When Tim and Luca mentioned the difference in weeks per quarter, the AAPL after-market price jumped.
they sold 1M less iphones than same quarter last year.
Because the PC OEM market has been generally contracting. So even the same number of Mac sales is an increase in terms of marketshare percentage.
What do these Mac numbers show us? A stagnation, greed, or both?
Q1 12 - 5.20M Macs, $6.60B Revenue
Q1 13 - 4.06M Macs, $5.52B Revenue
Q1 14 - 4.84M Macs, $6.34B Revenue
Q1 15 - 5.52M Macs, $6.94B Revenue
Q1 16 - 5.31M Macs, $6.75B Revenue
Q1 17 - 5.37M Macs, $7.24B Revenue
Q1 18 - 5.11M Macs, $6.90B Revenue
They clearly would have beat with that extra week.. that’s why the ONLY real comparison is in a 13 week quarter as mentioned in the earnings call.shorter period. Higher number of iPhones sold per week
Clearly Mac buyers are a stagnant bunch. Possibly they are greedy too, but I don’t know how you get that from those numbers.What do these Mac numbers show us? A stagnation, greed, or both?
Q1 12 - 5.20M Macs, $6.60B Revenue
Q1 13 - 4.06M Macs, $5.52B Revenue
Q1 14 - 4.84M Macs, $6.34B Revenue
Q1 15 - 5.52M Macs, $6.94B Revenue
Q1 16 - 5.31M Macs, $6.75B Revenue
Q1 17 - 5.37M Macs, $7.24B Revenue
Q1 18 - 5.11M Macs, $6.90B Revenue
What do these Mac numbers show us? A stagnation, greed, or both?
Q1 12 - 5.20M Macs, $6.60B Revenue
Q1 13 - 4.06M Macs, $5.52B Revenue
Q1 14 - 4.84M Macs, $6.34B Revenue
Q1 15 - 5.52M Macs, $6.94B Revenue
Q1 16 - 5.31M Macs, $6.75B Revenue
Q1 17 - 5.37M Macs, $7.24B Revenue
Q1 18 - 5.11M Macs, $6.90B Revenue
You reply to a person talking about numbers, and now you are going to market share without providing evidence of anything. It still doesnt show growth.
Did you read my post? The countless number of people who said the iPhone X would be a flop, for the reasons I stated. Are you going to claim you’ve never heard any of the excuses I gave?
And? The iPhone 8 was available for longer. It still doesn't tell you sales numbers from each.Tim Cook said the X was the best selling iPhone every week since it started shipping.
That quarter had one extra week. iPhones/week was higher this year.they sold 1M less iphones than same quarter last year.
how is that spectacular in a good way?
No but it does suggest that the higher ASP is due to X sales not price increases outside of USA.And? The iPhone 8 was available for longer. It still doesn't tell you sales numbers from each.
Does anybody have some industry references to add here? I'm sure most (if not all) competitors barely even hit the $400 ASP.
But Apple doesn't have Arthur Anderson as their accountants.![]()
they sold 1M less iphones than same quarter last year.
how is that spectacular in a good way?
If, for instance for every $1000 iPhone X sold , and someone else bought the lowest model 6s, the average would be $725... Keep in mind that the 8 started at $699 this year and the 8+ at $799