I wonder why they haven't updated Mac and iMac lineup with M1P/X soc's...
Supply chain constraints, I am sure. This is why we had to wait five months for the MBPs (they were almost certainly planned to come out at WWDC).
I wonder why they haven't updated Mac and iMac lineup with M1P/X soc's...
They could have announced them...Supply chain constraints, I am sure. This is why we had to wait five months for the MBPs (they were almost certainly planned to come out at WWDC).
They could have announced them...
If that's what he meant I agree. I'll use my 5K iMac monitor in 90% of the cases compared to my 34" UW connected next to it that's 1440p. It does make up for it by being 144Hz howeverI think he means that the resolution of the ultra-wide monitors looks weird at the physical size of the screen.
I tend to agree. If my 27" 5k monitor can display a resolution of 3360 x 1890, then a larger physical screen size needs to scale up the resolution from there, not nearly cut it in half.
Of course, that may not be what he meant. ?♂️
They’ll go in the big iMacs. The little one is a consumer-level machine.I wonder why they haven't updated Mac and iMac lineup with M1P/X soc's...
There should be both a 27 and a more expensive 32 with a 6K resolution.27 inch is way too small. 32 inch is the new 27.
There should be both a 27 and a more expensive 32 with a 6K resolution.
According to the rumours from yesterday the 27" iMac might be called iMac Pro. And even if not I can't imagine that it will come in the same colours a the iMac 24". I suppose silver and space gray only. Maybe even only space gray.A 32" iMac display would be for the Professionals and only come in Silver. The 27" iMac display would join the 24" iMac display and come in the same colors as this iMac would target the "affluent consumer level Mac Lovers" who love the colors but want a bigger display - and can afford it!
I wouldn’t get your hopes up for any HDMIA dedicated HDMI 2.1 input would please me ?
If I can afford a 27” I’m more interested in 32-64 GB of RAM and maybe an AMD GPU option than colorsA 32" iMac display would be for the Professionals and only come in Silver. The 27" iMac display would join the 24" iMac display and come in the same colors as this iMac would target the "affluent consumer level Mac Lovers" who love the colors but want a bigger display - and can afford it!
With luck the 32" would be designed to handle the M2 and M3 chips when Apple is ready for them.![]()
Don’t get your hopes upIf I can afford a 27” I’m more interested in 32-64 GB of RAM and maybe an AMD GPU option than colors
Why would Apple use an AMD GPU in a new iMac? That wouldn't make any sense at all, considering what they've done with the new Macbook Pros... and new 24" iMacs... and new Mac Mini. Guarantee they'll start at $2299 (minimum!) to differentiate from the 24" models, "Pro" moniker or not.If I can afford a 27” I’m more interested in 32-64 GB of RAM and maybe an AMD GPU option than colors
Because it’s a higher end model and the performance is better - but it’d change the form probably too muchWhy would Apple use an AMD GPU in a new iMac? That wouldn't make any sense at all, considering what they've done with the new Macbook Pros... and new 24" iMacs... and new Mac Mini. Guarantee they'll start at $2299 (minimum!) to differentiate from the 24" models, "Pro" moniker or not.
Maybe, maybe in the new Mac Pro since that's always been modular, but I could see Apple never using a 3rd-party GPU ever again unless it was in an MPX module enclosure, due to their move to AS. Hope I'm wrong, but the performance of Apple's new AS "GPUs" have been pretty stellar.Because it’s a higher end model and the performance is better - but it’d change the form probably too much
Better than the M1 Max? I’m not as familiar with AMD graphics cards but if apple stuck with Intel, they’d use the Radeon RX 6700 XT card right? I don’t think this is any better than the M1 Max (and certainly doesn’t come with video encode/decode and NPU benefits). Not to mention if apple does an M1 Max Duo option it would assuredly blow away anything AMD has to offer for the iMac form factor and power limits.Because it’s a higher end model and the performance is better - but it’d change the form probably too much
Apple is developing its own high-end graphic solutions. It probably makes more sense to invest resources in those rather than making Apple Silicon work with AMD.Because it’s a higher end model and the performance is better - but it’d change the form probably too much
I completely disagree. I bought a 32" monitor for a Mac mini and wish I had a 28-inch one instead. Everyone is different and has different needs and desires. I do understand too much real estate isn't the worst thing that can happen to a person.Sadly I agree, I ordered a cheap (450 dollar) 32 inch 4k monitor and I'm never going back to a smaller monitor.
It may be crap compared to the 16 Macbook pro I preordered but its so much bigger. I'll wait for cheaper options in bigger sizes.
Agree...After connecting my Mac mini to a 43" LG monitor, watching four 21" live websites simultaneously and AVOIDING COMMERCIALS has fulfilled one of my goals!...LOLI completely disagree. I bought a 32" monitor for a Mac mini and wish I had a 28-inch one instead. Everyone is different and has different needs and desires. I do understand too much real estate isn't the worst thing that can happen to a person.
Dang you must have a barn for your set up.Agree...After connecting my Mac mini to a 43" LG monitor, watching four 21" live websites simultaneously and AVOIDING COMMERCIALS has fulfilled one of my goals!...LOL
On the contrary, in my small room, it is more EFFICIENT to have one 43" monitor = four 21"websites rather than two 27" monitors!Dang you must have a barn for your set up.