Good decision. Who needs the NFL when Apple already has the rights to real football starting next year?
I still watch the Broncos while living in Commanders land. Yeah, I know. #sighIs Sunday ticket a big seller. I can’t see paying for that even as a big NFL fan
A problem with the NFL at least this year is although there have been good games there are mostly crappy teams, evem though ESPN seems to think the Cowboys are the best team 🤣I still watch the Broncos while living in Commanders land. Yeah, I know. #sigh
Soccer (real football) really isn't that popular in the U.S.. Most people don't watch it and I know I wont! I don't even subscribe to Apple TV+.Good decision. Who needs the NFL when Apple already has the rights to real football starting next year?
A fellow Broncos fan?? Sorry to hear about that. It's been painful this year.I still watch the Broncos while living in Commanders land. Yeah, I know. #sigh
Theres 8 billion people in the world and only a fraction of it bastardizes the name while calling another sport barely played with feet 'football'. Yah, beaten to death argument, but that's not the point... the issue is larger than that. It's as infuriating as Americas reluctance to get with the rest of the world using the metric system.I have never heard that term, its probably a joke.
It was the savior for DTV. A incredible amount of DTV subscribers came to them only because of ST.
I agree with this. MLB, NBA, (NHL I assume) already do this. Blackout the local market and nationally televised games like MLB/NBA do to protect CBS/FOX/NBC/ESPN and your goodHow many more years do i have to use **** stream sites. Get with it nfl. Just launch a solo streaming app, that’s available on every platform.
And charge $300 less than how much insane nfl ticket costs now.
Get as far away from directv as possible.
They had planned to do that for several years. Running it under the auspices of NFL films. But they just recently sold NFL films. I suppose they could re-create something new. But they would suck at it and think that we should all pay a thousand dollars a season for the games. Unlike what they did in the rest of the world. They already have a steaming service and offer the games at a very reasonable price.Could be just the NFL.
https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-launches-exclusive-streaming-subscription-service-nfl
Drop the "Middle man" and do it themselves (well actually hiring an outsourcing contractor to do most of the work).
'Burying' the additional price they want to charge inside of a base service doesn't make much sense. ( in Prime cost or baseline Apple services cost ) .
It would be better all around if the costs were more direct. Now when CBS/NBC/ABC want to jack up local broadcast fees to in part for sky high sports content... they try to deflect blame on Comcast/Dish/DirecTV. ( Mean live TV service vendor is trying to 'take away' your NFL game ... call them and complain.). When it is largely really players and NFL have jacked up the prices of broadcasting the games much higher and just passing it along.
Why Apple (or Google or Amazon) would want to give NFL (or other sports league) shelter from their direct inflationary cost increases I have no clue. ? Chasing after sports stuff with these 'affordable' yearly subscription fees for recorded content is likely ruinous in the long term.
All of this super extensive content bundling is bad. Making people pay for high cost stuff they don't watch ... eventually catches up and causes problems.
When I say savior you have to remember that I was a subscriber for 27 years. I go way back to the beginning of DTV. They would have never gotten most of their subs without ST.Not really 'saving' DTV if after the first 'free' year the subscribers fall away. Giving away free stuff works up until it does not result in long term revenue to cover the costs of the initial 'freebie' bribe. Otherwise just paying tons of money for subscriber churn.
DTV subscriber long term numbers have been falling for a long time during this whole Sunday Ticket multibilllion dollar pay out.
Similar to the bubble of AppleTV deployments when some of these streaming companies were handing them away 'almost free' (or very heavy discounts) if just signed up for service for 3-4 months. That is OK if folks stay for 3-4 years. But if they bolt after the minimal period term to get the free stuff that is really wasted money when do the analysis over a multiple year basis.
2007-2014 there is no huge raise. ( about 16M to 20M )
![]()
DirecTV - U.S. subscribers 2014| Statista
This statistic contains data on the number of subscribers of DirecTV in the United States from 2007 to 2014.www.statista.com
2014-2022 substantive declines. ( around 20M at the beginning and mostly massive losses last several years )
![]()
DirecTV: no of video subscribers in the U.S. 2023| Statista
How many customers does DirecTV have? DirecTV had 11.3 million U.S. subscribers in 2023, down from over 13 million in the previous year.www.statista.com
'Back in the 90's it saved them' doesn't really mean much. This is a different century and folks have way, way , way faster Internet and non cable options now. The pricing was radically different and the new customer acquisition costs were also radically different.
So you aren’t going to pay because it will be on Amazon or Google instead of Apple? I find that hard to believe. People use NFLST to watch their favorite out of market team. These tend to be die hard fans and will pay no matter what service it is on.I guess I will continue to stream NFL illegally as I have for past decade or so.
My speculation... NFL wanted Apple to maintain the $300-$450 price point. Apple wouldn't do it.Apple backing out doesn't make sense, and the $6.99 deal doesn't sound profitable, considering the MLS cost of an additional $14.99/mo. Why would Apple do that? Who knows, maybe they are dropping these stories to drop a perception they want to acquire to strategically land a deal covertly by throwing off the competition.
I'm not buying that it's wise to form a conclusion off the limited knowledge provided in this article. Apple is streaming a significant number of MLS matches at no additional cost for Apple TV+ subscribers. It's reasonable to think they may have wanted to air X number of games each week at no cost to Apple TV+ subscribers too. Which, if you think about it, sounds a lot like what FOX and CBS do... which suddenly makes the NFL's concerns about what FOX and CBS will think seem a bit more reasonable.I'm not buying Apple wanted to include it in the 6.99 price. Thats just stupid. The MLS deal isn't included in the 6.99 price so why would they want the NFL to be included in that. Terrible rumors with no substance.
I’m pretty sure NBC and ESPN, respectively, have those games locked up For at least a decade.hopefully Apple can at least land the SNF or MNF game.
Now, why did you have to go mention Tannehill? Dude’s contract has handcuffed us for 3 years.You have 10 teams paying their QB over $35million a year. Tennessee is paying Ryan Tannehill $29million for gods sake. It's not just the owners who are getting rich.