a lick of difference?
They never had any free speech principles and never claimed to. These are their rules on content, which have been basically the same since the App Store was created.So much for Apple's freedom of speech principles, only when it fits their agenda.
1.1 Objectionable Content
Apps should not include content that is offensive, insensitive, upsetting, intended to disgust, in exceptionally poor taste, or just plain creepy. Examples of such content include:
- 1.1.1 Defamatory, discriminatory, or mean-spirited content, including references or commentary about religion, race, sexual orientation, gender, national/ethnic origin, or other targeted groups, particularly if the app is likely to humiliate, intimidate, or harm a targeted individual or group. Professional political satirists and humorists are generally exempt from this requirement.
- 1.1.2 Realistic portrayals of people or animals being killed, maimed, tortured, or abused, or content that encourages violence. “Enemies” within the context of a game cannot solely target a specific race, culture, real government, corporation, or any other real entity.
- 1.1.3 Depictions that encourage illegal or reckless use of weapons and dangerous objects, or facilitate the purchase of firearms or ammunition.
- 1.1.4 Overtly sexual or pornographic material, defined by Webster’s Dictionary as "explicit descriptions or displays of sexual organs or activities intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings."
- 1.1.5 Inflammatory religious commentary or inaccurate or misleading quotations of religious texts.
- 1.1.6 False information and features, including inaccurate device data or trick/joke functionality, such as fake location trackers. Stating that the app is “for entertainment purposes” won’t overcome this guideline. Apps that enable anonymous or prank phone calls or SMS/MMS messaging will be rejected.
I don't think he's a radical leftist.Well, for starters, this guy still has a Twitter account.