Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It likely uses a different display technology, has thicker glass and a thicker frame to boost rigidity, and then there's the ports too, and probably a thousand other things I don't know about as well.

Take a look at the teardowns, there's more circuitry in the thunderbolt display than the iPad Air which is interesting.

http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Apple+Thunderbolt+Display+Teardown/6525
http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPad+Air+Teardown/18907


With so much available space, they could have added a gpu. That would be a great addition to Mac mini and MacBook owners.
 
I think a lot of things are pointing toward Mac OS on an iPad-like device:

- Mavericks focusing almost exclusively on under-the-hood aspects for efficiency
- No UI change in Mavericks
- iOS 7 now 64-bit
- iPad/iPhone now 64-bit Arm processors
- rumors of 12 inch retina-esque display.....
....
....

Oh, I don’t disagree at all. I’m just saying that “throwing OSX on there” as it currently stands would be a terrible idea. Sure, launchpad is kinda touch oriented, but that’s like saying that Windows 8 is a great tablet os because of the interface formerly known as Metro. If that interface were used throughout the os, it would work great. But it’s not. This causes some difficulty, especially where the apps were designed for the desktop environment.

Now, give me a completely touch oriented UI in OSX on a 12 inch tablet and I will ditch my laptop in a heartbeat. That thing would be a thing I need.
 
Oh, I don’t disagree at all. I’m just saying that “throwing OSX on there” as it currently stands would be a terrible idea. Sure, launchpad is kinda touch oriented, but that’s like saying that Windows 8 is a great tablet os because of the interface formerly known as Metro. If that interface were used throughout the os, it would work great. But it’s not. This causes some difficulty, especially where the apps were designed for the desktop environment.

Now, give me a completely touch oriented UI in OSX on a 12 inch tablet and I will ditch my laptop in a heartbeat. That thing would be a thing I need.

I think there's going to be a significant UI update with the next iteration of OSX. I think Apple knows that too much iOS 7 in OSX would be a mistake, but I think we will see a bit more iOS-inspired elements in this year's OSX. Is it going to feature a touch oriented UI? Who knows?

All I know is that, regardless of what Apple does with OSX/iOS, this will be an amazing year for Apple fans:

- iOS 8
- new OSX
- Redesigned MacMini's?
- Redesigned Cinema Displays?
- iPhone 6
- iPad Air 2
- iPad Pro?
- iWatch?
- new iPods?
- new Apple TV?
- New iMacs and MacBooks

Can't wait......
 
Launchpad (I mean, c'mon...)
Mission Control
Full-screen operating modes baked into many OS X stock apps (e.g. iPhoto)
Multiple full-screen workspaces built into Mavericks that you swipe back and forth into

Steps in the right direction, but they’re not there yet. That’s not to say they won’t release something fantastic that addresses all finger related usability issues at WWDC. In fact, I bet they probably will, since a tablet that size needs a desktop quality os to be tempting. But they will not throw OSX on there as it is. Because that would be terrible.
 
That's all it needs to be good for. It's a product designed to appeal to a specific market that wants a larger screened, more capable iPad to use for more work intensive projects. Want to digital paint, work on a document, jot down music on a sheet, look at schematics, do a bit of coding? Pick the Pro. For everyone else, they've got the Air and the Mini to choose from.

I agree on that purpose as I described it, but the recent articles keep alluding to "enterprise" segment. Normally "enterprise" is another word for meat and potato activities in corporate which typically does not jot down music, look at schematics or code. I love my iPad, and use it for some business activities, but size is not the reason I'd never write a brief on it. Which gets back to my original point -- a "pro" model has to behave more like a computer, and have true pro features for it to be of any use to enterprise, or its just a bigger screen iPad.
 
You mean:

–iPhone 6, new iPods, new Mac Mini, Apple TV something: June 2014 (WWDC)
–iPad Mini 3, iPad Air 2, iPad Pro: September 2014
–Spec bump nMP: October 2014
–iWatch, spec bump iMac and Macbook Pros: November 2014, in order for it to hit the shelves by the shopping season

The "Apple TV something" has long been discussed, and I doubt Apple will introduce it this year. The rumors on it have been very scarce, and the only time it truly got spotlight was when it was referred to in Steve Jobs' biography. I also don't think the iPhone 6 will be announced in June. The WWDC is before all a software convention for developers. Secondly, iPhone is currently Apple's flagship product, I think they will continue holding a Media Event just for it to make the hype go UP.
 
