Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,558
30,889


In October 2022, Apple updated its App Store Review Guidelines to clarify that sales of "boosted" posts in social media apps must use the App Store's in-app purchase system. Apple thereby receives up to a 30% cut of these sales.

Facebook-Feature.jpg

As a result of that clarification, Meta today announced that it will soon charge advertisers a 30% fee when they purchase boosted posts through the Facebook and Instagram apps for iOS. This policy will allow Meta to offset the amount that it will owe Apple for each sale — it is essentially passing on the added cost to its customers. Advertisers who purchase boosted posts through the iOS apps will also now be required to pay in advance, whereas Meta typically collects payment for boosted posts after they are shown.

Meta said this change will take effect in the U.S. later this month, and in additional countries later this year. Advertisers can avoid the 30% fee and prepayment by purchasing boosted posts on the web at Facebook.com and Instagram.com.

"We are required to either comply with Apple's guidelines, or remove boosted posts from our apps," said Meta, in a press release today. "We do not want to remove the ability to boost posts, as this would hurt small businesses by making the feature less discoverable and potentially deprive them of a valuable way to promote their business."

Meta previously said that "Apple continues to evolve its policies to grow their own business while undercutting others in the digital economy."

Millions of small businesses use boosted posts on Facebook and Instagram, according to Meta. A boosted post is a key advertising tool for businesses, allowing them to reach larger audiences on Facebook and Instagram in exchange for payment.

Apple Responds

In response to Meta's announcement, Apple said App Store apps have always been required to use its in-app purchase system for the sale of digital goods and services.

"We have always required that purchases of digital goods and services within apps must use In-App Purchase," said Apple, in a statement shared with MacRumors today. "Boosting, which allows an individual or organization to pay to increase the reach of a post or profile, is a digital service — so of course In-App Purchase is required. This has always been the case and there are many examples of apps that do it successfully."

If boosted posts have always been considered a digital service, it is unclear why Apple has allowed Meta to directly charge advertisers for many years, and it did not respond when we asked for an explanation. At a minimum, it appears that Apple has allowed Meta to circumvent the App Store's in-app purchase system for boosted posts since clarifying its App Store Review Guidelines in October 2022. That grace period is clearly ending now.

As part of its response, Apple said it has indeed given Meta ample opportunity to comply with the App Store Review Guidelines as they are currently written.

Apple added that businesses have the option to use the Meta Ads Manager app on iOS to set up and pay for their ad campaigns without using the App Store's in-app purchase system, as this app complies with the App Store Review Guidelines, which permit apps designed for the sole purpose of managing ad campaigns to offer direct payment options.

Update: In response to our inquiry, Apple said when it finds that an app is out of compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines, its general approach is to work with the developer to help bring them into compliance with the rules.

Article Link: Apple Responds to Meta's Plan to Charge 30% Fee on Boosted Posts Purchased Through App Store
 
Last edited:

turbineseaplane

macrumors G5
Mar 19, 2008
14,774
31,534
Apple: "We have always required that purchases of digital goods and services within apps must use In-App Purchase,"

Which is total BS and you should stop

As part of its response, Apple said it has indeed given Meta ample opportunity to comply with the App Store Review Guidelines as they are currently written.

Apple acts like the mob
 

CWallace

macrumors G5
Aug 17, 2007
12,027
10,732
Seattle, WA
I do wish Apple worked on a sliding scale where the percentage cut dropped the more expensive the purchase.

When the App Store was first opened, Steve and the Gang settled on 30% because they presumed there would be a "race to the bottom" on pricing where USD 0.99 would be the standard price and credit card processing fees were USD 0.30 at the time for said amount (so Apple effectively broke even).

But as the transaction price rises, the percentage of said fees drops and Apple should really pass much of those savings on (since they do deserve to make a profit).

As to Apple just dropping their cut entirely and eating the cost to maintain the App Store, that is never going to happen as Steve was convinced that the App Store was Apple's gift to humanity and they deserved a cut of everything that flows through it. And he engrained that into Apple management at every level.
 

thefredelement

macrumors 65816
Apr 10, 2012
1,193
646
New York
Which is total BS and you should stop



Apple acts like the mob
“You know you talk about these guys like it's an anthropology class, the truth is they bring certain modes of conflict resolution from all the way back in the old country. From the poverty of the Mezzogiorno. Where all higher authority was corrupt.” - Meadow Soprano

Apple used to be disruptive and innovative, now they sell out on semantics, they’re becoming a corrupt authority.
 

turbineseaplane

macrumors G5
Mar 19, 2008
14,774
31,534
When the App Store was first opened, Steve and the Gang settled on 30% because they presumed there would be a "race to the bottom" on pricing where USD 0.99 would be the standard price and credit card processing fees were USD 0.30 at the time for said amount (so Apple effectively broke even).

