ds2000
macrumors 6502a
M1 Pro Max here and zero interest in upgrading.No one needs M3. M1 is good enough. 😆
M1 Pro Max here and zero interest in upgrading.No one needs M3. M1 is good enough. 😆
I always had a soft spot for the good old 6502…No one needs M3. M1 is good enough. 😆
„I don’t need it, so no one does“No one needs M5. M3 was good enough.
they already have, it just flew under the radarm1 max was just too good. rare under promise, over deliver moment for apple. m5/6 gonna need to be something special to win us m1 max users over.
The 040 was an amazing chip (as used in the AV Quadras - absolute beasts of machines for their day). It did run a little hot, though.No one needs the M1. The Motorola 68040 is good enough.
I somewhat agree, however I see Apple go the following route:I think that the OLED touch screen laptops will be and additional new line (eg MBP Ultra) and not replace the current MBPs.
Touchscreen on laptops is niche, Windows has taught us that much.
Probably, but come to think of it, the current generations of all MacBooks didn’t have any noticeable revisions YoY, no keyboard redesign, no display flex cable issues, no popping or short circuiting speakers, no problems with glued in batteries. Nothing, really. No wide spread defects or anything that I can think of.It’s not obsolete months later. In fact, I’m considering whether I should wait for the M6 or not… even if I think Apple is not going to repeat the errors of the 2016 MBP, there will be some drawbacks with the new design.
The Osborne Effect refers to a manufacturer, not rumors, telling people about an update long before its release. Due to sales of the V1 plummeting, they weren’t able to adequately finance the V2.I don’t believe it either. If this is true then the first release may not sell, as people will wait for the better release.
Remember the Osborne effect?
I would be more pissed to wait longer. The M5 Max chip is important for running AI models locally.Way to entirely piss of a premium customer base is to release a model and then "obsolete" it months later. I really don't believe this is true, they should just shelve the first upgrade.
The 4S didn't have the hardware for AirDrop so while one of Apple’s best phones, it wasn’t perfect.No one needed iPhone 5-17, 4s was perfect!
iPad 3 has entered the chat.Way to entirely piss of a premium customer base is to release a model and then "obsolete" it months later. I really don't believe this is true, they should just shelve the first upgrade.
The iPad 3 was, tho. Sales fell off a cliff and took 10 years to recover only after reshaping the entire product line. So much trust and goodwill was lost in October that year when “the new iPad” was released.It’s not obsolete months later. In fact, I’m considering whether I should wait for the M6 or not… even if I think Apple is not going to repeat the errors of the 2016 MBP, there will be some drawbacks with the new design.
Same. I have the 16" with 64gb of ram.M1 Pro Max here and zero interest in upgrading.
Way to entirely piss of a premium customer base is to release a model and then "obsolete" it months later. I really don't believe this is true, they should just shelve the first upgrade.
Except that the M5 Pro/Max is expected "real soon now" and the rumors for the M6/OLED model are saying late 2026 or maybe 2027 so we'd still be looking at the best part of a year.Way to entirely piss of a premium customer base is to release a model and then "obsolete" it months later.
M1 Pro Max here and zero interest in upgrading.
...and if you read up on it, even that probably wasn't the sole cause of Osborne's failure. A rich, well-established company like Apple isn't going to be brought down by rumors causing a temporary sales slump.The Osborne Effect refers to a manufacturer, not rumors, telling people about an update long before its release.
Well, they could just throw it in as a "tick list" feature - it's quite common for PC laptop makers to bundle a touch screen if you go for the higher-end display options - at scale it probably wouldn't add much to the bill-of-materials. Wouldn't be a killer feature or useful as a primary UI, but it would be handy for various niches iOS/iPad developers, DAW/virtual instrument software etc.For those who think Apple will just "equip a MacBook with a touch screen" and be done with it might be in for a surprise.
I was going to upgrade to the M5, but then heard the M6 will be launched months to a year after the M5 so I guess I will force myself to endure the M4. Last thing I want is to endure getting the M5 Pro or Max.What's the alternative? Skipping the M5? Then those "pissed off" customers would be even worse, having bought an M4 shortly before the M6.
Or intentionally delaying the M6? That would just add a whole new group of people buying the older version shortly before it's updated. They'd be "pissed off", too, if they heard that Apple was intentionally withholding the new version from them.
Early updates always leave more people with actual benefits than with imaginary losses.
Why stop there with that logic? Surely you would agree, no one needs M3 either.No one needs M5. M3 was good enough.
Clearly you're a visionary of blindness.Mac touch screen = Touch Bar = Trashcan Mac. All stupid ideas in search of a problem to solve.
You can’t draw on a MBP screen, it’s vertical, and the hinge is too weak to withstand the pressure. Also, the targets in macOS are designed for a cursor, not a finger or pencil.
Such a dumb idea.
It's almost as if you're unaware that touch screen laptops have been around for 20+ years except in the Apple bubble.I don't think adding a touchscreen warrants redesigning the whole OS and apps to become touch-first, and I really hope that is not what they're planning.