Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not sure about others but I use the mouse more often than the keyboard.

It would make more sense to come up with a way to allow text input from the mouse.
 
It's inevitable

I thought Apple might try a full-sized virtual keyboard, because it would allow instant international keyboard layout changes and could serve as a secondary touchscreen. But that would force users to look at the keyboard far more often. And physical keys, even extremely short-action keys, are what people are used to.

Still, detecting multi-touch gestures right on the keyboard would be a huge win. The next time you're at your desktop Mac for more than a few minutes, just keep a mental total of the number of times you need to swing your hand back and forth between keyboard and mouse. And how far that movement is.

If you're right-handed and you have a full-sized keyboard with numeric keypad, that distance is about 1 foot. And it takes at least a second to move and get set each time. Over a year, that could add up to miles of travel and hours of travel time.

Oh, and I seem to remember another Apple patent covering multi-touch gestures *above* a surface. Combine this keyboard / multitouch patent with that patent and you can see how a Mac could instantly detect typing vs. gesturing. If any one of your fingers is touching the keyboard, the system could assume you're typing. If none of your fingers is touching the keyboard and you're moving one or more fingers within 2 inches of the keyboard, the system could assume you're gesturing. Fingers that aren't moving could be ignored. Just a thought.
 
Will you all READ? You don't drag your fingers over the keyboard. You perform gestures ABOVE the keyboard and the camera picks them up. Horrible idea, but it is still what is being proposed in the article.

I understand that, but noone is going to want to hover their fingers just above the key surface. They will undoubtedly lightly rest their fingers on the surface just as you would with a trackpad. Try sliding your fingers over your keys while lightly touching them. It's not the experience I would want. I guess it would depend on how high you could hover your fingers but I would rather have them resting on a surface.
 
The mouse is ahead of it's time. Still has many many many years left in the little device. The reason it's so hard to replace is because you can leverage a lot of screen movement with very little physical movement. Using a laptop touchpad will never have the precise control movement and speed of a mouse. Try playing quake3 with a touchpad. The secret is the mouse leverages the wrist and the touchpad uses your finger(s).

You can activate control instantly and release in a split second. Motion control systems you have to have an on mode and an off mode whereby every single motion will be tracked and most of the time you want to move freely and not have every action tracked. Even the Minority report freehand gestures are not as efficient as a mouse. The mouse is king.
 
Keyboards as mouse-replacements...eeesh, I'm not sold.

The most direct comparison I can make is to the PS3 Wireless Keypad, and that functionality suck-diddly-ucks Flanders.
 
fingerworks user here

Interesting here but it seems like the kind of thing that you actually have to see and use to really understand how it works. I'm having a hard time imagining moving the cursor by scrolling my finger around the keyboard which tracks my fingers with a camera without pressing the keys....
ok,
I used a fingerworks touchstream for a few years before it broke - and I can tell you that it is quite intuitive to switch from typing to mousing. In fact there is no 'mode' to switch from.
the 'gesture' to type is one finger making a vertical movement on a key.
the 'gesture' to mouse around (at least on the fingerworks) was two fingers down in close proximity.
Anytime the keyboard processor saw two fingers down - it interpreted it as a mouse event. If only one finger was down - it was a keypress.
quite natural actually - put you fore and index finger together and run it along the top of your keys - that would be a mouse pointer movement.

fingerworks sequestered mouse movements for the right hand, and cursor keys for the left hand (up arrow, down arrow, etc)

First off, it would get to be annoying to have to "toggle" between keyboard and mouse modes by pressing a key every time you wanted to do one or the other.

Second, I believe people are misreading the article. It is NOT the surface of the keyboard that is touch sensitive. It is the cameras that are placed slightly above it that sense motion. In fact, you don't touch anything while you make the motions- you just gesture above the keyboard. That would be odd.

Third, the physical keys of the keyboard are still present. It doesn't seem to incorporate the technology proposed in a previous article which would eliminate physical keys and use an entirely level touch-sensitive surface that would give physical feedback (most likely vibration) when each "key is pressed".
yea - you don't want to eliminate the keys - that was the shortcoming of the fingerworks - you can run your fingers across keys without pressing them - it allows yours fingers/wrist to 'rest' - thus improving RSI resistance. the ps3 keyboard is similar.
I understand the need for innovation, but what is so terrible about using a mouse? I've never found it that much of a burden to use.
Depends if you are a touch typist: moving your fingers from home row is bad all around. Think of fighter jets - they put the essentials controls on the throttle and stick (HOTAS-> hands on throttle and stick) and use gestures (buttons hi-hat, etc) to allow control of radar and other flight essential systems without having to lean forward and take your hands off the task at hand.
This also kinda reminds me of the fork and spoon...work perfectly fine.

