Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,771
38,339


Following an investigation, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today announced it has fined Apple and Goldman Sachs nearly $90 million combined for "Apple Card failures" related to "customer service breakdowns" and "misrepresentations."

apple-card-1-iPhone-13.jpg

Apple and Goldman Sachs have partnered on the Apple Card since its launch in 2019, with Goldman Sachs handling the consumer lending aspects.

Specifically, the CFPB found that Apple and Goldman Sachs violated the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Act and the U.S. Truth in Lending Act by mishandling transaction disputes and misleading iPhone users about interest-free payment options available when purchasing Apple devices with the Apple Card. These failures impacted "hundreds of thousands of Apple Card users," according to the agency.

"The marketing of the Apple Card Monthly Installments plan led consumers to believe they would automatically receive interest-free financing when purchasing iPhones and other Apple devices with their Apple Card," the CPFB said, resulting in some consumers being "unknowingly charged interest because they were not automatically enrolled as expected."

Here are the CFPB's findings, including Apple failing to send some transaction disputes to Goldman Sachs, Goldman Sachs failing to properly investigate some of the disputes, and Apple and Goldman Sachs misleading cardholders:
Failing to process or share consumer disputes: Apple Card users were directed to dispute transactions through a "Report an Issue" feature in the Wallet app. For some disputes, Apple sent consumers a separate link in the Messages app asking for more information. Apple failed to send these disputes to Goldman Sachs if the second form was incomplete. Even after Goldman Sachs alerted Apple to this issue, the problem persisted. As a result, neither Apple nor Goldman Sachs investigated tens of thousands of such disputes and cardholders were unfairly held responsible for disputed transactions.

Failing to investigate cardholder disputes: For the disputes that Apple did send to Goldman Sachs, the bank failed to consistently send acknowledgment notices within 30 days, conduct reasonable investigations, or send resolution letters explaining the determinations of its investigations within 90 days. These failures led to Goldman Sachs illegally placing damaging information on consumers' credit reports and holding cardholders responsible for potentially fraudulent or unauthorized purchases.

Misleading cardholders about a payment plan for iPhones and other Apple products: The marketing of the Apple Card Monthly Installments plan led consumers to believe they would automatically receive interest-free financing when purchasing iPhones and other Apple devices with their Apple Card. The plan allowed cardholders to purchase Apple devices through a series of interest-free payments over a period of six months to two years. However, many cardholders were unknowingly charged interest because they were not automatically enrolled as expected. They also faced confusing checkout options about enrolling in the plan. For online purchases, Apple only presented the payment plan as an option to consumers using Apple's own Safari browser. Due to Apple and Goldman's actions, instead of making interest-free payments, thousands of cardholders purchased Apple devices on interest-bearing revolving balances and incurred interest charges.

Misleading cardholders about refunds: Cardholders with an Apple Card Monthly Installments plan essentially had two card balances – the plan balance and their interest-bearing revolving balance. For more than 10,000 cardholders, Goldman Sachs misled consumers about how it would apply certain refunds between the two balances. Contrary to Goldman's representations, portions of refunds for unrelated purchases were applied to the interest-free plan balance instead of the interest-bearing revolving balance. As a result, consumers incurred additional and unexpected interest expenses.
Apple has been ordered to pay a $25 million fine, which will go to the CFPB's victims relief fund, while Goldman Sachs is required to pay at least $19.8 million in redress to impacted consumers and a $45 million fine.

In a statement shared with MacRumors, Apple said it strongly disagree[s] with the CFPB's characterization of the company's conduct.

"Apple is committed to providing consumers with fair and transparent financial products," an Apple spokesperson said. "Apple Card is one of the most consumer-friendly credit cards available, and was specifically designed to support users' financial health. Upon learning about these inadvertent issues years ago, Apple worked closely with Goldman Sachs to quickly address them and help impacted customers. While we strongly disagree with the CFPB's characterization of Apple’s conduct, we have aligned with them on an agreement. We look forward to continuing to deliver a great experience for our Apple Card customers."

More details about the CFPB's findings are available on its website.

Article Link: Apple Responds After Being Fined Alongside Goldman Sachs for 'Apple Card Failures'
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: ghanwani
The Apple Card is the best credit card I've ever owned, and it's my favorite. I love that payments show up instantly, that I get instant cash on transactions, and that I have a pretty high-interest savings account, among other card features.

But that doesn't mean that it's perfect. I haven't had any issues, but obviously others have, hence the CFPB's involvement. Apple and Goldman should stop fighting, pay the fines, stop the illegal conduct, and move on.
 
The Apple Card is the best credit card I've ever owned, and it's my favorite. I love that payments show up instantly, that I get instant cash on transactions, and that I have a pretty high-interest savings account, among other card features.

