Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As several posters have mentioned previously, one has to wonder what type of original programming would be "pure" enough to be Apple labeled.

Cook and company are so disgustingly politically correct in every aspect of their operation, it is extremely difficult to imagine an Apple produced "House of Cards" or "Orange is the New Black", etc.

There is no way to produce sharp, edgy, relevant and/or witty content if the rule is "Offend No-one".
Offend no one? Ha. I'm sure one of Apple's first productions would be about either global warming or gay rights and that would offend plenty of people.
 
The problem I would envision is putting an Apple brand or endorsement on whatever production facility was created. Just look at their policies with regard to approving/rejecting apps. Would they be willing to be associated with an original production such as "The Brink", an HBO original series?

I think it depends on how it is produced. I don't think there will be Apple Movies Studios or whatever like that. They for example could just inject money in Miramax (now sold just for 1 billion dollars), and Miramax would make all those series and comedies.

It may have some hidden Apple agenda, like promoting Macs, for example, but they already do it, don't they, through product placement? So what's the problem?

I don't think that content creation is necessarily a best idea in the world, especially for hardware and services company like Apple, but hey Sony does it successfully, so why not Apple? Its a part of their ecosystem, its in their genes through ties of Jobs with Pixar, thats why they discontinued Aperture but created movie-oriented Pro Macs and continue to invest in Final Cut Pro. Essentially, they are Hollywoods' hardware/software supplier already.
 
Last edited:
Well, for largest company in the world, they are incredibly focused. Just one model of smartphone at a time, one desktop, one all in all, few notebooks, few tablets. Thats all in hardware. In software, few Pro apps. A big online store, one for everything, but thats it. It is not spread too much in any business sense. If Apple had hotels, electric machinery, insurance (like Sony), TVs, construction, real estate, etc, yes, you could say its a bit diversified, but that because most large companies, and Apple IS the largest in the world, do invest in various industries to avoid being tied a single industry. But Apple is not really that much diversified. Most of its income comes from smartphones.


You're correct that the vast majority of their profits come from the iPhone line, but I don't think that really makes them a focused company. Virtually all of Googles profits come from search but I don't think you'd find too many people that would describe them as focused in the same sense that people typically mean about Apple.

Apple has always been known as the company that takes its time and gets it right. With this, you know that when you buy an Apple product that you can, at minimum expect it to work correctly, and at best you might be amazed at how good it is.

Lately I'm feeling a lot more Apple products are being pushed out the door to meet a deadline rather than releasing them when they are great. It's not like I'm about to jump ship and go buy a Samsung, and I'm extremely happy with my iPhone, but some of the software/services lately haven't lived up to my expectations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CalWizrd
You're correct that the vast majority of their profits come from the iPhone line, but I don't think that really makes them a focused company. Virtually all of Googles profits come from search but I don't think you'd find too many people that would describe them as focused in the same sense that people typically mean about Apple.

Apple has always been known as the company that takes its time and gets it right. With this, you know that when you buy an Apple product that you can, at minimum expect it to work correctly, and at best you might be amazed at how good it is.

Lately I'm feeling a lot more Apple products are being pushed out the door to meet a deadline rather than releasing them when they are great. It's not like I'm about to jump ship and go buy a Samsung, and I'm extremely happy with my iPhone, but some of the software/services lately haven't lived up to my expectations.

Fair enough
 
This to me is another example of how Apple will try something new, and try as they might, have a lot to loose if they fail.

iTunes already is the one stop shop for most when it comes to Music, Movies, Apps, and Games. I would tend to think that this would be another spin off like Pixar, where Apple will hire the best talent for story writers, animators, directors, producers, etc. And because they have a budget that is "Money is no object" mentality, progress should be no problem.

However, much like you have not many good movies these days anyways, where Hollywood would give birth more often to reboots, I will hope that Apple will stray from that. In fact, make it a rule - "don't do remakes, don't do reboots". Good content sells.

Now the end game here that I can see where this is going; while Apple is slowly working on getting into the cell phone service game, its going to come to the Bandwidth of things. Apple can most likely succeed because if they manage to score the cell phone service, and offer unlimited bandwidth to cell phone customers ..(here is the catch ) for all Apple Services, then for everyone who will own a iDevice, you will win.

End game - Apple will offer now than ever because all those iphones and ipads with data, will basically now work even more seemlessly without any other excuse of third party data providers like Verizon/Comcast/TMobile.
Now if they can bump up the free iCloud storage, they will have something here.
In fact...Google is doing this already....

