“Congrats you won! Here’s your $2 Apple Store credit…”I’m against Apple on this one. But I also know the only winners in a class action are the lawyers.
“Congrats you won! Here’s your $2 Apple Store credit…”I’m against Apple on this one. But I also know the only winners in a class action are the lawyers.
I’m against Apple on this one. But I also know the only winners in a class action are the lawyers.
Is Apple doing a remake of the 1985 movie Mask?Use any other photo than this, please.
You, okay. Fair enough.While Apple did seem to drop the ball with AI it’s not the end all of how you use your iPhone . I don’t use it and dont plan on it unless it blows my mind somehow.
Is that an imperial unit week or a metric week?Whoosh.
How many Tuesdays are there in a week?
Very true and I think for most people, this will be the honest reality."I'm gonna be a dad!"
But honestly, I can't believe that people are really THAT upset about this. I've never put so much stake in a company's software promises. Is it disappointing? Sure. Does it really affect me in any meaningful way? Nope. Siri has always sucked, so I never had high hopes for anything anyway![]()
Whew! I was sure I would see “What do you mean? African or European?” any second now 😆Is that an imperial unit week or a metric week?
Oh yeah... I'm guessing 1 or 2 new centi-millionaires and a few decamillionaires will be minted from the settlement.I’m against Apple on this one. But I also know the only winners in a class action are the lawyers.
I’m surprised anybody is defending Apple on this one
Yeah. I think Apple should have to give a refund to anyone who returns their iPhone 16 or $350 cash not store credit. Apple lied. Apple delayed. We still don’t have the advertised features and it may be more than a year more before we see them that’s it Apple can get on top of it now.I’m against Apple on this one. But I also know the only winners in a class action are the lawyers.
Completely untrue, AI was the main selling point. All the commercials were AI focused also. Totally wrong on this. Apple should lose big. I really think anyone who says they bought the 16 series for AI should be able to return their phone or get a $350 cash settlement. That’s my guess on the number of the value.The users suing Apple have no case. The iPhone 16 was not an Apple Intelligence focused device. Apple’s lawyers argued correctly that the iPhone 16 launched with many features that enhanced the user experience.
This case will be dismissed. Plain and simple
Yeah, the level of tech illiteracy of members of the judiciary, combined with the best legal team money can buy could swing it in Apple’s favor. I hope that does not happen in this case.I'm no legal expert, but it feels like there ought to be a case to answer, and not dismissed out of hand. That said, I would not take a bet that the action will succeed.
Yes, it was. It was completely sold for Apple Intelligence. All of the marketing materials on the sales site were geared toward AI. Which, unintentionally, turned into a "bait & switch" for a lot of users.The users suing Apple have no case. The iPhone 16 was not an Apple Intelligence focused device. Apple’s lawyers argued correctly that the iPhone 16 launched with many features that enhanced the user experience.
This case will be dismissed. Plain and simple
Better question is who upgraded or purchased an iPhone solely for AI. It’s a talking point for many average people but reality is it’s just a novel feature and some may find it beneficial while others don’t care or see it as an off-chance value added option.Certainly eyebrow raising
Lawyers have to eat also. 🖖🥸🤟I’m against Apple on this one. But I also know the only winners in a class action are the lawyers.