Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That is highly debatable! It has been demonstrated again and again that hands on enhances training. This is why people taking science class have labs and why machinist spend time with machines in their training. Frankly would you let a plumber into your house if his only training was in the class room? Im fairly certain that the vast majority learn best with hands on education.


This is my career field.

What you learned (as far as type of learner) is wrong.

There is no data to support that learning theory. Since the 1990's, and entire generation of education doctoral candidates have crashed and burned trying to prove it.

Again, there is no data to support it.
 
I've never had a support experience at an Apple Retail store where I felt I had to write home about it.

With exception of the one time I had to bring my early2008 15" MBP in to get looked at, I've had to go in a second/third time and sometimes had to almost argue with them to get them to admit to there being anything wrong with the device I had at the time (iPhones and iPads.)

Sometimes, I've even ended up fixing the issue myself, after getting absolutely no help from Apple.

Conversely, the one time I've had to get hardware support for a work laptop (Lenovo Thinkpad W540), they (IBM employee) came out to my house the same day, replaced the logic board on the deck (was a nice day,) with me sitting there watching/chatting with them the whole time. Took about two and a half hours to troubleshoot, diagnose, swap boards, and test.

Gotta get the on-site support option for that, though, but it's not much more than the return-to-depot cost.
 
Honestly seems about right. The types of repairs the stores do now is limited due to how the products are now made. Plus there are quite a few more stores now than even 5 years ago. Seems like a needless expense (and not too environmentally positive) to send people cross country to learn out to do a repair. It's really unnecessary.

Judging from your comment history, my sense is that you agree with this as a cost-cutting measure and couldn't care less about its environmental impact.

Conservatives and business majors have developed a well earned reputation for short sighted thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dysamoria
This seems like a bad idea. The whole experience and camaraderie that comes with going through something like this really makes a difference to people. It also promotes a high degree of loyalty to a company by the employees. Now they just sit in a room by themselves? I think the quality of support is going to drop dramatically.

Why not just have the "Geniuses" browse through iFixIt?

At some point, it's just another piece of generic, disposable technostuff. Thumbs down on this idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dysamoria
In my Microsoft Trainer Training, I learned that there are 4 types of learners:
  • Kinesthetic (me) Learn best with hands on experience
  • Visual - Learn best with watching someone else
  • Audio - Learn best when listening to instructions
  • Reading - Learn best when reading the instructions
Most students have a strength and a secondary strength. For me, it's do it, then read the instructions. I know it sounds weird, but I like to figure it out, then read the instructions to see if there is a better way. Reading the instructions first is a nightmare for me, as the visual for the task as it is being done takes too much of my brain power. However, doing it first, then reading about it puts everything in context and makes it easy-peasy, with emphasis on the "peasy" part.

Having done an iPhone repair with a video, It was hard. I had to watch the video several times, pause it, and wonder what I do with that part that doesn't look right.

The MCT class emphasized always using at least two methods of delivery. Three was ideal.

Actually there are a lot of different types of learners. It's a theory in education called Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences. There's several others; Mathematical, Spatial, Color, and Intra/Extrapersonal. But for this, those 4 above - the Kinesthetic, Audial, Visual and Linguistic are the primary.
 
This could also be part of a "green" initiative. Fewer flights to Cupertino = lower carbon emissions. Also, most repairs are sent out these days for replacement (it's easier to process in bulk).

A more effective green initiative might be to stop the trend towards designing products to be non-repairable.
 
How can it be wrong if the poster learned successfully that way? The fact he did it that way IS evidence it worked. What evidence have you provided to back-up your claim the method the poster used is wrong?

1. Anecdotes are not data. The theory grew out of teaching via television to remote sites back in the '50's. The test instruments were flawed, and it became accepted wisdom.

2. There is not a single peer reviewed paper that backs the theory. Yes, I know the theory has been around since the '50's. 3 Generations of teachers have been taught it. The problem is that in the 90s's when they whole school reform nonsense started, people went back to see what learning theories are supported by data (Why aren't our children passing these tests - now we know why). This isn't one of them. None of us are happy about this, because it meant we had to start all over in both instruction and in test instrument development.

There is a LOT of resistance to dropping this, but again, the data doesn't support it. The problem is that using a learning methodology that the student is comfortable with means that the brain takes shortcuts and the learning isn't retained. Long-term memory retention is the key - and that wasn't evaluated in the studies mentioned above.

The best way for a student to learn is to use a methodology that the student is not actually comfortable with. The brain can't take shortcuts and the student is forced to pay attention.

3. I have attended way too many seminars where this argument breaks out. To quote 1 instructor:

You think your pissed about this? I wasted 3 years of my life trying to prove it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: dysamoria
WHAT?!?!?!

I can tell you what this really means. No more in store hardware repairs. Apple is creeping to a "swap it out" system. I bet the next generation of Macs released will not be repairable and will have to go back to be refurbished at the depot or wherever they send them now. We used to send them to Texas, not sure that facility is still there. They probably go to China now. There are going to be big changed at the bar.