#projectfi https://fi.google.com/about/experience/
 
Not a fan of this at all. Apple doesn't need original content and Eddy Cue should be focused on making iCloud, Apple Music and Siri best in class. They're not right now. If he really wants to do this then Apple should spin off Beats into its own company and Cue can go run it. Then Cook can poach someone from Google, Microsoft or Amazon that really understands internet services.
I see this as a conflict of interest.

"Hey ABC/CBS/FOX/WB/Disney, come join Apple Studios on our newest device! We're in direct competition, so we'll give you a discount."

But then again, Netflix does this already.
 
Almost there. They will brag that they "revolutionized movie making".
And Apple could never run out of ideas. This is just one project by one of Apple's teams.

Do you think the military would be interested in partnering with Apple if they didn't have anything worth for them?
Apple's R&D is huge! Not all projects may see light of day now, but in the future, who knows.
Well, Microsoft has the government and Sega has the slot machines industry. But movie making? I have the feeling Apple should have something like Google Drive, but a serious proposal, no like Numbers that look like a toy.

Actually, I would see more factible Apple developing a Youtube like website, that would rock.
 
Well, Microsoft has the government and Sega has the slot machines industry. But movie making? I have the feeling Apple should have something like Google Drive, but a serious proposal, no like Numbers that look like a toy.

I use Numbers for spreadsheets and it works fine. iCloud also works fine, and I have a couple of my own folders there. Its also much more economical compared to Dropbox.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amazing Iceman
How about both?
More could be achieved if they focused on one. Everyone else is making new content, so let's find a way to put it all together in one device amicably. It's not like Apple is creating new music with Justin Bieber, so why does it need to make new TV?
 
Right but you can get it just about anywhere. Will people pay for exclusive content from Apple that is only on iTunes/TV?

Now they can get it just anywhere. That wasn't really the case like 10 years ago. Back then it was only through cable companies. So it's not inconceivable that people would pay for exclusive content from iTunes/TV, especially since the idea is that people are buying the AppleTV /anyway/.
 
Great. So Apple is getting into the the entertainment industry. That worked really well for Sony.

Meanwhile, the Finder doesn't auto-size columns so that one can actually see long file names, nor is their a preference setting that enables this. And the last 2 updates of OS X nearly destroyed my system, causing me to have to use Time Machine to reconstruct things, costing me an entire work day in the end on each occasion.

So, Apple, expand into new territory if you wish, but pull your finger out and start making the software and hardware reliable again.

It actually did turn out well for Sony. Sony had many problems (has, still but it's getting better) and its problem with entertainment wasn't its entry into it, but its reliance on it. Apple is not going to rely on entertainment. As I think either a 9to5 or CoM article said recently, hardware is the car. Software/entertainment/etc. is the engine to sell the car.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
I guess apple is looking in every direction to keep up the revenue stream in the future.

Consumer electronics has reached the point where cheaper brands can deliver the basics of what the average joe can expect from a modern phone, tablet or computer.
 
Don't worry. Apple will never tank its EPS by buying a company as unprofitable and huge as NetFlix. It is never going to happen. And except for the NetFlix original programming Apple has much better content available to it already on iTunes. And it has customers willing to pay cash per show for that content. iTunes video sales probably makes Apple more profit every month than NetFlix makes all year.

I think the future is that the streaming all you can eat services will continue to live on Apple TV. You the consumer will browse for a show or movie. If the show or movie is available on two services that you already subscribe to you can decide between renting the ad-free one from Apple or watching one with ads on Hulu. Most stuff will only be available on one ad supported version and the ad-free one from Apple bought individually (or some other premium service like HBO and possibly Apple with a fairly high monthly fee). My guess is that NetFlix's catalog is going to diminish in size and the best stuff remaining will be their occasional self produced hit.

This idea of shopping around for the same content resides in Google Search and would be wonderful to implement on Apple TV if possible.
 
There was a time when I thought Apple should do something like this. That time probably passed about 2 years ago. Right now Apple is just doing too much. This is probably the reason Apple has released nothing but sub par software for a few years now. Here are some examples:

1. Apple Maps- Although I use Apple maps and I have very few issues with it, it could be much better and it says something that it actually generated an apology from the company as well as the firing of a top exec.

2. Apple Music- I'm a paying streaming customer. I used Spotify. Being a loyal Apple customer I switched to Beats when Apple bought them and although it was missing a few features (namely a queue) the product was great. In many ways it was better than Spotify. The UI was better and frankly just made more sense. It organized albums and songs much better than Spotify as well. So naturally when Apple announced Apple Music I was excited. I was going to get some of the features that were missing in Beats, a bigger library of songs, and I'd be able to merge my iTunes library with my streaming library. There were even rumors it might be cheaper.

