Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As long as they continue to sell the regular 4 inch version alongside. I hate using my dad's Galaxy SIII, it's like holding a brick to my face, but I know Apple will probably gain back a lot of sales.
 
Also, anyone who has used Windows and who says it's more stable than OS X can't be serious. Mac OS is UNIX > NT.

Wait just a moment there. Anyone who wants to say Mac OS X is Unix thus more stable than Windows is equally as naive. First, OS X has no roots in the actual Unix code that originated at Bell Labs, Apple do not own nor use any parts of the original SysV codebase which is held for license by Novell these days.

What OS X is an implementation that is compatible to the SUSv3, and thus is certified UNIX '03 by having successfully completed the OpenGroup's testsuite for such a certification. By passing a certification saying your systems calls are compatible and you have all the proper userland and kernel land components does not mean your system is in anyway stable or anything.

UNIX has nothing to do with OS X's stability. If you want to attribute it to anything, attribute it to the proper choices NeXT and Apple did which led to Darwin, the Operating System that powers the OS X distribution.
 
Wouldn't Apple stores have the latest OSX version installed?

Or Best Buy... or Fries'... or your college Campus' coop store... or simply borrowing your friends' Mac.

You could have also said "and what about Steam ?".

Still, just saying, posting a screenshot of you using a Mac is not proof you own a Mac. It's only proof you posted to MacRumors using a Mac.
 
Or Best Buy... or Fries'... or your college Campus' coop store... or simply borrowing your friends' Mac.

You could have also said "and what about Steam ?".

Still, just saying, posting a screenshot of you using a Mac is not proof you own a Mac. It's only proof you posted to MacRumors using a Mac.

KnightWRX - surely you can see that the poster you're replying to is here to rabble rouse.

LagunaFool is a little too close to LagunaSol. Opposite ends of the spectrum - and by design I have little doubt.
 
KnightWRX - surely you can see that the poster you're replying to is here to rabble rouse.

LagunaFool is a little too close to LagunaSol. Opposite ends of the spectrum - and by design I have little doubt.

The good thing is we know he'll be banned shortly
 
After having used ios for a few years before switching to a galaxy nexus and nexus 7, I can tell you which is better, although this is subjective and my opinion. There is a lot more you can do from a productivity standpoint on android, while on iOS there are many lacking features, but better apps. Also, the build quality on apple products is great, and so is the customer support and optics. I personally find the iPhone 5 screen a little small, but it isn't a huge issue. Also, unless you have the top of the line android phone, iPhones are better for gaming , with great GPU's. On android you can switch defaults, customize, add storage, change drivers, over clock, etc. and really make it yours. You can do some of this on a jail broken iPhone, but it is not the same. It is down to what you want. I might get an iPhone math.:p
 
Why not ...

Just make it so people go to an ordering site and enter a size within whatever range specified, then custom cut that thing. Custom iPhones. Dude, you're getting a Dell. What can we build for you today? Need need need need need. Damn, my 4S is a fricking dinosaur, what will the bros think of me?
 
The way I understand it, all apps freeze to ram without eating up any CPU cycles whenever they're not in the foreground, but some apps can access a service (for lack of a better word) that allows certain things to continue running even when they're minimized (once again, for lack of a better word). GPS tracking is one of them, as is music, and...er...some other stuff I can't remember off the top of my head.

I'll see if I can dig up that link I found that explains it all. It's pretty clever, if not a little limited in some ways.

edit: Here you go.

Or if you prefer a more complicated explanation...

They do enter the suspended state after a certain period of time, but from what I've heard, apps can wake themselves up while in the background and execute code. The GPS tracking app, for example, is not only checking the location but dropping a pin in its database at my location, thus executing app-specific code. There is also the VoIP category (like Skype), which appears to run in the background, according to those documents.

EDIT: Found this on a blog (since I don't remember where it says these things on Apple's site):

There are exactly five kinds of apps allowed to run indefinitely in the Background state in iOS 5:

Apps that play audio while in the Background state. A good example is Instacast while it's playing a podcast.
Apps that track your location in the Background. For example, you still want voice prompts from your TomTom navigation app, even if another app is Active.
Apps that listen for incoming VOIP calls. If you use Skype on iOS, you can receive incoming Skype calls while the app is in the Background.
Newsstand apps that are downloading new content.
Apps that receive continuous updates from an external accessory in the Background.
http://speirs.org/blog/2012/1/2/misconceptions-about-ios-multitasking.html
 
Last edited:
Have an upgrade in June (as should most people who purchased the 4S launch day), so I am very interested in this rumor.
 
I've had every iphone model since day 1 and if I have to be honest, it has become boring. They need some kind of wow factor in the next round.
 
Honestly, I don't understand where the troll accusations are coming from.

All I did was say functionality was more important than looks, that Android is twice as stable as iOS (AND posting a valid study), that macs are unstable POS, and that the guy who purchased a mac pro paid $6000+ for it.

Is it now trolling to speak fact?

Also, I have no idea what the hell you're talking about. Who the hell is LagunaSol?

Where did I say you were trolling? I don't use that word.
 
...unless you consider such a device the heart of a bigger device (like a Laptop or a small/medium desktop machine), which you can take with you when you leave. No more data sync and its related problems, as all relevant (i.e. personal and current project) data is on that single device - laptop and desktop housings becoming glorified interface boxes...

True, but the Motorola thing that attempted to do this flunked and I don't even think Asus padfone is selling very well, not sure if people would want an Android based computer. A windows phone would work and could run Windows 8 etc in a computer dock thing.
 
No, just no. No no no no no, NO. Buy an android device, please. Stop making it sound like bigger screens are a necessity. THEY are not. this is simply a matter of taste. If you want a bigger screen, buy a phone with a bigger screen. This does not mean apple has to do the same, and I hope to god they don't.

It's a matter of taste yes. But why should your taste over rule mine? I want a phone with a bigger screen but I want it with iOS. So what larger phone would you suggest I buy?
 
How else are you going to measure stability? I've used both Android (My Motorola RAZR MAXX) and my 60-year-old mom's iPhone 4. Neither OS crashes/shuts down randomly. Could it be that the iPhone was programmed so poorly that it causes incompatibility problems for apps?

Having written my fair share of iOS code, I can tell you a lot of problems have to do with the programmer. Most of my crash bugs have been over releasing objects (thus creating zombies), not checking if allocations actually worked before performing operations on an instance or simply leaking memory until you run out and the OS crashes your app. Xcode provides very good tools to debug such occurences.

Android is the same.

BTW if "Neither OS crashes/shuts down randomly", then why not just say both are modern OSes with solid foundations and design that provide much needed stability on these always connected devices we use ?

Why must one "win" and the other "lose" ? Both the Linux kernel (used by Android) and the XNU kernel (used by Darwin and thus OS X and iOS) are splendid from an engineering stand point and are solid pieces of software.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.