But as the transaction price rises, the percentage of said fees drops and Apple should really pass much of those savings on (since they do deserve to make a profit).

The problem is that Apple got drunk on the drink of an outrageously inappropriate 30% cut of everything

Only legal intervention will ever get them off this sauce
 

mrat93

macrumors 68020
Dec 30, 2006
2,257
2,960
"We have always required that purchases of digital goods and services within apps must use In-App Purchase," said Apple
Always!!!
If boosted posts have always been considered a digital service, it is unclear why Apple has allowed Meta to directly charge advertisers for many years, and it did not respond when we asked for an explanation.
Except here!

Apple added that businesses have the option to use the Meta Ads Manager app on iOS to set up and pay for their ad campaigns without using the App Store's in-app purchase system, as this app complies with the App Store Review Guidelines, which permit apps designed for the sole purpose of managing ad campaigns to offer direct payment options.
And here, because, uhhh, stipulations.

There’s no reason that Apple should charge the same percentage for digital content as they do for Meta to allow users to boost their posts. That’s hardly a “digital good and/or service”. Glad they’re increasing the price on iOS to compensate for Apple’s cut.
 

yabeweb

macrumors 6502a
Jun 25, 2021
695
1,560
If Apple are collecting a commission on this added 30% and Meta want to completely offset the fee, they need a 43% fee. But I ain’t no mathematician.
It’s not about getting back 100% it’s about showing people that they pay 30% more because Apple makes them, if they charged 43% most people nowadays with their education level would not understand and thing Mata want to profit from it.

they do not want to be seen as the bad guy here.
 

iLoveDeveloping

macrumors 6502a
Sep 24, 2009
593
2,265
Ireland
Which is total BS and you should stop



Apple acts like the mob
Hahaha.. Do you actually live in the real world? Imagine getting your product into a supermarket and saying you can’t charge extra on my product or additional fees. Apple owns the supermarket and I just find it hilarious that people think they can’t set their own rules. Least of all the EU! It’s getting out of hand now. You think for a second these apps demanding Apple need to change would be half as popular if they weren’t allowed on every iPhone that wants them?! Unbelievable arrogance on your part…
 

coffeemilktea

macrumors 6502a
Nov 25, 2022
849
3,435
It's truly tragic that Apple taking a 30% cut of in-app purchases on mobile will eat into Zuckerberg's incomprehensibly vast wealth and Meta's unstoppable money-printing machine. 😔
 

thefredelement

macrumors 65816
Apr 10, 2012
1,193
646
New York
Hahaha.. Do you actually live in the real world? Imagine getting your product into a supermarket and saying you can’t charge extra on my product or additional fees. Apple owns the supermarket and I just find it hilarious that people think they can’t set their own rules. Least of all the EU! It’s getting out of hand now. You think for a second these apps demanding Apple need to change would be half as popular if they weren’t allowed on every iPhone that wants them?! Unbelievable arrogance on your part…
Yeah… how did websites even work before iPhone came out…
Apple already charges for the developer program, has no problem ripping off any of the offerings already on their store and claims some kind of moral high ground in their content while really just using their market position to rip off anyone that wants to come and play.
AVP isn’t about anything other than mobile websites ticking back up in popularity after covid hit, younger people don’t want to install as many apps anymore because they’re aware of how invasive they are into their own privacy, these walled gardens may have once served a purpose but its not like they’re protecting anyone from psychological manipulation through algorithms, they just profit from it and figure out how to copy it when it fits their goals.

They were on your desk, then they were in your hand, then they were on your wrist, now they’re on your face.

Having different modes of content delivery is vital in a system like that.
 

dontwalkhand

macrumors 603
Jul 5, 2007
6,378
2,867
Phoenix, AZ
I am sorry Apple, I am a huge Apple fan, but maybe realize that 30% is way too much of a commission to ask? Imagine if you go to a grocery store and find out that their credit card company charges the store 30% to accept the card payment. It sounds ridiculous, because it is ridiculous. This fee should be 10% TOPS.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.