YessssssBut but but... Apple doesn't innovate anymore (according to the majority here), right?
The iPhone 6 and 16 Pro Max are the exact same Phone
And a 120$ android can beat iPhone
YessssssBut but but... Apple doesn't innovate anymore (according to the majority here), right?
But but but... Apple doesn't innovate anymore (according to the majority here), right?
This is in line with the auto HDR feature they do today... they might start with the pro phones but if they can achieve it well there's no way they hold it back from the consumer in the long run. This would be too big to hold for an upsell... it has much more potential as a mass market "wow the iPhone takes better pictures than all other phones".They should diverge the lines and let the Pro phones really go wild in this direction.
This is in line with the auto HDR feature they do today... they might start with the pro phones but if they can achieve it well there's no way they hold it back from the consumer in the long run. This would be too big to hold for an upsell... it has much more potential as a mass market "wow the iPhone takes better pictures than all other phones".
And it is a generally accurate thing to say. If and when it actually releases a product with this sensor, and if this sensor actually delivers on its promises, we can revisit this statement. But for now it is just vapourware: nothing has even been announced, and Apple has managed to delay or even cancel announced products in the past, let alone unannounced ones.But but but... Apple doesn't innovate anymore (according to the majority here), right?
Smaller could mean thinner. That seems to be the primary axis of desired shrinkage as originally driven by Steve. These phones are HUGE in width and length, with all other internals constantly shrinking. They may yet be able to fit larger photosites in there (on a larger area sensor) while working toward a sheet of glass model.A stacked sensor would be a nice upgrade, but the fact that they're trying to make it smaller to save space means any hope of a 1" sensor is gone, for now at least.
Yea, in 12 years when competition will release something superiorMainly cost cutting, like with the own C1 modem, but could finally lead to a real innovation!
And it a generally accurate thing to say. If and when actually actually releases a product with this sensor, and if this sensor il actually delivers on its promises we can revisit this statement. But for now it is just vapourware: nothing has even just been announced, and Apple has managed to delay or even cancelled announced products in the past, let alone una bounced ones.
Apple is doing this so they can save $$. Making their own parts means the money they spent paying Sony, Samsung, etc. will stay in house. More money for them (and the shareholders).I wonder what does Apple do differently to make them smaller? It isn't like Sony is bad at sensors.
I literally wish my 15 Pro took better photos.I know of not a single person, litereally, who has an iPhone from the last couple years that has ever once said anything to the effect of "I wish my iPhone took better photos".
Complaints about the processing are examples of people wishing their phones took better photos, because the processing is there to mask image quality issues. A larger sensor, or a better sensor will reduce the severity of the processing, and therefore make the phone take better photos.About the only complaints I hear about are the over aggressive processing Apple enforces on stock Camera App pics (which I guarantee is what 99% of users use and always will, so it does matter for sure).
I think that the image sensors are currently too small in most cameras.
More light is generally better.
Apple has said they want to control everything in-house. Yes it will cost R&D but in the long run it is more control apple will have which ultimately will lead to cost savings (for them anyway, not the end users). It's why they tried to use Intel modems to get off Qualcomm (and had to come crawling back).I love the comments about this being a cost-saving measure, as if Apple is developing a rumored new camera sensor because it's cheap.
How does anyone here know this sensor is cheaper? How much is Apple paying Sony for their sensors now? Now compare that to the R&D that Apple would have put into this (rumored) sensor, and tell us how much they will cost to make, plus the costs of engineering new camera modules and writing new software for these (rumored) sensors.
As they say on math tests, show your work. And if you don't actually have facts, it's okay to say you don't know. Let's see if anyone replies with facts.
I love the comments about this being a cost-saving measure, as if Apple is developing a rumored new camera sensor because it's cheap.
How does anyone here know this sensor is cheaper? How much is Apple paying Sony for their sensors now? Now compare that to the R&D that Apple would have put into this (rumored) sensor, and tell us how much they will cost to make, plus the costs of engineering new camera modules and writing new software for these (rumored) sensors.
As they say on math tests, show your work. And if you don't actually have facts, it's okay to say you don't know. Let's see if anyone replies with facts.
Apple has said they want to control everything in-house. Yes it will cost R&D but in the long run it is more control apple will have which ultimately will lead to cost savings (for them anyway, not the end users). It's why they tried to use Intel modems to get off Qualcomm (and had to come crawling back).
Apple is doing this so they can save $$
So no factual information to back up your claim that:
Got it.
They don't' if you wanna see actual innovation, look at Chinese phone makers. Yes they copy other manufactures but they also do things other manufactures like Apple, Samsung don't do.But but but... Apple doesn't innovate anymore (according to the majority here), right?
And you have no factual information that they are doing it for any other reasons, either.
See how this works?
I don't care about iPhone (or any phone) cameras, really, but this is interesting. It wouldn't make me upgrade, but I'd like to see something better than what the iPhone currently has.
What I expect, however, is just bringing this in-house like the C1..aka not any better, but cheaper.
It might make sense to wait until they've actually released something before crediting Apple with some amazing innovation...But but but... Apple doesn't innovate anymore (according to the majority here), right?
I agree for all the phones except the Pros. Honestly comparing the 16 and 16 Pro you have to ask what is even the point of the pro but to get people to spend more money. They were essentially the same phone. If you have a "Pro" designation, why not actually make it for professionals? Let's push the boundaries of the what cameras on phones can do both from a hardware and software perspective.The camera is WAY beyond great for nearly every type of user.
The percentage of folks who are needing/wanting even more out of it are a tiny fraction.