I'm not surprised. It seems like modern day corporate stupidity when it comes to training employees.
So, brand new campus and now only online educated tech repairs?
Oh, yeah, very smart...
Techs with NO hands on training...
Probably the latter. Notebooks can be shipped in bulk, and replacement parts can be sent to a single location rather than hundreds.Would it be "greener" to send one person out to train, or to send every computer out for repair?
But as First Officer, not Captain.Think that's bad? We professional pilots do the samething. Training is all done in the simulator. First flight in an actual airplane is usually a revenue flight with passengers.
Keep up the good work, Angela!
FFS...
In my Microsoft Trainer Training, I learned that there are 4 types of learners:Video training is the least effective method of delivery, if you want long-term skill retention.
Companies like it because it is cheap to make - problem is people rarely learn.
All I'm saying is if anyone online can instantly come up with "training without the hardware is a bad idea"....I'm going to have to assume Apple has thought of that as well.Well Macrumors are running the story without a named source but what do you want? it's a rumors site not the official Apple PR mouthpiece funnel. If people in the know dispute it I'm sure Macrumors will do an edit and amend the story.
Honestly, this does make sense seeing the direction they are going with their hardware.
What other company invests that kinda money into training for someone they are only paying $15 - 18 an hour?
Probably the latter. Notebooks can be shipped in bulk, and replacement parts can be sent to a single location rather than hundreds.
[doublepost=1489077726][/doublepost]
But as First Officer, not Captain.
With modern e-learning platforms, creating an interactive touch point module is simple. Medical and Nursing boards use this format on licensing exams for procedure knowledge (where to inject, which bone to manipulate, etc.). If it's good enough for healthcare professionals, the person changing an iPhone screen is golden.Video training is the least effective method of delivery, if you want long-term skill retention.
Companies like it because it is cheap to make - problem is people rarely learn.
9 months later: "The product you are attempting to repair has been categorized as Vintage, repair is no longer possible"Why not have the customer watch the web videos themselves and have us fix it ourselves. More money saved for shareholders.
This is indeed beyond being frugal. Top notch service has always been a cornerstone of the Apple experience, and it's sad to see this nickel-and-diming happening. I'd rather not have my motherboard replaced by a 'genius' who might have never had any hands-on experience with any particular actual hardware.Penny pinching every opportunity smh.
In my Microsoft Trainer Training, I learned that there are 4 types of learners:
- Kinesthetic (me) Learn best with hands on experience
- Visual - Learn best with watching someone else
- Audio - Learn best when listening to instructions
- Reading - Learn best when reading the instructions
How can it be wrong if the poster learned successfully that way? The fact he did it that way IS evidence it worked. What evidence have you provided to back-up your claim the method the poster used is wrong?This is my career field.
What you learned (as far as type of learner) is wrong.
There is no data to support that learning theory. Since the 1990's, and entire generation of education doctoral candidates have crashed and burned trying to prove it.
Again, there is no data to support it.
"This means that many customers who check their computers in for repair may have their device serviced by someone who has never physically worked on their model of computer before," said a person familiar with the matter.