Yes, Texas is still there.

With all the products and configurations I can't imagine they'd have all the parts in a store.

So, it will be just be: send to depot, swap out motherboard etc., instead of even looking at it.

Then they collect the bad parts sorted by issue and send it to China to analyze and repair.
Back to USA for refurbished or replenish motherboard stock.

All makes sense AND saves $$$.

BTW: Not that impressed with Genii. So far I always knew more than they do.

Same deal for my own repairs. You tube , ifixit and before that getting repair manuals from shady websites:)
 
Last edited:
Welcome to the genius program where you'll be repairing some of our newest products. Now sit back, watch this video and in a few hours you'll be a genius.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amegicfox
It's just makes the retail store a more retail store. This is bad in my opinion. But great for the shareholders.

Only in the short term.
[doublepost=1489081076][/doublepost]
Thank you Tim.. for taking out the spirit of Apple from Apple, bit by bit. Soon, you will be no different than Macy's or JCPenny.

it's telling that most of their retail staff these days are less knowledgeable about the product than their customers and typically don't even own Apple products themselves (in part because they can't afford them on an Apple retail salary.)
 
This is my career field.

What you learned (as far as type of learner) is wrong.

There is no data to support that learning theory. Since the 1990's, and entire generation of education doctoral candidates have crashed and burned trying to prove it.

Again, there is no data to support it.
Maybe it can't be proven, but I certainly identified with what he posted, going by trial and error to see how I learn the best.
 
You don't need to train a Genius if eventually they won't have Macs to repair...

I think the "Genius" position will eventually evolve to the equivalent of "Fashion Consultant" to help customers choose Apple products to match their outfit.
 
Yes, Texas is still there.

With all the products and configurations I can't imaging they'd have all the parts in a store.

So, it will be just be: send to depot, swap out motherboard etc., instead of even looking at it.

Then they collect the bad parts sorted by issue and send it to China to analyze and repair.
Back to USA for refurbished or replenish motherboard stock.

All makes sense AND saves $$$.

BTW: Not that impressed with Genii. So far I always knew more than they do.

Same deal for my own repairs. You tube , ifixit and before that getting repair manuals from shady websites:)
In the early days of retail they gave tests (pretty good tests) to new hires...even the sales people. Now they don't. The new motto is "anyone can learn". So that is why they are all clueless. When I got exiled to retail AppleCare they had just stopped testing and then the gap people showed up filling roles. Retail managers began overseeing the AppleCare/Genius side of the operation and it was all doom and gloom. They wanted culture over knowledge....and boy do they have it.
 
That's a shame, concerning the change. It really did sound like it was all of the following: useful, a morale booster, and instills employee loyalty. You'd think how Mac hardware is charged more for, it'd be enough to cover all of these services from the backend.

Also wanted to add.. I've worked on places where their policy was no photography allowed. OTOH, it's too cumbersome to search everyone entering those grounds for cameras, or even confiscate them. Given Apple's secretive nature, I'm surprised they allow photography on their campus grounds! Cool to know though!


Why not just have the "Geniuses" browse through iFixIt?
I wouldn't be surprised if that's what Apple's online training course entailed!
 
This doesn't really change the front-forward things that a genius at the bar does - the resets, the wipes, ect. It's not like they ever sat there and regularly installed RAM or anything like that. It just means that rather than have a technician in the back do it, they send it to a bulk depot where people who have additional training and permissions can do it faster and mail it back.
 
Perhaps Apple's machines have failed so much that there is now a considerable applicant pool of people trained in non-Apple stores who know how to repair Apple devices. Or maybe new Apple machines are meant to be disposable and can only be replaced rather than repaired.

[Sorry - my kid's very expensive MacBook just died - can you detect the sour grapes?]

One of the reasons I pay such high prices for Apple's products is their customer service. If Apple decide to penny-pinch on staff training, and customer service suffers as a result, it'd be another sign to me to be on the lookout for a viable alternative to Apple's ecosystem.

EDIT: Hands up if you would trust a surgeon or automobile mechanic who received only online training.
 
Last edited:
Why not have the customer watch the web videos themselves and have us fix it ourselves. More money saved for shareholders.

Because then they couldn't deny service to customers without AppleCare.
[doublepost=1489081756][/doublepost]
Think that's bad? We professional pilots do the samething. Training is all done in the simulator. First flight in an actual airplane is usually a revenue flight with passengers.

And the airline industry is so well known for the quality of its service and stellar customer satisfaction scores. /s
 
Weird move for a company that relies so heavily on employee engagement, while cost efficient and perhaps even environmentally conscious, this is deffinitely going to encourage the idea that retail employees are far from the HQ (as in not being part of the company) and of course its going to have an impact on customer service. People = Service = Profit. This is not an area in which Apple should be thinking about cost efficiency.
 
Last edited:
I don't know who would have approved of this move, I certainly hope it wasn't Angela Ahrendts who did. Could you imagine if the people working on repairing your Burberry bag had never touched a piece of leather before or had sewn anything before in their life?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.