Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That 720P ( 1.2GB ) video doesn't look as good because it's compressed also. Normal 720P does 1280X720 @ 60FPS making an hour long show 10-15GB. So any "720P" video you downloaded that was only 1.2GB was compressed already.

Exactly. That's why some still want real video sources, and the cloud ain't gonna do it.

Actually, normal 720p is already compressed over 50x. Going further is just wrong.
 
I'm confused about the form factor. Do they expect it to be around the size & weight of an iPhone? Smaller is generally better in consumer electronics, but that's a strange size for a home device; bump the cable and you'd probably send the device flying..

If it's meant to be portable, then why? Are people going to carry a streaming device around with them?

To me, it seems like we're still missing a piece of the puzzle.

The days of big clunky devices are over (VCR, etc). look how small a DVD player has gotten over the years. This is something that could literally be velcro's or duct taped (yes I live in the south and that is what most poeple would do - not me, but most) out of the way to the TV.

But look at this way also. Add in wifi and 3g - then boom a small portable device to take to your next party and hook up to their big screen.
 
This news, if true, is welcome. Look at where the world is today -- many new LED/LCD TVs come with built-in media streaming capability, and even home theatre receivers are starting to come with that feature. Consoles like the PS3 and XBox 360 can do it. Other companies sell $99 (or near) devices that can do this, like the Western Digital WD TV Live, or the Asus O!Play, or boxes by other companies like Roku and Boxee. And yeah, this up and coming Google device.

When Apple TV was first released, it was pretty forward-looking. Now, Apple needs to do this just to keep up.

I'm looking forward to it, I think I'd definitely buy one, especially for $99.
 
Apps for your HDTV "There's a device for that"

If I were a betting man, I'd wager that we'd see an announcement about this in September at the iPod event.

Wouldn't Apple want to entice developers to the notion that their software is now available for 3 different platforms (iPhone, iPad and now :apple:TV) and that they can now see their Apps running on HDTV's everywhere!

This greatly expands the market which translates to bigger profits for developers. A point that Apple would surely want to highlight at the conference.
 
Apple playing software games again

no reason why this functionality can't go into an iPhone or iPod Touch. but they are going to make an extra device with limited functionality to try to get you to buy something else

Wait, what? You need a dedicated device to work as a cable box. Battery life? What if someone calls? Get where I'm going?
 
May be for you! But in the future, nothing will be stored in the house. It will be in the cloud. You can watch whatever you want whenever you want!


Which is all well & good, until your internet goes out, or you're stuck with a horrid internet provider that chokes your connection because some DNS server is down somewhere & they can't be bothered to fix it.
 
Bull$4!t

There is no way that this is going to happen.

1. While I can appreciate the drive to make a new apple TV a small device, imagine a stiff HDMI and power cable coming out of your iphone. Unless the phone was positioned at just the perfect angle, the lightweight device would not have enough heft to force the cables to bend, resulting in a hovering iphone. Unless the new devise has a mount (or duct tape as somebody mentioned earlier), this thing would not sit properly in a media cabinet.

2. I have literally spent thousands of hours ripping, encoding and meticulously tagging my movie collection, and given my luck, Jobs is going to let the apple tv die a slow painful death to ensure that all of my effort was in vain. I even got my wife to love the :apple:tv.

Anyway, I think everything I read about this updated apple tv sounds absolutely awesome, and if it happens, I will purchase 3 on the first day they are available, but I am not going to hold my breath.

One thing I do wonder, in the event of cloud based storage, which I would totally sign on for (even for a monthly fee), would I be able to upload things of mine, like home movies I have encoded. That would be a big plus for me.

That's my $0.02 :D!
 
Yeah $99 for yet another STB.

I guess people will just use their Sony BluRay player with Google TV support instead....
 
Bull$4!t

There is no way that this is going to happen.

1. While I can appreciate the drive to make a new apple TV a small device, imagine a stiff HDMI and power cable coming out of your iphone. Unless the phone was positioned at just the perfect angle, the lightweight device would not have enough heft to force the cables to bend, resulting in a hovering iphone. Unless the new devise has a mount (or duct tape as somebody mentioned earlier), this thing would not sit properly in a media cabinet.

2. I have literally spent thousands of hours ripping, encoding and meticulously tagging my movie collection, and given my luck, Jobs is going to let the apple tv die a slow painful death to ensure that all of my effort was in vain. I even got my wife to love the :apple:tv.

Anyway, I think everything I read about this updated apple tv sounds absolutely awesome, and if it happens, I will purchase 3 on the first day they are available, but I am not going to hold my breath.

One thing I do wonder, in the event of cloud based storage, which I would totally sign on for (even for a monthly fee), would I be able to upload things of mine, like home movies I have encoded. That would be a big plus for me.

That's my $0.02 :D!

Think MobileMe.;)
 
Funny thing is... That's illegal too. :mad:

Not necessarily. By statute it is technically illegal. However, that statute may not be constitutional, as Fair Use is based upon first amendment principles. Until there is a challenge to this prohibition and it is upheld, I say the Batemax case controls, and we should look to what is morally right or wrong. If you bought it and own it on DVD, you can make a copy for use with your AppleTV.
 
The TV box market is not very big, nor is it particularly profitable. However, the story would be very different for Apple because of iTunes. The money isn't in the hardware, it's in the content. Though that gives me some hope the story is true, it seems this is another analyst speculation which 9/10 times turn out to be wrong.

The tablet market wasn't big or profitable either.
 
I ripped all my dvds to my harddrive and am in the process of converting them to MP4 with an MKV package.

Why? Seriously...do you watch your movies over and over and over so much that it's more convenient to do all that, along with all that storage, than just popping in the DVD?

Also, don't buy the argument about it being a "backup" for DVD's. They cost what now...$9? $15?