But that doesn't mean that it's perfect. I haven't had any issues, but obviously others have, hence the CFPB's involvement. Apple and Goldman should stop fighting, pay the fines, stop the illegal conduct, and move on.
Apple Card has a great UI and I agree with your points, but its a HIGHLY average to below average card in terms of rewards. As such, I use other cards and rarely use Apple Card now.
 
Might want to fix that strike through @Joe Rossignol

ive not had issues of any kind with my card …
Same for me. I think the Wallet app for the card is the best I have ever seen and used. I also like that my payment gets credited right away and that I also get cash back right away.

I bet a lot of the complaints are from consumers who didn’t bother reading the terms of the card itself much less Apple toy financing and they got into financial trouble.
 
Interested to see who takes over the Apple Card. I wouldn’t apply for a new Apple Card if you’re on the fence.
 
I bought a lamp from Europe in January and paid the shipping company with my Apple Card. I can't stress enough what a huge mistake that was. I made sure to purchase insurance on the shipment and of course the lamp arrived shattered. The shipping company gave me the run around for 6 months and kept lying about the insurance company needing more info. Eventually they said the money was on its way but spent months saying "It should be coming soon." Eventually I did a chargeback in July. I sent them pages and pages of our emails, photos of the damage, and more.

Goldman Sachs sided with the shipper.

DO NOT USE YOUR APPLE CARD FOR ANYTHING IMPORTANT.

HELL, DO NOT GET ONE!

THEY DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT YOU
 
I had a dispute regarding a charge for a product I never recieved. Apple/GS wanted documentation on the purchase, delivery receipt, etc. When I said I never received the product, they charged my card and did nothing. Never would have had the issue with Amex.

I still use card and Apple pay for 90% of purchases.
 
I had a dispute regarding a charge for a product I never recieved. Apple/GS wanted documentation on the purchase, delivery receipt, etc. When I said I never received the product, they charged my card and did nothing. Never would have had the issue with Amex.

I still use card and Apple pay for 90% of purchases.

Just a few days after I got the Apple card in late 2019, I got a random charge on it for near $5k at a snowboard shop in Colorado. I had never used the physical card, nor used the virtual apple pay card. I had literality never used the card in any capacity whatsoever, or entered the numbers anywhere online. Goldman Sach's did fix it, after several weeks (read nearly two months) of back and forth. They sure didn't want to side with me from the get-go and to this day, I have no idea how it happened...

I have much better cards now, and get rewards in the 5% or higher range, especially with miles and such. The Apple Card is a simple card, but pretty basic. AmEx blue, for example, is doing 3% on all online shopping, fuel and groceries and 1% on everything else, with no annual fee.
 
Any 2.5% cash back card (no annual fee) is just as good or better than the Apple Card.

Any member card (with an annual fee) like Amazon or Costco credit card is better than the Apple Card assuming you use those member services.
 
This is true for any bank.

I had my AmEx gold skimmed at a gas station a few years ago and the resulting fraudulent charges were fixed and completely gone in less than a week.

My point, however, was the how did my Apple CC number get used half-way across the county when I had never physically used the card online, offline, otherwise, or even used it will Apple Pay?
 
Last edited:
Apple Card has a great UI and I agree with your points, but its a HIGHLY average to below average card in terms of rewards.
There's no shame in embracing the AppleCard due to the unique UI—that really is its primary selling point, and it's a good one. But it irks me when people naively celebrate the meager rewards. It's a very average rewards card, even for Apple purchases. Yes, the top-echelon rewards cards require some work on the part of the card holder to maximize those rewards, but if your goal is to turn everyday purchases into money or benefits, I don't really understand why you'd leave money on the table in exchange for a pretty interface.
 
Never had any issue with the Apple Card nor GS since day one and paid off the balance each month. I made a transaction dispute back in 2021 and been resolved within 60 days.
 
I had a dispute regarding a charge for a product I never recieved. Apple/GS wanted documentation on the purchase, delivery receipt, etc. When I said I never received the product, they charged my card and did nothing. Never would have had the issue with Amex.

I still use card and Apple pay for 90% of purchases.
I had a situation like that. I don't remember the amount but it wasn't a large amount -- less than $100. No documentation was requested and the chargeback happened instantly. Maybe the size of the purchase factored in? Credit score?
 
I'm all in favor of spanking misleading consumer credit activities. This article surprised me because Apple Card gets so much right - such as showing the impact of bigger payments on total interest paid.

Too many people simply don't understand what they sign - they only understand payments. Case in point, a friend just revealed to me that he didn't understand why his 4-year $40k car loan has a payoff balance of $38k after making monthly payments of over $1,000 for the past year. I asked what interest rate they got and he didn't know! People don't understand credit at all.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.