iPhone app binaries 'contain' iPad versions and just adapt to whatever software identifier they are given. It shouldn't require any work to have iPhone on the outside, iPad in the middle from devs.I hope they can get the foldable to run iPad apps when unfolded. Was sad to read earlier that it was rumored not to be able to run iPad apps.
Gurman in the future “Just like I was wrong about the creaseless screen, I was wrong about the edge to edge screen. But, just because I’m wrong about everything doesn’t mean you should stop paying attention because one day I may be right!”I bet no edge to edge. They won’t even be able to get it all under the display although they will work hard to do so. They will have the smaller DI for a while as they hack away.
Add four years followed by “they decided not to”. He’s paid because he gets attention which means folks view their ads.If Gurman said it, add at least four years to his estimates. Why is he paid by anyone?
I had one curved edge phone a few years ago, I would never want one again. Its a negative thing with no advantages as you said.The edge to edge display is "cool" but adds no practical advantages. So it's more something fun to show off. I'm sure they'll still have more conventional pro models knowing that many don't want to pay extra just for "cool".
It doesn’t make sense, because it would mean running two versions (iPadOS and iOS) of the same app on a single device. How would those two versions manage their state when the user switches between inner and outer screen? How would the average user understand that these are really two separate instances of the app? For example, after logging into an account in the iOS version of the app on the outer screen, the iPadOS version on the inner screen would still be logged out, or logged into a different account. Data you entered in one version wouldn’t be automatically available on the other version. And which of the two would handle push notifications for the app? Would you get every notification twice? Would Settings have two entries for each such app, one for the iOS version and one for the iPadOS version? It would be super confusing for anyone but power users.I hope they can get the foldable to run iPad apps when unfolded. Was sad to read earlier that it was rumored not to be able to run iPad apps.
And if you use a case, it will cover the edges, anyway. I've always found iPhones to be too slick to trust myself not to accidentally lose my grip on one without a case.The edge to edge display is "cool" but adds no practical advantages. So it's more something fun to show off. I'm sure they'll still have more conventional pro models knowing that many don't want to pay extra just for "cool".
That's me. All that 'coolness' would be covered by my case. Anyone buying this phone would not use a case. It would be a showcase phone for them. A fashion statement of sorts. That's so not me.And if you use a case, it will cover the edges, anyway. I've always found iPhones to be too slick to trust myself not to accidentally lose my grip on one without a case.
Foldable, smooth wraparound display, no ports, etc. Many different ways to make a fashion statement, but, not what a lot of us require. Practically speaking, we need something that is functional inside a protective case. And the case will be protective enough so that the phone is not harmed when dropped 4 feet onto asphalt or concrete. I can say with total certainty that I will never buy a cell phone that can't be protected from a 4 foot drop.And if you use a case, it will cover the edges, anyway. I've always found iPhones to be too slick to trust myself not to accidentally lose my grip on one without a case.
Though to be fair, you can't accuse Apple of shifting the goal post when then haven't announced ANY of these things.Anyone else tired of hearing about “major improvements just around the corner?”
At this point Apple should just copyright the term “goalpost shifting.”
From what I read, the eu regulation only applied to the charging port and not to anything else. Such as wireless charging. It doesn't apply too.Can someone remind me, does the EU regulation prevent Apple from pursuing wireless charging only for the 20th anniversary device?
The edge to edge display is "cool" but adds no practical advantages. So it's more something fun to show off.
And there's a place for that, as long as they also make the models that are more practical and affordable. The "show off" devices do two things: they generate positive buzz and they try out new tech ideas that might make their way to practical devices in the future.That means it will meet Apple's #1 design specification:
"Must perform well in superficial demo scenarios where the words 'stunning' and 'beautiful' are used." 🤣
That first mock up image is horrible and impractical. Edges will get dinged. People will have cases... so what's the point of the edge being a screen?
This is already the case if you use without a case. My 15 pro is constantly registering touch just from holding, my palm or fingers slightly touching the edge of the screen. Id love to to go slightly larger bezels. The gimmick of small bezels becomes invisible after a moment of using the phone, but the usability impact of those small bezels is constant.I’m not sure that a true edge-to-edge screen is desirable. I can see issues with inadvertent commands from simply holding the phone the “wrong” way.