This has been a rare failure by Apple. I can't see why they didn't see this coming. They need to come off their high horse.
Make a black one and double your sales by targeting guys as well as teen girls...
Or at least grey.
Proof that people don't want a still way to expensive "Cheap" iPhone,
they want a cheap-'ER' iPhone period !.
Apple should have just released the 5s, but cut the price by $150-$200, more phones in people hands, more profits via the extras and iTunes store app purchases.
The "c" is still to expensive to be considered a "Cheap" phone, and its not that big a jump to a "s".
Now, had apple got the "c" out there at the $350 mark "off the shelf" sim free, or free with a 12 month contract... i could have seen myself picking up a "c" as a refresh if the price was around that $350 sim free, so when my contract renews i get the 6 for free, but in the meantime i get a new phone for the year.
I'm confused why so many responses in this thread keep referring to the iPhone 5c as a "cheap" phone. Apple has never said anything of the kind, nor have they marketed that way. Where are you guys getting this from?
The troll responses in this thread are going to reach ridiculous levels.
I'll field this one.
1) I enjoy the colored back of the phone. It brings a splash of color to a line of products that has been dull for so long.
2) The rounded polycarbonate back of the phone is more pleasant to look at and hold as compared to the cold, industrial looking and feeling 5s.
3) I saved $100 by going with the 5c. That money allowed me to purchase Applecare+ for my phone.
4) I'm not the shallow sort of individual that cares what other people think about the phone I use. I mean, really? Grow up, people. If you think my phone is "cheap-looking" I don't really care. Whatever makes you feel superior, man.
Its plastic. Never mind there's a thread in the iPhone forum full of 5C owners who love the device and don't consider it "cheap". It's plastic so that automatically makes it "cheap". The only time Apple plastic products aren't cheap is when Steve Jobs is on stage announcing them.
No surprise for me due to the mere $100 difference from this cheap plastic phone to the 5s. Would the 5c had been available at $350-$400 tops (and $0 on contract in the US) it would have done better.
But, this shows that Apple execs are still living inside their magical bubble.
This has been a rare failure by Apple. I can't see why they didn't see this coming. They need to come off their high horse.
Failure? Firstly this is just a rumour. Secondly if it is true they are still producing just under 5 million 5c's a month. We also have no idea about the production ramp, this could well have been part of the plan all along.
Report: Apple slashes CDMA iPhone 4 production in half
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsav...tells-iphone-parts-makers-to-delay-shipments/"Apple has told iPhone 4S parts suppliers to delay part of their calendar Q4 shipments into the first quarter as sales of the iPhone 4S have not been as strong as those concluded in the pre-sales period"
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsav...iphone-5-production-cuts-suggest-soft-demand/Apple: Do iPhone 5 Production Cuts Suggest Soft Demand?
Apple overestimated 5c's potential.
I think most people saw through that it's really just a repackaged 5.
I've only seen ONE 5C in the wild, and that was a bubblegum pink 5C a female customer of mine had at my work.
3) I saved $100 by going with the 5c. That money allowed me to purchase Applecare+ for my phone.
I've only seen ONE 5C in the wild, and that was a bubblegum pink 5C a female customer of mine had at my work.
By that logic, does that make the 4s less of a "cheap" phone than the 5c?
I'm perplexed.
Quite possible that Apple intentionally hurt scalpers. Build 5Cs above demand, so that all the scalpers will lose money - once the phones are available plentifully, nobody is going to pay full price from a scalper, and most people will try to take advantage and offer much less than full price to someone desperately needing to get rid of a stash of 5cs.
Why are you guys so afraid of color?![]()
The troll responses in this thread are going to reach ridiculous levels.
I'll field this one.
1) I enjoy the colored back of the phone. It brings a splash of color to a line of products that has been dull for so long.
2) The rounded polycarbonate back of the phone is more pleasant to look at and hold as compared to the cold, industrial looking and feeling 5s.
3) I saved $100 by going with the 5c. That money allowed me to purchase Applecare+ for my phone.
4) I'm not the shallow sort of individual that cares what other people think about the phone I use. I mean, really? Grow up, people. If you think my phone is "cheap-looking" I don't really care. Whatever makes you feel superior, man.
Not afraid of colour (though white isn't really a colour either) - I just prefer a black phone and like the body to match the glass panels on the front, also so as not to distract from the screen.
The only reason I can see that Apple didn't make a black version (as they have with every previous iPhone) is because it might take sales from the "grown up" 5S.
And the number of 5s phones you've seen in the wild?