The antennas would already be in the phone because 900MHz is used for cellular in Europe. The issue would be the European counterpart to unlicensed 900MHz, which for them is 868MHz, that has more limitations including a maximum airtime percent iirc.
This would've been great. I remember on our old Nextel phones we used to be able to Direct Connect even when we had no service, up to two or three miles if I recall. Only some phones supported it, so we always bought those ones. Forget what they branded that feature as.
Anyway, especially in America where cell coverage isn't available everywhere, I think this would be a great feature.
Apple has shelved a "walkie-talkie" feature...
I think iPhone has tuned for 850Mhz as well as it was used for 3G in a few places. The problem is there are no equivalent of unlicensed 900Mhz in China, Japan, South Korea, and basically most part of the world apart from EU and US.
Even the EU has nothing like the US' 900 Mhz. We have 446Mhz PMR but we get a meager 8 channels of 12.5kHz at 500mW. And get stuck with double the antenna length as needed for 900Mhz. There's also a digital variant (DPMR) that's similarly encumbered.
EU has had 863-870 MHz, for about 10 years now. I think it was ignored because of 446 MHz availability.
EU harmonized 915-921 MHz last year, pending countries dealing with incumbent users. A number of countries, like the UK, already have access.
863-870 is an ISM band for data only, not usable for voice and enforces a 1% duty cycle.
Interesting idea but I would wonder how useful it would've been anyways due to range limitations. Those rugged GMRS radios with their external antennas running on the 400Mhz band would probably be far more useful in the outdoors.
That's annoying. Lately it seems the innovation news coming out of Apple is the death of innovative projects. :/
It’s also reasonable to expect that the feature would be illegal in some (perhaps all) parts of the world (like Europe) where the use of such bands are heavily regulated and not for general use.
I would assume Apple is aware of any restrictions.It’s also reasonable to expect that the feature would be illegal in some (perhaps all) parts of the world (like Europe) where the use of such bands are heavily regulated and not for general use.
I’d think/hope that Apple wouldn’t shelf a project just because the project exec took off. i.e. I’d think/hope an Apple project like this could survive a leadership change. This doesn’t smell like the truth. Always be wary when a journalist writes uses the passive voice (e.g. “is said”) without saying who.The project is said to have been suspended in part because the Apple executive heading it, Rubén Caballero, left the company earlier this year.
It’s also reasonable to expect that the feature would be illegal in some (perhaps all) parts of the world (like Europe) where the use of such bands are heavily regulated and not for general use.
Don’t get out of your parents house much ****tard? Try it some tme there are actually places with no Starbucks or cellular service.I mean.. the Apple Watch version alone is weird AF. Why would anyone want this.
900Mhz has been set aside in many countries and is deliberately unregulated - similar the frequencies used by WiFi and bluetooth.It’s also reasonable to expect that the feature would be illegal in some (perhaps all) parts of the world (like Europe) where the use of such bands are heavily regulated and not for general use.
Well this just means they did not do research on what was allowed and what not before pouring resources in such product...This one tho is more likely because of comms regulations and each country having different variations of them