I mean...do what you want and all....just seems like a lot of wasted effort just to watch a movie.
 
Something that may add a tiny smidge of credence to this report is that for the past few weeks I've been asking via various means to add the ability to 'browse' all the films in each genre like you can on the US iTS on the ATV. On the UK version there is no way to browse 'All' comedies, Dramas etc. You have to run a search (after memorising the entire library on your computer :rolleyes: ) to find something you may like.

Usually I get a reply after spotting bugs etc on the ATV. I even got iTunes Gift cards as a thankyou once. However I dont get the slightest response with this, even though they rectified it prior to the last update (thats when i got the gift cards).

Maybe they think its not worth it if theres a new version coming out. I still wish they would sort it out though as its the simplest bloody thing to do. You can do it on the US AppleTV so why not the UK?
 
May be for you! But in the future, nothing will be stored in the house. It will be in the cloud. You can watch whatever you want whenever you want!

...and pay someone else for the privilege. I'd be very happy with an apple tv that could play 1080p content and stream or you could connect a hd to it by usb or firewire.
 
Why? Seriously...do you watch your movies over and over and over so much that it's more convenient to do all that, along with all that storage, than just popping in the DVD?

Also, don't buy the argument about it being a "backup" for DVD's. They cost what now...$9? $15?

I mean...do what you want and all....just seems like a lot of wasted effort just to watch a movie.

This is exactly what I have done. I love movies and watch them over and over, plus I like to watch them before i fall asleep, or take them with me on my iPhone. This is the same argument for mp3s vs CDs. I think it is a matter of preference, but I do see exactly where DougB is coming from.
 
I don't want anything connected to my laptop. I use it on the couch, on my lap.

Then perhaps this device isn't for you. The whole point of these devices (and I am a proud and happy owner of an AppleTV) is that in the home you store content somewhere and then stream it to this device. The device isn't supposed to store except temporarily (which is how I use it). If your home isn't set up in this manner, this device may not be for you.

That said, if it does connect to a Time Capsule, you could download and store there and stream from there. But I'm sure someone has already suggested this.
 
A4 is just the first baby step

Great news about Apple TV. I knew there was a reason why I hadn't bought one yet.

But really, the A4 is only an interim step. The real major step will come when the PA Semi group's work finally makes it into Apple products. A4 was developed by Intrinsity (and also Samsung?) as a stopgap until PA Semi's custom system-on-chip is ready.

It takes 3 years to design, develop, and release an all-new chip, and it's been about 2.5 years since the PA Semi acquisition. This could mean that the 2011 iPhone will get the PA Semi chip, and possibly iPad 2.0 and iPod Touch as well. As for Apple TV? It may not need that much power, frankly.

And even a small iPhone-sized external Apple TV device is still an interim product. Eventually, I'd bet that Apple wants Sony, Samsung, LG, et al to build Apple TV into their TV sets.

Oh, and as for everyone who says "the cloud will go down, or your ISP will suck": that's why you might want to attach an external Time Capsule to the new mini Apple TV. So you can store at least some of your content at home.
 
If it's classified as A/V equipment it will have a USB port at minimum on it due to FCC regulations.

All A/V equipment require an "access port ".

Hopefully, it won't require a hack to access this one, or is that silly wishful thinking on my part?
 
Does the current ATV with the Apple software work with Netflix or HULU yet? Until that happens it's a non-starter IMHO.

The current iPhone OS could work as a good starting point though since the iPad can already stream Netflix, ABC.com, and access locally saved movies (easily expandable to network accessible). I can see where they might go with it.
 
Techies might be willing to cancel their cable and stream content from the cloud, but the vast majority of people see TV as a passive experience.

Read these recent article from The Economist.
http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15980859
http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15980817

While the technology is there to go find stuff and watch it, it turns out most people are lazy when it comes to TV, and just want to watch "what's on".

There is still a big place for broadcast TV. It's not going away any time soon. Whether it's broadcast over the airwaves, over cable, or over the internet, does not really make a difference as long as it's easy and passive. Content creators need to make money, which means paying for shows or watching advertisements.

People do not want to pay to watch TV every night. They do not want to make a conscious decision each night to pay $2 to watch a couple of shows before bed, or pay $1-2 if their kids want to watch something. So the model will undoubtedly be an unlimited monthly subscription model just like cable. With ads.

Also, what about sports? Do you all not watch live sports on TV in HD? I can't drop my satellite/cable subscription for this sole reason. Or else I would a la carte everything through itunes, netflix, etc.

And the satellite/cable companies won't give you the ESPN's and TNT's until you get premium packages, ultimately paying for channels you don't care about.

Apple TV will NOT replace cable/satellite, at least not for me, and a lot of others, i anticipate.
 
The tablet market wasn't big or profitable either.

I'm not saying Apple won't make money on the hardware, they always do. My point though is that the long term revenue stream Apple has developed through iTunes (music, movies, apps, books, etc.) far outweighs any revenue from a one-time $99 hardware purchase. This is where Apple differs from all other set-top box manufacturers and why seriously entering the market makes sense.

Change the software to the iPhone OS, let the iPad/iPhone hardware become sophisticated remote-like devices (as used in iPad version of Scrabble) and the concept becomes exciting.
 
Sounds awesome. Hopefully it can do live conversion or talk to a Mac for it, broadening the media types.
 
Excellent News!

I'm just glad they're doing *something* with the ATV... Great to hear they aren't just gonna let it die slowly. The ideas sound good; looking forward to hearing more about this over the summer... Fingers crossed :)
 
For me Apple TV's greatest drawbacks are the lack of storage and limited file format choice. Unless this new device offers external hard drive support and the full perian codec, I'll be sticking with my WDTV.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.