There is nothing "pro" or "enterprise" about iOS. Software dumbed down so that grandmothers don't get confused isn't going to cut it for "pro" users.

Can I save an attachment to a folder instead of a sandbox or Reply All and add an attachment to an email yet?
So you think software can only be used in enterprises when it's super difficult to use? Lol.
 
It'll need something, because an iPad that does the exact same things as the Mini and Air...but bigger, isn't all that interesting. The most compelling thing about an iPad Pro would be the expanded capabilities that'll go along well with that extra couple inches of screen.

Kinda like how the 13" MBA isn't more interesting than an 11" MBA, or 15" rMBP isn't more interesting than a 13" rMBP, or a 27" iMac isn't more interesting than a 21" iMac? Point being, for the Mac line, you have many Macs, one OSX that scales through all the sizes. You pick the device based on the hardware capabilities and screen size that YOU need.

There's no stopping Apple from doing the same with the iPads - many iPads, one iOS. It might not be interesting but not out of the realm of possibility.

----------

I don't see the "Pro" designation, just for a bigger screen. It will be called iPad Air.

There are two iMacs, but one name. There are several MacBook Pros, but they all have the same name, there are two Mac Pro "models" (custom configurable), but one name.

Personally, I think the "Air" designation will go with the larger screen iPads, and the MacBook "Air"s will eventually be discontinued, as people are buying up tablets over notebooks or desktops.

Air = lightweight & signifies the direction apple is going...replacing the MacBook Air.

Plus, apple has made the MacBook Pro retina models lighter & thinner with the removal of the optical drive. As the iPads and iOS become more powerful, there will be no place for the "in-betweener" MacBook Air's, they are being squeezed out between the two.

Brilliant post. 100% Agree. Like yourself, I see the future of mobile computing consisting of iPads for mainstream users and Retina MBP for pro users. The MBA line will come to an end, eventually.
 
Maybe Apple should stop selling 11", 13" and 15" Macbooks and replace them with a single product, a MacBook with a 9.7" screen.

Because you know, according to some people here there is zero advantage to a screen bigger than 9.7" on a portable device.
 
They would have to completely change the UI and add many new features for this to be worth purchasing. Multitasking (true multitasking) and Touch ID would be nice additions.
 
I believe we will see a larger iPad. I think it's time for an accessible file system though.
We will never see a filing system on iOS. The majority of people only want to tap a photo in order to upload it/share it. They want a simple play list on songs. People genuinely don't care about exactly how things are stored in iOS, so long as they can easily get to it which they can.
 
With so much available space, they could have added a gpu. That would be a great addition to Mac mini and MacBook owners.

If there's one PCI-e device that Thunderbolt doesn't carry enough bandwidth for, it's a GPU.

Thunderbolt only carries 4 lanes of PCI-e. Most GPUs won't deliver any better performance than what you get from the Intel HD GPU without having a full 16 lanes of bandwidth.

Thunderbolt 2 does a bit better because you can multilink to deliver more bandwidth, but we're talking about an interconnect that only exists now, where the Thunderbolt Cinema Display was launched in early 2011. With the low bandwidth, adding a GPU would have added cost to the bill of materials, without adding performance worth talking about.
 
1. Start with the concept of the Lenovo ThinkPad Helix.
2. Ditch the guts of the hardware and replace it with MacBook Air parts.
3. Ditch anything related to Windows 8 and replace it with Mavericks.
4. Put in a software service that shows you iOS 7 when you undock from the keyboard and trackpad.
5. Make the device as manageable as Mac OS X (e.g. loading arbitrary LaunchDaemons that are not restricted to what's available through MDM), but retain the MDM profile functionality that already exists in Mac OS X. This one step checks practically all the boxes enterprise is actually looking for.
6. Give iOS apps the ability to pair a mouse, so you can do enterprise-y things like Citrix and RDP, which are a massive PITA on current iOS offerings.
7. Price it like a MacBook Air.

Done. You have a ready-made device that Enterprise would LOVE. Extra points if you implement enterprise hardware features like Intel's vPro management.
It would be easier for Apple to simply buy the MS Surface division and sanction the Hackintosh.
 
Really? Because I've never seen any announcements that Apple confirmed they were working on an iWatch, let alone a launch date.


That's because it has always been nothing but a rumor. Just like this silly iPad rumor.

----------

Yes, along with the iTV (I know, I know. It can't be called that)

Exactly...another rumor in a long line of rumors that will probably never happen.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.