This is what is wrong with this site you just can’t beat a DEAD horse Tu o death enough
Yep, there were similar complaints about the ECG feature on the watch.
![]()
The Apple Watch heart monitor sends too many people to the doctor
False positives can be expensivewww.theverge.com
Maybe they'll be able to geolocate and say "That car crash is on a ski slope, so nope."I came off a rollercoaster a few years back to discover that my watch had triggered fall detection protocol.
My emergency contacts all got an emergency notification, my watch had called emergency services and I had a missed call from a local number (presumably police or similar).
It’s a great idea in theory, but if Apple can’t sort it and quick then as the responder says, the staff will become desensitised and the initiative will unfortunately crash and burn.
Good for you personally and your Apple watch. Unfortunately, for the two or three lives that were purportedly saved by an Apple watch, there are plenty more being put in jeopardy because emergency responders are unable to respond to a legitimate call because they're busy responding to bogus ones.It's not cringy or cringey. People hate on Apple for everything they do, but the Apple Watch has saved many lives. I'm sure the people that are here today because of their Apple Watch wouldn't think it's cringey. My Apple Watch alerted me to a medical condition where I needed emergency treatment. I can't say for sure it saved my life because I don't have an alternate person to test the other outcome but it sure helped me. I appreciate what Apple has done with the watch and I wear mine all the time!
From my understanding they tested it but nothing tests something like real life usage. It's kind of like when you create software and get it to the beta state then release it to people. Those people are going to find more bugs then your developers will ever find. Clearly though Apple should've done more testing because with something so serious it's not good to have false alarms. We don't want 911 operators thinking "oh it's just another false alarm from an Apple Watch".I think Apple needs more time to research (R&D and test this feature more properly. Instead of just using car crashes as an example they need to test them on other things such as roller coasters, snowboarding, skiing, and so on.
There needs to be way more data like that and are there any absolutlely proven times that someone dies because of false detection. And what about all the other falses. They should be addressed alsodo we have numbers on when the watch alerted emergency help that the user wouldn't have been able to do it themselves? or a bystander for that matter?
"the two or three lives that were purportedly saved by an Apple watch," are you really serious? If this is the most intelligent argument you can come up with against this feature...Good for you personally and your Apple watch. Unfortunately, for the two or three lives that were purportedly saved by an Apple watch, there are plenty more being put in jeopardy because emergency responders are unable to respond to a legitimate call because they're busy responding to bogus ones.
Your story isn't that far from the "Bitcoin made me rich" stories we hear from time to time.
How would working in person have helped? Someone could have brought up these "what if" scenario via chat just as easily as if they were in person.That’s why the engineers at Apple who designed this feature should not be allowed to work from home. They need to report to the Apple Campus and work on this feature in person and physically. ⭕️
I've had fall detection go off accidentally but the good thing with fall detection, at least in most scenarios is you're able to dismiss it. Also, it's only on by default if you're over a certain age. I think it's 60 or 65. I guess they figure if you're younger and fall, you'll probably survive.The unfortunate thing is that solving this problem will probably also lower the watch's ability to detect genuine crashes. Last Summer (or maybe it was the one before that), my watch tried to call 911 for a fall after I slapped a mosquito. I was able to stop it before it made the call. But sometimes two things just look alike to a watch.
While I agree with you on principle, when you're skiing it's probably a lot harder not only to respond to the Watch, but to even feel it. You're pretty bundled up when skiing, so it wouldn't shock me if you don't even feel the watch vibrating (and extremely unlikely you'd hear it). Even if you feeling it vibrating, but the time you unbundle yourself it may be too late to prevent the 911 call.I get the idea of the sensors being overly sensitive which I don't think they are. But only blaming Apple for this is stupid. If you've set off these notifications they're plenty loud and vibrate hard enough and give plenty of time to stop the call from going out. How is it Apple's fault that the wearer didn't cancel it? If you're wearing an Apple Watch and ignoring it completely why even wear one in the first place?
It's with people skiing so it's unlikely they would be able to do anything flying down the ski slope. I've never gone skiing, but I could imagine you don't want to take your hand up and mess with your watch. If someone here is a skier and I'm wrong, please let me knowI get the idea of the sensors being overly sensitive which I don't think they are. But only blaming Apple for this is stupid. If you've set off these notifications they're plenty loud and vibrate hard enough and give plenty of time to stop the call from going out. How is it Apple's fault that the wearer didn't cancel it? If you're wearing an Apple Watch and ignoring it completely why even wear one in the first place?
If it makes the call and then were to cancel it, it still goes into 9-1-1 as a hang-up call. The call taker would then be required to call the person back. If the person didn't answer on several attempts back, depending on the situation, if location information was available, a police/fire response might still be sent to the location anyways. This wouldn't necessarily help.There’s a simple fix Apple could implement easily. It could just wait 30 seconds and see if the person starts moving on gps again before making the call. Or make the call then cancel it if the person is in motion.
