TheYayAreaLiving 🎗️
Suspended
iMac will forever be iconic! I honestly prefer the old 2020 iMac design.Such ugly design!
iMac will forever be iconic! I honestly prefer the old 2020 iMac design.Such ugly design!
I just want a 32"+ (5k or higher res) stand-alone display at no more than $2.5k.
That's what I think, too. I wouldn't be surprised that Apple drops even the 24" iMac in favor people buying the Mac mini and separate 24 to 28 inch Thunderbolt port display.This is just stupid at this point. Most of us will have had to transition to a Mac Studio and display before that happens. I was holding out for an imac but like holding out til this fall…
Sunflower design FTW in my book.iMac will forever be iconic! I honestly prefer the old 2020 iMac design.
Afraid of a bargain all-in-one iMac compared to your Mac studio? Thats always possible. It's like comparing the Mac mini with a M2 Pro vs M2 Max Studio. Different solutions for different consumers is what Apple should always provide.There are too many Macs now, including Mac mini, Mac Studio, Mac Pro: tower and rack. Also, sales of ioda Oro will slice off some off the Mac line up.
I have waited too long for an iMac, now I got the Mac studio and Apple Display.
Do edge to edge display like the 16" MBP using the 27" form factor can fit a 29.5" display. Those bezels on the past 27" iMacs was pretty sizable. So yeah Apple's next larger AS iMac doesn't have to be that much larger to accommodate larger displays.30 inches could be a 21:9 ultrawide with the same height as the 24".![]()
5K at that size would perfect!Do edge to edge display like the 16" MBP using the 27" form factor can fit a 29.5" display. Those bezels on the past 27" iMacs was pretty sizable. So yeah Apple's next larger AS iMac doesn't have to be that much larger to accommodate larger displays.
View attachment 2223868
Do the math. If it is >30“, it will be probably 32“. With retina resolution (and Apple won’t go below that), it will be a 6K display. The only 6K display on the market besides the XDR Pro is the new Dell, which is 3K$ for the display alone. So yes, 4K for the machine you describe would be very reasonable indeed, by anyone‘s standards.
Same here. I think a lot of us feel this way. I just pulled the trigger on a Studio Display and Mac Studio.Agree completely. Am about to replace my 2017 Intel 27-inch 5k iMac in favor of, yep, a Mac Studio M2 Max and Studio Display. Would’ve gladly replaced it with an Apple Silicon version of what I have, had such a thing ever existed.
Is it me or is apple just so out of touch with its buyers they choose to make things so expensive no one even bats an eye when they move on after they see the price.Starting price: $3,999 w/ 16gb RAM and 250GB SSD.
"Reasonable" by MacRumors standards.
There are lots of sizes over 30". It doesn't have to be 32". 29.x" monitors have hit the market in the past too. Basically, Apple can choose whatever size it wants to choose.Do the math. If it is >30“, it will be probably 32“. With retina resolution (and Apple won’t go below that), it will be a 6K display. The only 6K display on the market besides the XDR Pro is the new Dell, which is 3K$ for the display alone. So yes, 4K for the machine you describe would be very reasonable indeed, by anyone‘s standards.
8GB memory and 1TB HDD / 256GB SSD Fusion Drive 🤣I foresee no possible way to get back to the sub $2K "starting at" price point of the Intel iMac 27." I see only ONE path to MAYBE get to a "starting at" of $2999.
That's exactly what I did. Bought the Mac Studio on launch day and my studio display yesterday.This is just stupid at this point. Most of us will have had to transition to a Mac Studio and display before that happens. I was holding out for an imac but like holding out til this fall…
The iMac is more of a lifestyle product. It looks nice, not a lot of cables. Just a simple computing device, ready for the tasks of the day.Great to have more options, but I am a bit surprised Apple has so many desktop models. I think the Mac mini and Mac Studio already cover about everyone. Is the iMac market really still there?
Well Apple does no-interest time payments for their stuff. That's something. $100 a month for 2.5 years and it's mine.Is it me or is apple just so out of touch with its buyers they choose to make things so expensive no one even bats an eye when they move on after they see the price.
Exactly. There’s a market but not okento warrantnthe frequency of updates everyone in this forum expects.Great to have more options, but I am a bit surprised Apple has so many desktop models. I think the Mac mini and Mac Studio already cover about everyone. Is the iMac market really still there?
Yeah, I have seen that, also there is a Dell 6k display but damn, what an ugly display with that gigantic bezel on the top. Plus the build quality looks cheap.Dell 5K 2K Ultra-Wide looks like an iMac screen vertically but with much more width. I have 20:20 eyes and don't notice a difference vs. my former iMac 27"... except the width. There are spec differences but spec extremes don't typically apply to real world use.
Priced about the same as ASD (but gets as low as about $1400 in the refurb store) and comes with a KVM hub with many 2023 useful ports built in, not just a few of one type of port... and FOUR video inputs in case you would like to use it with more than only a Mac (I have a Mac-Mini like PC to deliver real Windows (not ARM Windows) to one of the other inputs for "old fashioned bootcamp"). You can even split screen it to have Mac on the left and whatever you want on the right. Or rotate the screen for a very tall portrait setup.
Having used this with my Mac for a year now, I could never go back to 16:10. Ultra-wide is just too useful.
You forgot the "/s"Do the math. If it is >30“, it will be probably 32“. With retina resolution (and Apple won’t go below that), it will be a 6K display. The only 6K display on the market besides the XDR Pro is the new Dell, which is 3K$ for the display alone. So yes, 4K for the machine you describe would be very reasonable indeed, by anyone‘s standards.