Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I haven't read all the comments. But I'm just assuming that with all of the different configurations possible, Apple had some stock ready, but also used the pre-order period to determine demand.

Relax, people. You'll get your order.
 
so, you can't line up on April 24 to buy one? really? If that's true, then almost NOBODY understands that. I just listened to a CNBC broadcast from 11 AM ET and one of the full-time analysts that covers AAPL with a $180 price target just said people can buy it on April 24....very badly communicated

...

I understand how the casual observer might not understand that given some lazy reporting

However, anyone who would actually want to get one early should understand it. It wasn't exactly a state secret. If not, then they probably couldn't figure out how to use the watch anyway ;).
 
there is no way stores will have stock before those online pre-orders have been delivered (and almost all models are showing June now online ). We're probably looking at July-September for in-store.

Not to sound like an old fart, but there was a time where "Apple doesn't comment/announce products that will not be available within 90 days" , per Steve Jobs...
 
Apple WATCH needs all the hype it can get to be a success.
All of this is, crafty hype making.

Similar to the cyclop new rMacbook.
 
I placed the order at 3:02 am eastern. I order the stainless steel space black and got a 4-6 weeks delivery time. Go figure, they went on sale at 3:01 am, sold out in a minute for launch day? something is fishy!!!
I ordered mine @ 3:02am EST. and received a confirmation @ 3:03am that I will receive 4/24-5/8... I initially tried the SSB and that was a no go once I saw the time frame (Same as yours) ,I had the other one saved in the SSSB in my cart and grabbed that one instead.
 
No. But I'd guess that many here knocking the Watch probably had parents who waited anxiously for Pet Rocks or Beanie Babies.

Make that Furbies.

Will never forget, how I got up 4 a.m. and drove from one state to another state to a small town to be at a store at 6 a.m. thinking that people in that town weren't as sophisticated to know about Furbies.

Arriving to lines twice around the block, I got back into my car laughing at myself for being so dumb to fall for that craze.

Only defense was that I was trying to please my daughters.

Ever since then I swore to ALWAYS outwait supply until I can just walk in and buy what I want.

On the funny side, the Furbies annoyed my daughters after a while, so they put them into a dark closet. Just found them again (The Furies that is) after umpteen years.
 
Better shopping experience

For the life of me, I can't figure out why Apple didn't sell the watch and the bands separate. Trying to decide what to have in stock with so many options is nearly impossible. Store supply, once they sell it in stores, is going to a nightmare.


For me, this actually stopped me from buying the watch online, because it was a bit confusing. why make it 20+ items/sku if you are only selling 6 watches and 10+ bands...

If they sell watch separately at $319 + $30 sports band, and it would draw more customers because of lower entry cost.

I walked into the store sunday afternoon without an appointment but was able to get fitted within 1 minute. Does this sound like high demand?
 
For me, this actually stopped me from buying the watch online, because it was a bit confusing. why make it 20+ items/sku if you are only selling 6 watches and 10+ bands...

If they sell watch separately at $319 + $30 sports band, and it would draw more customers because of lower entry cost.

I walked into the store sunday afternoon without an appointment but was able to get fitted within 1 minute. Does this sound like high demand?

I never understood the way they decided to sell the watch. I thought they should do the same as you suggest. Sell the device in different metals, either with no band, or a very basic band, and then sell all the other bands separately. You would have less skus, and be able to fulfill orders quicker. Not really sure why they decided to complicate things the way they did, it's an order fulfillment nightmare.
 
I never understood the way they decided to sell the watch. I thought they should do the same as you suggest. Sell the device in different metals, either with no band, or a very basic band, and then sell all the other bands separately. You would have less skus, and be able to fulfill orders quicker. Not really sure why they decided to complicate things the way they did, it's an order fulfillment nightmare.

And to add to this, the try-on appointments should have been at least one day BEFORE pre-orders. How many cancellations have occurred because people ordered the wrong size?
 
For me, this actually stopped me from buying the watch online, because it was a bit confusing. why make it 20+ items/sku if you are only selling 6 watches and 10+ bands...

If they sell watch separately at $319 + $30 sports band, and it would draw more customers because of lower entry cost.

I walked into the store sunday afternoon without an appointment but was able to get fitted within 1 minute. Does this sound like high demand?


There are not 6 watches, there are 12 watches. Your other points have problems as well, which you should be able to figure out yourself if you really think about them.
 
He was also mocked for sending a long email. People told him no one would read it it was too long, he was a whiner, etc. He remained classy even though he was being mocked.

We had a user here who originally broke the antennagate story and got the famous "don't hold it that way" reply fromSteve Jobs. He too was mocked and basically insulted.

I think you still do yourself and others a favour if you keep your emails short. Increases the likelihood it will be read by someone important and increases the chances that others have their emails read and responded to because the less time they have to spend on your email, the more time they have to consider other emails.
 
I think you still do yourself and others a favour if you keep your emails short. Increases the likelihood it will be read by someone important and increases the chances that others have their emails read and responded to because the less time they have to spend on your email, the more time they have to consider other emails.
Why would I care about other peoples emails being read as long as mine is read?
I own Apple products damn it!
 
Not to sound like an old fart, but there was a time where "Apple doesn't comment/announce products that will not be available within 90 days" , per Steve Jobs...
Like the original iPhone? Or the 2012 iMacs which were announced in October, started shipping in single-digit numbers on 30 November but weren't really available before January? Or the 2013 Mac Pro?

----------

That's the point.

A limited stock (very) to some stores.

What would be the point if every store didn't at least have somewhat of the same stock?

I believe the problem is too many SKUs and manufacturing problems.