That kinda goes with my point then. Why even wear it if you can do nothing but ignore it?While I agree with you on principle, when you're skiing it's probably a lot harder not only to respond to the Watch, but to even feel it. You're pretty bundled up when skiing, so it wouldn't shock me if you don't even feel the watch vibrating (and extremely unlikely you'd hear it). Even if you feeling it vibrating, but the time you unbundle yourself it may be too late to prevent the 911 call.
Cue the reports from water-skiers and wake-boarders!
My 2¢. It's useful and important. But skiing/snowboarding means you are bundled up, gloves, and your phone is buried deep in the heap. Just getting to the phone (and not losing it in the snow) will take more than the twenty seconds default. I suggest several "pause" settings. 20 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours or something along those lines at your own risk. Pause at the top 20 minutes for a run, your're ok at the bottom?, get back to top of the lift, do pause again.
Emergency dispatchers continue to raise awareness about Apple's Crash Detection feature causing an influx of false 911 calls from skiers and snowboarders.
![]()
Crash Detection launched last year for all iPhone 14 models and the latest Apple Watch models, including the Series 8, Ultra, and second-generation SE. The feature is designed to detect a severe car crash and automatically call emergency services if a user does not respond to the device within 20 seconds, but it appears that iPhones and Apple Watches sometimes mistake a skier or snowboarder taking a tumble as a car crash.
A report from The New York Times today focused on Colorado's Summit County, where several ski resorts are located. There, a dispatcher and a police officer complained that responding to false 911 calls triggered by iPhones and Apple Watches has been a time-consuming task and threatens to divert resources away from legitimate emergencies.
The report quotes dispatcher Trina Dummer:Mark Watson, a sergeant with the local sheriff's office, also said the situation is impacting his ability to carry out his duties effectively.
In response to the report, an Apple spokesperson said the company is "aware that in some specific scenarios these features have triggered emergency services when a user didn't experience a severe car crash or hard fall." The spokesperson noted that Apple optimized Crash Detection with iOS 16.1.2 and watchOS 9.2 last year to reduce the number of false calls, and said the feature has "already contributed to saving several lives."
The report notes that Apple also sent four representatives to the Summit County call center to observe Dummer and her team for a day.
There have been several reports about the issue in other skiing areas like Colorado, Utah, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and British Columbia, Canada since Apple introduced the feature last year. It's unclear if the optimizations that Apple made have led to a reduction in false 911 calls from skiers and snowboarders; in any case, it will likely take some time before all users update their iPhone or Apple Watch to the latest software versions. It's also unclear if Apple plans to make any further optimizations.
When a severe car crash is detected, the iPhone or Apple Watch displays an alert, which users have 10 seconds to act on. If the user is unresponsive, the device begins another 10-second countdown while sounding an alarm and aggressively vibrating or tapping, and then calls emergency services if the user remains unresponsive. But since skiers often wear thick outerwear, some are unaware when the feature is triggered.
Apple says the feature relies on sensors like the accelerometer and gyroscope in the iPhone and Apple Watch, along with "advanced Apple-designed motion algorithms trained with over a million hours of real-world driving and crash record data" for increased accuracy.
Apple did not respond to our request for comment.
Article Link: Apple Responds to Yet Another Report About iPhone 14's Crash Detection Feature Triggering False 911 Calls
True, except if I am at a ski slope and really do fall and seriously injure myself then I want to be helpedOptions
1. Default to crash detection disabled
2. Watch uses gps to disable crash detection when wearer is at ski slope
3. Leave it as is and remind the users to disable manually when skiing
What you're describing applies to all technology. Obviously you're not all in on this because you're typing on some sort of electronic device to make a post here. I'm assuming you have electricity in your house and modern conveniences like air conditioning and heat. Maybe you have a refrigerator and a microwave oven? All of these are technological devices that have improved our life, but also made it more complicated. The cell phone is high up on that list because now you are connected 24/7Cam we stop naming this technology Artificial Inteligence as it’s obvious Artificial Stupidity at these prices in an cost of living crisis. AI was heavily marketed as something life changing, that we all need. Noup, is just making our life more complicated and emtying our pockets.
That's a really good idea! Make an obvious setting to pause crash detection, and maybe fall detection as well. With GPS it could remind the user they're at a ski area and to do this, but that also depends on the user paying attention to notificationsI suggest several "pause" settings. 20 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours or something along those lines at your own risk. Pause at the top 20 minutes for a run, your're ok at the bottom?, get back to top of the lift, do pause again.
Y'all think so? Summer is when people flock to amusement parks to ride rollercoasters.😉 It's just trading one set of false calls for another set.The good thing is ❄️ Winter is on its way to being over. So the crash detection feature won't be needed as much 😇