Somebody invented the Spork...sounds like a good idea but it's extremely rare to use or even see. I think thick soups is all it's used for.
kind of insulting to a large portion of the world that uses chop sticks - just saying.

My main concern is how precise you could get with this system. If it takes 30 seconds to position the cursor where you want it, it's no good. Obviously we haven't seen how well it does at this, but I'm not instantly assuming that just because it's a new idea, that it's practical. I reserve the right to make an opinion one way or another if a demonstration model is ever shown.
Precision with any digital input device takes practice / training and technique - my trackpad is extremely precise by rolling my fingers (versus dragging my fingers) on the surface when I want to be very accurate. I find it more accurate than a mouse/pen/stylus.
It would clearly require an OS re-design. There's no way you could use this with the traditional cursor. It would be the kind of thing that would work with certain applications but you'd still have your mouse for older programs that don't support it.
nah, fingerworks already had it working fine years ago

I can't see this working well; having to hover your finger over the keyboard to move the cursor - sounds awkward and tiring.
fingers will rest on the keys - reduces fatigue in the arms/wrist.

I use the track pad and I like it. I wonder what the learning curve would be for this new type of keyboard?
It took me a few hours to get used to not grabbing for a mouse on the side of the keyboard - but other than that - it would be very easy. the trouble is using someone else's computer and having to grab that mouse again - it makes it quite evident how inefficient mousing is.

What would work is a full size virtual keyboard with track pad touch and typewriting capabilities.
Imagine a flat rectangular surface like a touch screen with a large version of the iphone or ipad virtual keyboard printed on it. It could work as both a keyboard and a large track pad.
proper typing means the eyes stay on the screen, not the keyboard - of course that assumes proper typing.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

I think that the only thing this does is allow for a device to be smaller, by eliminating a trackpad. it doesn't seem to have any ergonomic benefit since the surface of keys is up and down and fingers will only get caught on the edges unless you hover with them. Need a completely smooth surface for trackpadding..
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

tdream said:
The reason it's so hard to replace is because you can leverage a lot of screen movement with very little physical movement. Using a laptop touchpad will never have the precise control movement and speed of a mouse.

Trackpad beats mouse in terms of pointer manipulation, try it JUST for pointing in a game. Trackpad doesn't work for games because of the lack of requisite 2-3 buttons that would not also interfere with pointing.
 
So if I read that right, you hold down a button with one hand and hover your other hand over the keyboard, making the gestures?

Not sure how I feel about that. On one hand, it would be nice to not have to reach for a mouse. On the other hand, I'm not sure how well it would work.

That makes me wonder... I'm I the only one still doing Photoshop clipping with a mouse?
 
Trkbrd

Apple may have purchased this technology or stole it, either way it surfaced as one of the presenters Master's Project in last years Interaction10 conference in Savanah, Georgia. http://www.trkbrd.it/

"The TRKBRD design was born out of my final project for the 1st year of the Interaction Design Masters program at Malmö University, Sweden. What started as using a physical prototype to illustrate a new idea, has turned into a crusade to see the design brought to reality. Apple? Dell? HP? LG? I'm talking to you here... I want to see a TRKBRD in your next laptop or netbook!"
 
Just the other day I joked that one day we'll see physical keyboards replaced with a virtual keyboards on one big trackpad... I didn't know they are actually working on something the other way round. :eek:
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)



Trackpad beats mouse in terms of pointer manipulation, try it JUST for pointing in a game. Trackpad doesn't work for games because of the lack of requisite 2-3 buttons that would not also interfere with pointing.

I think a lot of people would disagree with you, myself included. I've no problem picking a pixel out on a 30 inch screen. Have you seen quake 3 players or any good counterstrike/fps players for that matter. They can pick out a pixel in a split second. Modern mice have a sensitivity switch for increased precision depending on the situation. Sniping mode vs normal.

To replace something it has to be better, much better. Not equal or different, it has to be better. Because everyone knows how to use a mouse, it's simple to use. That's why fingerworks didn't take off and neither will this. Touchscreen works well in a mobile environment, but at a desk nothing on the market is better than a keyboard and mouse. And a fingerworks clone isn't going to better that it either.
 
Last edited:
Not sure about others but I use the mouse more often than the keyboard.

It would make more sense to come up with a way to allow text input from the mouse.

