Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Correct. However another issue I’ve just found with Bitwarden is that you can add a new fingerprint to the device just using the passcode (and maybe a faceId profile but I don’t have that so can’t test) and then use that to log in. Some apps (banking for sure) prompt you for your login if the devices fingerprints have been added to/changed but Bitwarden doesn’t currently.
As many have commented, it’s not the fact that apple allows a simple passcode to unlock your device, but the fact that many other layers of security are undermined (Apple id, password keychain, Touch ID) so it doesn’t matter how secure those passwords are if all you need is a four digit code that can easily be snooped on/ guessed.
with FaceID, they key is to setup an Alternative Appearance. There’s only 1 additional slot. Fill it up with another scan of yourself. Then the only way a new FaceID can be added is to completely reset it, which will force every app to have to resubscribe and login again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
The big hole in this solution is that Apple foolishly lets you turn-off/change the screen time password by using the device password.

Here’s the flaw. Go to screen time. Then go to “change screen time passcode”. Then go to “turn off screen time passcode”. Then select “forget passcode”. You now have to enter your Apple ID. Which can be easily found by searching your email. Then select ‘forgot password’ for the Apple ID. After it asks for the device passcode, it will then let you enter a new Apple ID password from this screen.

Apple has some big time security flaws!
when setting up the screen time passcode, you can skip the AppleID recovery option which resolves this flaw. Of course, don’t forget your screen time passcode!
 
when setting up the screen time passcode, you can skip the AppleID recovery option which resolves this flaw. Of course, don’t forget your screen time passcode!
I just tried setting up screen time without providing my Apple ID. But after setting it up that way, I was still able to do the flaw I described.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brucemr
I just tried setting up screen time without providing my Apple ID. But after setting it up that way, I was still able to do the flaw I described.
The difference is if you skip the recovery in the initial setup, you will have to provide your AppleID password to recover, not just your passcode.
 
The difference is if you skip the recovery in the initial setup, you will have to provide your AppleID password to recove, not just your passcode.
Not if you select “forgot password” when it asks for Apple ID password. It will then accept the device passcode to reset your Apple ID password. Like I described earlier.
 
Here's an idea I came up with while reading the article: How about two passcodes? One just to unlock the phone and one to do the settings, Find My iPhone, Passwords, etc.?
This is the common sense solution.
im a little confused on this article?
Are we saying, since criminals are stealing phones, apple should be responsible?
that couldn't be correct right?
Not at all. It’s more to point out a flaw in which someone can reset a person’s entire Apple ID by just knowing said passcode. Of course people should use better than 4-digit passcodes in the first place but it is ludicrous that that can be done.
Actually, the issue is that with just iPhone passcode, which is far less secured than iCloud password, you can gain access to iPhone and able to reset iCloud password (without iPhone prompting asking for iCloud password again). This is a big deal and I would believe is a huge oversight from Apple. I'm forced to enter iCloud password to purchase free app on App Store, but not resetting iCloud password?
Yeah. I think this is the biggest point the WSJ story is making. This is flying over many of the drive-by commenters heads here. They read a headline and just commented without reading more.
 
Both of you seem to be missing the fact that I agree with your view points, and have mentioned the very same things you’re preaching to me in my own posts. Not only that but have posted my own solutions to the problems. I suppose you’re not reading them properly before posting your musings directly to me.
Yes and I have also commented on same. Good solutions bears repeating.
 
, it’s a sign of increased desperation in an increasingly impoverished world.
Actually it is a sign of rapidly increasing moral decay and the exploding sense of entitlement of those who would rather steal then earn.

Rich or poor there are crooks in both groups. Being poor is not a crime nor does it make someone a criminal.
 
OK, folks, here is a relatively simple routine that I use. Deliberate error and deletion of digits with only the last four (or six) being correct. This will throw any snooping bastard off 99% of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Four people out of 2 billion devices.
And they’re drunk people in bars.
I normally agree with Joanna Stern, but her progressive agenda - and complete lack of news stories - has gone too far.
This is social engineering. Not Apple’s fault.

Oh, and for those of us who have MDM/EMM, 60 day / 8+ digit passcodes, and containerized/encrypted business apps, we don’t worry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
This is the common sense solution.

Not at all. It’s more to point out a flaw in which someone can reset a person’s entire Apple ID by just knowing said passcode. Of course people should use better than 4-digit passcodes in the first place but it is ludicrous that that can be done.
I haven’t had a 4 digit passcode in years.
Nor have I been drunk or hooking up at a bar late at night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
This is social engineering. Not Apple’s fault.

Oh, and for those of us who have MDM/EMM, 60 day / 8+ digit passcodes, and containerized/encrypted business apps, we don’t worry.
It’s Apple’s fault when they allow your Apple ID to be reset simply by providing your device passcode. You don’t have to be drunk for someone to watch you enter your device passcode and then steal it. Sure 8+ digits will make it a little harder to snoop, but not impossible. It’s foolish that Apple allows an Apple ID to be reset by just the device passcode.
 
This is the common sense solution.

Not at all. It’s more to point out a flaw in which someone can reset a person’s entire Apple ID by just knowing said passcode. Of course people should use better than 4-digit passcodes in the first place but it is ludicrous that that can be done.

Yeah. I think this is the biggest point the WSJ story is making. This is flying over many of the drive-by commenters heads here. They read a headline and just commented without reading more.
The biggest point is if you don’t secure your iPhone properly, which was never said people can get into your phone by social engineering.

In addition why there isn’t a second password for iCloud is probably due to the password can be protected with a screen time content restriction option. And for the many others that don’t have to worry about such things it overall makes the phone more difficult to use.

What is flying over the heads of many is that it’s easy to blame apple for social engineering. The WSJ never mentioned screen time password and shame on them for not. I have compassion for the victim but others will learn for her mistakes.
 
I already described how both screen time and the Apple ID password still be reset by the device passcode.
Sadly true. They should re-vamp the whole AppleID security, as 2 factor is also useless once you have device access. It just appears on screen / gets sent via sms, to the iPhone.
 
Here's an idea I came up with while reading the article: How about two passcodes? One just to unlock the phone and one to do the settings, Find My iPhone, Passwords, etc.?
I’m already stuck using two Apple IDs (my iTunes ID for media and purchases predates my iCloud ID which does the heaving lifting for banking, medical, 2FA, etc.) so I’m brainstorming the outcome from removing my iCloud ID from my iPhone and Watch going forward (and promoting the iTunes ID to primary role on iPhone). [Edit: it was better for me to create a third ID for the iPhone and use the iTunes ID the same way as before, as the secondary ID for media and purchases.]

If I were away from trusted devices for that ID (iPad and Mac stay at home) and needed to log into my iCloud ID on my phone, would I be able to authenticate?

[Edit: yes, a verification code can be sent to a trusted number. See: If you don’t have a trusted device with you. ]
 
Last edited:
I already described how both screen time password and the Apple ID password can still be reset by the device passcode.
I don’t know what you did or not, but until you have an authoritative citation it can’t be done. Unless you have some specialized hardware you can’t take over an Apple ID without knowing the passcode or wiping the phone.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: sk1ski1
I don’t know what you did or not, but until you have an authoritative citation it can’t be done. Unless you have some specialized hardware you can’t take over an Apple ID without knowing the passcode or wiping the phone.
Wrong! Read my earlier post (#302) on how to do it. I tested it on my own phone. Big time Apple security flaw!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.