The fact that all SKUs are backordered into June and later shows in my mind that manufacturing problems are main reason. We did have rumours not too long ago about manufacturing problems. And it cannot be high demand alone, the decision not allow walk-in purchases was made public before the pre-orders began.
 
Like the original iPhone? Or the 2012 iMacs which were announced in October, started shipping in single-digit numbers on 30 November but weren't really available before January? Or the 2013 Mac Pro?

----------



The fact that all SKUs are backordered into June and later shows in my mind that manufacturing problems are main reason. We did have rumours not too long ago about manufacturing problems. And it cannot be high demand alone, the decision not allow walk-in purchases was made public before the pre-orders began.

You are probably right about manufacturing problems or at least it is a good guess. I am curious why the watch bands are all on back order into May at the earliest? Manufacturing for many of those bands should be simple - right? At least in my mind.

Not arguing with you... just curious.

----------

Why would I care about other peoples emails being read as long as mine is read?
I own Apple products damn it!

Amen! It's almost shocking that people would give advice about what you should do or not do when you don't even ask for their opinion. These forums are becoming ridiculous with the hatred towards people and Apple. My response wasn't to say the person who responded to you was acting with hatred.
 
I'm hoping 50% LOL

Me too... I wouldn't mind getting my watch earlier, though it is Apple products and they are the best made so most will keep and sell for a profit and buy another one. The power of Apple and their quality.
 
I planned all along to wait and see what people's views were after having the watch and using it for several weeks before I entertained ordering one. Now it looks like I'll just wait for Apple WatchS or two or whatever the next version will be. At this rate if you order one now you'll get it right before they release the next one.

Poor product launch, IMO. And I'm an Apple Fanboy.

Things at Apple are definitely not as they were when Jobs was around.
 
I'm sorry but anyone following the Apple Watch release closely, like those of us on here have been, should have known with certainty that there would be no watches in store on the 24th.

Sure at one point I thought we could do in store pickup, but when that option wasn't available during my preorder I simply accepted home delivery.

It's sour grapes that there model is back ordered or that they did not order soon enough.


Yes, it's expected. This happens for every new Apple product launch, but that doesn't mean people should just get used to it. That being said, I think people are upset that the watch effectively sold out of launch day stock in 2-3 minutes. Telling people "oh too bad, get up earlier" is just rubbing salt in the wound.

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out on launch day, if scores of less informed customers line up outside of stores or not.

I know one thing, if all of these 4/24 - 5/8 pre-orders show up on May 8th we're in for one heck of a show.
 
I planned all along to wait and see what people's views were after having the watch and using it for several weeks before I entertained ordering one. Now it looks like I'll just wait for Apple WatchS or two or whatever the next version will be. At this rate if you order one now you'll get it right before they release the next one.

Poor product launch, IMO. And I'm an Apple Fanboy.

Things at Apple are definitely not as they were when Jobs was around.

You may be right, but lets look at the facts. Since Jobs has passed, sales are up, profits are up, Apple is now the largest company in the world (market cap), loved by wall street, Tim Cook was the man of the year (Time Mag).

For some reason, Apple is loved by everyone that matters to a publicly traded company. We may not like back orders and delays and it does stink, but demand has never been higher for Apple products and then you realize why there are delays. It stinks, but when you make the best of everything in tech (IMO) things like this happen. Apple can't keep up with demand and the more their are back orders, the more people say "I got to have it".
 
I placed the order at 3:02 am eastern. I order the stainless steel space black and got a 4-6 weeks delivery time. Go figure, they went on sale at 3:01 am, sold out in a minute for launch day? something is fishy!!!

Same, I ordered a Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Space Black (both with metal links) at 12:01 Pacific, confirmation at 12:02 with both watches 4-6 weeks out :eek:

I've got a pretty good feeling our ship dates will move up, I'll be honestly surprised if we have to wait until May 13 at least!
 
Like the original iPhone? Or the 2012 iMacs which were announced in October, started shipping in single-digit numbers on 30 November but weren't really available before January? Or the 2013 MacPro .

You're right about the original iPhone. But the 2012 iMacs and 2013 mac Pro were under Cook's era...
 
Totally missed my point.

But the movie is in the theater if you get there in plenty of time OR preorder your ticket and pick it up when you arrive on 1 May. The product is still there to consume. Can everyone see any showing they want? No, but some get to see it on the day promised that it became available.

In the case of the watch, it's not.

Since you can consume a movie in a theatre only at location, the comparison is not quite the same. The point is the watch sales are launched online only, the stores are just there as showrooms and delivery pick-up. They still start shipping on 24 April.
 
Same, I ordered a Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Space Black (both with metal links) at 12:01 Pacific, confirmation at 12:02 with both watches 4-6 weeks out :eek:

I've got a pretty good feeling our ship dates will move up, I'll be honestly surprised if we have to wait until May 13 at least!

Here's hoping. Fingers crossed.
 
You're right about the original iPhone. But the 2012 iMacs and 2013 mac Pro were under Cook's era...
After many iPhone launches it took six weeks or more until they were reliably available in the stores.

----------

You are probably right about manufacturing problems or at least it is a good guess. I am curious why the watch bands are all on back order into May at the earliest? Manufacturing for many of those bands should be simple - right? At least in my mind.

Not arguing with you... just curious.

Unless it is the part that slides into the watch body, if there were manufacturing problems with the bands, they would be unlikely to affect all different band types equally. Maybe the bands are manufactured by the same company at the same location and they moved resources from the band manufacture to the actual watch manufacture because not having extra watch bands available for sales is not as bad as not having any watches for sale in the first place.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.