Don't think there is 'one input device fits all' - the current combination of keyboard and extra mouse is a good compromise. But depending on what you do on the computer it might be more mouse centric or more keyboard centric. Good news is that Apple is researching in all directions (the keyboard from this article, the mouse with the lcd panel, ....). Someday they might come up with something that is better for some group of people - maybe not everyone, but for those it is designed for perfect. Just because something does or does not work for you, does not mean that it is the same for everyone else - and don't worry, apple won't forget your use case.
 
Not sure ....

I really like the idea, in theory ... but I think there might be problems with the idea of having one's hand hover over the tops of the keys to do the mouse gestures. People like the tactile feeling of actually pressing/touching something when they're performing actions on a device.

Just from pretending to have such a thing on the keyboard sitting at my desk right now? I find that something like a long, vertically-oriented button/bar just to the left of the Tab, Caps-Lock and left Shift keys might work well as something you hold down with the side of your left-hand pinky finger while using the right hand to do the mouse motions. But it feels odd trying to pretend to use a mouse scroll-wheel or something with my hand, while not physically touching anything.

Maybe they can come up with a new variation of the chicklet keyboard keys that feel ok as keys you press in groups at a time with your fingertips as you swipe around the keyboard layout?


Very interesting, I wonder why they haven't done a combination of Magic Trackpad and wireless keyboard in one unit yet? Other than potential cost it seems like a great idea.
 
I loved mine, in my old IBM thinkpad 10 years ago. I could whizz across the screen no problem then move to a precise point.

Why I think most people had problems with is is they treat it like a minature joystick. No. The trackpoint DOES NOT MOVE. It is rigid, immobile, but it detects the forces you put on it. So, press it harder to one side, and the cursor moves faster.

Don't get me wrong, it probably was way ahead of its time.

But - based on my usage a long time ago - I don't think you could whip across the screen and grab a small on-screen item as quickly as accurately as with a mouse or trackpad. Maybe I'm just not a nipple-expert. :eek:
 
I don't know whether or not this particular idea will ever make it to a real product, but I have to say that it's nice to be reminded yet again that Apple puts a great deal of thought into the human-computer interface.

Yep. As do other companies.

My current favorite touch-keyboard patent application is from Microsoft:

You know how people complain that virtual keyboards don't fit them, or that it's hard to touch type, especially if you have to lift a hand and then put it back down again?

Microsoft's idea was that wherever you lay your primary fingers on the screen, determines where and how big the keyboard halves are. So you just place each hand down with their four typing fingers, and the virtual keys appear underneath them. Instead of you having to make sure you are on the keys, the keys adapt to your finger placement and size.

--

After decades of using voice, touch, mice, pads, etc, one thing is clear:

There is no one perfect input device. A combination is good, but they should be aware of each other, just as humans combine multiple senses to communicate with each other.
 
The Perfect Apple Keyboard

Step 1: Take regular Apple extended-style keyboard.

Step 2: Replace numeric keypad area with Magic Trackpad surface.

Step 3: ????

Step 4: Profit!
 
I'm sure this will be an awesome product when the time is right. As with the majority of other Apple patents, I don't think this concept will materialize in the near future. Apple is a master at not jumping the gun and waiting for new technology to mature. This thing doesn't seem ready for primetime, but then again, you never know with apple.
 
E-Nuff already!!!!

I don't mind Apple spending money and wasting time researching better interfaces for say iPads, iPhones, and other "touch" devices. I think they have some some clever things thus far with their touch technology.

However, for computer input, there is nothing quicker and easier than the good old mouse and keyboard. Period. I bought the Magic Trackpad and tried to like it. I mean, I like the touchpad of my MBP, but use it only when I have to and if I do have space to drop my mousepad and mouse, I will always prefer a mouse. The mouse has pretty much reached the zenith in its evolution, but it still does the same basic thing, clicks and moves a pointer. No matter what they do to make that happen differently, it still comes down to pointing and clicking. And that is the way it should be.

Why do I want to be moving my hands/fingers to get my computer to do something that I can do with a flick of my wrist in a fraction of the time and be much more accurate. For browsing the web, I guess touch is ok, but for actually getting things done or working, you can't beat a mouse/keyboard.

I want to put my grubby hands "less" on my hardware, not more. It's bad enough having to keep glass iPhones and glass trackpads clean, without having to worry about all this other "touch" tech that Apple may want to implement into the Mac.

Mouse + Keyboard > Touch/Motion for Mac
 
Is the trackpad a mouse?

NO. Neither are the old trackball input devices. Just because something also co-exists doesn't mean it has replaced something as the de facto standard. *Many* more people use mice than trackpads.

Touch? I could see getting touch to be a good alternative. But motion? So you have to move your hands in fluid motions, no shaking, etc. Plus, I'm going to remember 100 different gestures just to get around my desktop? No thanks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.