I've had problems from the very start of using Apple Music. Although I eventually got it, at first I couldn't import my Beats library into AM. Then as I began to use it I realized that the AM interface was a little confusing and in my opinion, a step backwards from Beats. Beats had great organization for albums and songs. It organized an artists albums chronologically and it put the release date by the album so that you could explore an artist and have some context. Beats also had tabs for things like compilations and EPs. By separating this I could go look up an older artist like the Talking Heads and get a much better idea of their discography on Beats than I currently can on AM.

The last thing I will say about AM is that I have had more issues with bugs than I've ever had with any other piece of Apple software. I have to restart my phone multiple times a day. It's constantly asking me to sign up as a paying member although I am already signed up. Needless to say, "it just works" doesn't seem to apply to this product. It sucks because they forced me to leave a product that did work. I intend to stick with it for the time being, but Apple really needs to work out some issues.

3. iCloud- Although this has gotten better it's still not good. I was especially excited for the new release of photos because I was hopeful that it would allow me to better organize my library on all my devices. Unfortunately there still isn't very good tools for organizing photos how you want them. I still have to save a photo to the "all photos" album and then copy it into the album that I actually want it in. Apple should allow us to have more control over the albums instead of just having these defaults and then they should have a "save to" button that allows us to choose which album we want to put the image in.


These are just a few examples, but with Apple working on desktops, laptops, watches, phones, ipods, Apple Pay, cars, iPads, streaming, iCloud, yearly software upgrades, Siri, Apple TV, etc. The last thing I want to hear is that they are now trying to produce some content. They've been moving quickly into a lot of areas and I think it's come at the expense of quality. They need to refocus.

1. Apple Maps - was suckish on launch, which resulted in an apology and firing. But it's gotten much better and quite frankly, it's used far more than Google Maps on iOS devices (Federighi). Not only that, but I personally never use Google Maps unless I have to use transit.

2. Apple Music - yeah, UI wise it's a slight step backwards from Beats, but that's mainly b/c of what they added that Beats did not. Quite frankly, I'm perfectly fine with it. Would I pay for it? Idk. But I don't pay for any other service.

3. iCloud - Photos isn't iCloud? Like, even iCloud Photos has nothing to do with organization. That's just a syncing service. I find iCloud itself perfectly adequate - certainly on par with everyone else.

So in the end, our opinions are quite different.
 
Can't believe the comments in here. Apple would be complete idiots not to go after everything media while they still have a hot brand. I'm not a huge fan of Apple's services, but they are making the right move here. Will they actully succeed at this, who knows? The original content better be good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
It actually did turn out well for Sony. Sony had many problems (has, still but it's getting better) and its problem with entertainment wasn't its entry into it, but its reliance on it. Apple is not going to rely on entertainment. As I think either a 9to5 or CoM article said recently, hardware is the car. Software/entertainment/etc. is the engine to sell the car.

All I know is that I see Apple appearing to be investing more in entertainment (e.g., Beats), and yet aspects of the software and hardware are clearly not getting enough attention. I need a stable high-performing computer, tablet and phone, not some radio station that charges to listen to it.
 
All I know is that I see Apple appearing to be investing more in entertainment (e.g., Beats), and yet aspects of the software and hardware are clearly not getting enough attention. I need a stable high-performing computer, tablet and phone, not some radio station that charges to listen to it.

Not enough attention? - well, thats a bit undefined. My macs, ipad and iphone perform flawlessly, more or less. Just yesterday tried to install Windows 7 - ugh what a mess, requires every other drive to be disconnected for simple installation...no way, MS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flaw600
Not enough attention? - well, thats a bit undefined.

Well, let me see: Poor user interface of the finder, impenetrable user-vindictive error messages, OS X updates that have nearly trashed my computer twice, iTunes failing to back up my iPhone supposedly because the phone has disconnected, jittering and freezing of iOS (admittedly I have an old phone but still), massive iOS updates that cause problems because of low phone memory, no meaningful increase in battery life of the iPhone, low battery life on Apple watch, no app store for Apple TV (yet), security holes in OS X, reduction in reliability of laptops, etc. Hopefully that's better defined for you.

I miss the old Apple - the company that paid attention to detail in user experience and quality control.

PS: read my signature - it's not like I am an Apple hater. I have used Apple products since the Lisa.
 
Apple - If you do this, use your influence and pile of cash to produce high quality sci-fi shows. We need a new Star Trek series. Buy the damn rights from CBS, and deliver it. While you are at it, buy and revive Stargate TV franchise as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StoneJack
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.