Yep, so they can pocket those $100+ themselves!They're paying Samsung over $100 per iPhone X... you know they want to get off that bus asap.
Yep, so they can pocket those $100+ themselves!They're paying Samsung over $100 per iPhone X... you know they want to get off that bus asap.
Some reports suggest it is easier to make microLED in larger sizes (perhaps why the only microLED screen available is Sony's CLEDIS 36'x9' (yes feet, not inches)), so hopefully we will also see this technology in monitors soon.
Apple doesn't need the money so I would rather see them not sell excess display inventory to Samsung nor anyone.The thought of Apple selling displays to Samsung makes me giddy.
Why would Apple be selling displays to Samsung? Are you thinking mLED display panels? If so, still doesn't make sense.The thought of Apple selling displays to Samsung makes me giddy.
Do you really think a cost reduction for Apple would result in a cost reduction for the consumer?It will be nice if they can get the screen cost back down to around $75 per device. With Apple's profit margins the additional $75 - $100 the AMOLED screen costs is driving the price of the X up by $200 - $300.
I think you mean the holy grail would be an LED that turned into a black hole when turned off..The "blackness" of the off pixel depends on the reflectivity of the substrate and emitter. If micro-LED can use smaller or less reflective emitters and/or a less reflective substrate then it will produce darker black when off.
The "holy grail" would be a substrate of Vantablack.
Micro-LED displays have many of the same advantages as OLED displays have over LCDs, including improved color accuracy, improved contrast ratio, faster response times, and true blacks given both have self-lit pixels, but they can be even thinner, much brighter, and more energy efficient than OLED.
And, most importantly, you are no longer in Samsung's hands.
The Notch was especially designed to reduce the burn-in areaAll I care about is-does micro-LED suffer from burn in like OLED?
You can't have truer blacks than OLED ... considering black is off.True blacks huh ? Isn't that what say also said about OLED?
Most people aren't making noise about that claim because, to date, no one who has made that claim has provided any supporting evidence to back it up. Afaik, the difference between the panel on the X and Note 8 is not the panel itself but the color calibration from each company. Both panels are still Sammy's diamond subpixel design with that larger blue pixel.Do most people here not realize that Apple brought their OLED design to Samsung to be manufactured? Just like they brought their A-series chip designs to TSMC and Samsung to be produced. You don't hear anyone lauding Samsung for the A-series chips. Sure, it must be said that they've made excellent displays on their own and their manufacturing ability is fantastic and a critical part of making it happen. But the display was designed by Apple.
Does anyone really care about what Apple might be doing in 2019 based on sketchy rumors?
Micro-LED displays have many of the same advantages as OLED displays have over LCDs, including improved color accuracy, improved contrast ratio, faster response times, and true blacks given both have self-lit pixels, but they can be even thinner, much brighter, and more energy efficient than OLED.
And, most importantly, you are no longer in Samsung's hands.
This isn't apple of old, unlike SJ, when has TC dropped the price on a product line? iPhone X is unfortunately at a new price point, & as for the new displays lasting longer, one can only assume that the prices will ever become more prohibitive hence the need for them!It will be nice if they can get the screen cost back down to around $75 per device. With Apple's profit margins the additional $75 - $100 the AMOLED screen costs is driving the price of the X up by $200 - $300.