Steve has already paid for it.Cook has to pay for the new campus some how
Steve has already paid for it.Cook has to pay for the new campus some how
And who. may I ask, repairs your precious Galaxy phone?Lol, one of the richest companies in the world cheapening and dumbing down their employees just like Circuit City/Good Guys/Best Buy...
This could also be part of a "green" initiative. Fewer flights to Cupertino = lower carbon emissions. Also, most repairs are sent out these days for replacement (it's easier to process in bulk).
1. Anecdotes are not data. The theory grew out of teaching via television to remote sites back in the '50's. The test instruments were flawed, and it became accepted wisdom.
2. There is not a single peer reviewed paper that backs the theory. Yes, I know the theory has been around since the '50's. 3 Generations of teachers have been taught it. The problem is that in the 90s's when they whole school reform nonsense started, people went back to see what learning theories are supported by data (Why aren't our children passing these tests - now we know why). This isn't one of them. None of us are happy about this, because it meant we had to start all over in both instruction and in test instrument development.
There is a LOT of resistance to dropping this, but again, the data doesn't support it. The problem is that using a learning methodology that the student is comfortable with means that the brain takes shortcuts and the learning isn't retained. Long-term memory retention is the key - and that wasn't evaluated in the studies mentioned above.
The best way for a student to learn is to use a methodology that the student is not actually comfortable with. The brain can't take shortcuts and the student is forced to pay attention.
3. I have attended way too many seminars where this argument breaks out. To quote 1 instructor:
You think your pissed about this? I wasted 3 years of my life trying to prove it.
You're absolutely right...There are a lot of different learning types, and with 7 kids, the humility I've experienced with "Just watch how I do it, and do it that way!" and a kid looking at me like I was Atilla the Hun, and not "getting it."Actually there are a lot of different types of learners. It's a theory in education called Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences. There's several others; Mathematical, Spatial, Color, and Intra/Extrapersonal. But for this, those 4 above - the Kinesthetic, Audial, Visual and Linguistic are the primary.
You wont be moving there when Apple finds out youre posting on rumor sites LOLThis was exactly my experience when I was at the retail level at Apple, Inc. It instilled the rich culture, tradition, and really allowed me to bond with peers. I am only hoping that they will move this to Apple Park, which would be amazing, as that is where my office is moving to!
I think you are missing a simple point. If something works for someone then mission accomplished, can I deconstruct it and present it to the scientific community as fact, who cares, it has already worked for someone1. Anecdotes are not data. The theory grew out of teaching via television to remote sites back in the '50's. The test instruments were flawed, and it became accepted wisdom.
2. There is not a single peer reviewed paper that backs the theory. Yes, I know the theory has been around since the '50's. 3 Generations of teachers have been taught it. The problem is that in the 90s's when they whole school reform nonsense started, people went back to see what learning theories are supported by data (Why aren't our children passing these tests - now we know why). This isn't one of them. None of us are happy about this, because it meant we had to start all over in both instruction and in test instrument development.
There is a LOT of resistance to dropping this, but again, the data doesn't support it. The problem is that using a learning methodology that the student is comfortable with means that the brain takes shortcuts and the learning isn't retained. Long-term memory retention is the key - and that wasn't evaluated in the studies mentioned above.
The best way for a student to learn is to use a methodology that the student is not actually comfortable with. The brain can't take shortcuts and the student is forced to pay attention.
3. I have attended way too many seminars where this argument breaks out. To quote 1 instructor:
You think your pissed about this? I wasted 3 years of my life trying to prove it.
This could also be part of a "green" initiative. Fewer flights to Cupertino = lower carbon emissions. Also, most repairs are sent out these days for replacement (it's easier to process in bulk).
This is my career field.
What you learned (as far as type of learner) is wrong.
There is no data to support that learning theory. Since the 1990's, and entire generation of education doctoral candidates have crashed and burned trying to prove it.
Again, there is no data to support it.
The idea is that the video training is sufficient for the items that can actually be fixed in the stores. As for other repairs, each store makes a consolidated shipment of every notebook that came in that day to the repair center.And how are those repairs ------ replacement making thier journey ? Hardly a green initiative when your constantly transporting goods. How much power is wasted recycling or refurbishing these units for minor issues that could be resolved instore.
The idea is that the video training is sufficient for the items that can actually be fixed in the stores. As for other repairs, each store makes a consolidated shipment of every notebook that came in that day to the repair center.
I was there roughly the same time frame as you. As a Genius (always hated that moniker) I left because the company was awful. They cared nothing about their employees. It got worse and worse every year. I remember having to cut time out of the week to discount allotted time for the dumb ass meetings they'd force us all to attend. Cheap asses couldn't even pay us overtime for the meetings. I hated that place. Still do. Though I have fond memories of going to Cupertino for training.There must be a huge turnover rate of them now. When I worked there from 2005-2010, they sent the Creatives and Genius crew to Cali for a month to do hands on training and then in store work. It was the best experience ever. When we got back, we brought back that corporate vide and culture to the store on the retail level. The entire store benefited from a few of us going out there. It brought the store morale up. It was like an award to go to corporate and train. Now that they will do it in the store level, this will not bring the same benefits that it once did. Loyalty will go down and those employees will be more likely to leave Apple sooner than in the past. I would have still been there as a Creative if I wasn't recruited to go elsewhere.
WHAT?!?!?!
I can tell you what this really means. No more in store hardware repairs. Apple is creeping to a "swap it out" system. I bet the next generation of Macs released will not be repairable and will have to go back to be refurbished at the depot or wherever they send them now. We used to send them to Texas, not sure that facility is still there. They probably go to China now. There are going to be big changes at the bar.
Judging from your comment history, my sense is that you agree with this as a cost-cutting measure and couldn't care less about its environmental impact.
The story says "Apple is allegedly providing "virtual take aparts" only now, with no physical hardware." that means they are watching the equivalent of YouTube videos, if that's the case what sets the Apple Geniuses' apart from anyone with a web-browser?
This could also be part of a "green" initiative. Fewer flights to Cupertino = lower carbon emissions. Also, most repairs are sent out these days for replacement (it's easier to process in bulk).
This could also be part of a "green" initiative. Fewer flights to Cupertino = lower carbon emissions. Also, most repairs are sent out these days for replacement (it's easier to process in bulk).