It'd be nice to have a 2 port USB-C Apple Charger. the 20W at $20 is a no-brainer for me. I've had one 30W Anker fail on me out of 5 or 6, but not one Apple charger in the last 15 years or so. I have Anker stuff and I like them but without any scientific evidence, I still just trust the Apple chargers more and I appreciate they are UL listed.
Agreed. To each his own but I'll just spend the extra bucks and not worry about replacements and such.I don’t quite understand the love for Anker, I think they’re over-rated. Perhaps it’s good marketing?
Before anybody jumps on me, I don’t think Anker is bad just not as great as some people think. Their failure rate seems pretty high (just read the Amazon reviews). But I’ll give them credit that they appear to replace stuff without argument. Personally I’ve had a DOA Anker battery, a cable which didn’t meet the published specs so didn’t charge at the higher speed and a cable which was supposed to be 4 inches but was only 2.5 including the plugs.
I neve said ANKER specifically. I really don't care who copies what as long as it isn't deemed patent or copyright infringement and even if something is, it's those companies problems if they think they have and they can take legal action they don't need forum posters help.
Apple using a technology that they didn't create or use in the past to make something similar to ANKER could be considere a form of copying.
Just like a few weeks ago all kinds of macrumors posters come and complain that Samsung copied spatial audio.
Just like Apple with updating their chargers they took an idea and are making a similar product feature but I'm sure in a different way and with different code so it's technically not copying in the eyes of the law.
I didn't hear anyone complaining in here that Apple stole the idea for noise cancelling headphones either and they aren't because the products are different.
My point is as both a tech and Apple fan I'm so tired of people having these brand biases. And yes you don't have to tell me that Samsung and Android fans don't do the same thing. It's dumb on both sides.
!Are there any drawbacks for these types for chargers? Sounds like a magical silver bullet... they are smaller and lighter, more power efficient and heats less, etc. Price maybe? Longevity?
Spoiler - there will likely be products in three years which won't charge optimally with Apple's chargers today. This is because the standards for power delivery over USB have been improving over time, and absorbing competitive technology with proprietary alternatives like Qualcomm's quickcharge. Once Apple has a charger that supports the new standard techniques, they add optimal support for it in their new products as well.You mean USB-C chargers that aren't compatible with their own products (29W charger and magsafe duo)?
You know, there's a chance Apple will move iPhones from lightning to USB-C because they can then cut including the cable in the box tooYou actually expect them to start including them again? Lol
Oof...if only that was the real reason.It's about time. With smaller chargers they can actually still include them in the box and be environmentally conscious. As we all know that's what the charger removal was about...
It's about time. With smaller chargers they can actually still include them in the box and be environmentally conscious. As we all know that's what the charger removal was about...
A forum doesn't do anything. Individual people do. The way you are framing your complaint is not just overly broad (who are we all acusing of copying what?) it doesn't make sense.oh but people in this forum can nitpick whenever a competitor does something similar to Apple and scream bloody murder then it's copying?
It's not patent infringement unless one side has a patent and the other infringes it.You can't have it both ways and clearly both sides are doing enough that it isn't patent infringement.
Biased people exist, some of them are likely on this forum, I'm not sure what point you are putting so much effort into making.I was making a point on how biased people in this forum are and you're just proving my point so thanks I guess.
Absolutely bullocks, my original apple charger that came with my mbp blew up in smoke while my Amazon lookalike still working just fine.a lot of people don’t realize the quality of Apple chargers far exceed many third party chargers http://www.righto.com/2012/05/apple-iphone-charger-teardown-quality.html
considering usb-c type chargers are a much more risky investment, $19 isn’t all that bad for a 20w
I’m fine with it if Apple include a token for every device they sell, you can use the token to get a charger whenever you need one.When will more countries be like Brazil and force Apple to include a charger?
Absolutely bullocks, my original apple charger that came with my mbp blew up in smoke while my Amazon lookalike still working just fine.
Do you have specific reasons why you think this is true?this days there is no difference between Apple and Quality charges
If it just throws some smoke and then die, that's actually a very good failure mode. Overheating is more dangerous, I'm guessing.Absolutely bullocks, my original apple charger that came with my mbp blew up in smoke while my Amazon lookalike still working just fine.
Risky?a lot of people don’t realize the quality of Apple chargers far exceed many third party chargers http://www.righto.com/2012/05/apple-iphone-charger-teardown-quality.html
considering usb-c type chargers are a much more risky investment, $19 isn’t all that bad for a 20w
I replaced a couple of my (UK) chargers when Apple started making neat 3-pin foldable plugs for the UK market. They are a great improvement and are no longer an inconvenience when tossed into luggage. Excellent design.
View attachment 1706823
This is what I would buy in your case:I agree, wouldn't it be good especially for travel to have one charger? I could plug my MBP, Ipad, iPhone and watch from the one charger. With the current PD system, it is mess t understand what charger can actually charge which product. I am not blaming Apple as they are just moving with the technology. But for the average person, we will have to mark the chargers to which products they can charge.
Looking forward to when these young tech people need glasses to read the ultra-fine print so we know all the outputs and if it is PD 2 or PD 3 or ....
Risky?
I don’t quite understand the love for Anker, I think they’re over-rated. Perhaps it’s good marketing?
Before anybody jumps on me, I don’t think Anker is bad just not as great as some people think. Their failure rate seems pretty high (just read the Amazon reviews). But I’ll give them credit that they appear to replace stuff without argument. Personally I’ve had a DOA Anker battery, a cable which didn’t meet the published specs so didn’t charge at the higher speed and a cable which was supposed to be 4 inches but was only 2.5 including the plugs.
Agreed. To each his own but I'll just spend the extra bucks and not worry about replacements and such.
what a picture of my fried charging brick?unless you have something more to back that up, that's not representative of everyone else's experience.
the overheating came first, then it threw smoke and a loud pop, scared half of my classmates at the time.If it just throws some smoke and then die, that's actually a very good failure mode. Overheating is more dangerous, I'm guessing.