What the hell is this crap?
Remember when Apple was a great computer company? It's getting harder and harder to remember Apple's former greatness as the Tim Cook regime marches on.
Does anyone actually listen to this nonsense...? I understand why, from a strategic perspective, Apple felt the need to enter the streaming business. But if they really wanted it to succeed they should have done so with a much bigger 'bang' and made it close to free for the first few years to bankrupt their competitors.
Two yearswere not talking about going to Mars, and lets face it the 2016 MBP is far from free of flaws, just exactly how much time does Apple need to get things right? As stated Apple needs to deliver bottom line...
Q-6
What's the relation in this article between a Mac Pro and Beats 1 in New York City?
What the hell is this crap?
Remember when Apple was a great computer company? It's getting harder and harder to remember Apple's former greatness as the Tim Cook regime marches on.
To support your argument; according to Apple, their Mac business would be a Fortune 100 company.The reason Apple is still a company is because it's no longer just a computer company. I don't understand why there's a segment of folks who think companies should do one thing and one thing only.
Hey does anyone remember when Nintendo was a great playing cards company?
News Headline = "Apple does something completely unrelated to Mac Pro, but is great for their business none the less"
I could see this becoming a "hit" particularly when Apple starts saying "visit your local Apple store to see xx broadcast live" in certain locations.
Not sure if that was aimed at me or not? If so, think you missed the point of my post hahaTo be frank I am really tired of login in this forum and reading all time bunch of Mac crybabies who think Apple should only make Macs, and most of the times in articles totally unrelated to Mac. Mac is not anymore the main focus of Apple, the sooner you realize it, the better it is for you and all of us who love other stuff also.
What's the relation in this article between a Mac Pro and Beats 1 in New York City?
Such companies do this from "scratch" Apple is simply buying time, in the hope to retain the professional audience, more importantly for Apple the follow though from the general consumer. Apple needs to stop talking and delver nothing more, nothing less; no more Pipelines, no more amazing products coming, DELIVER plain and simple.
I don't want to see another Keynote compromising of empty consumer based products, I want action, I want professional solutions, I want new product available the day of release. I am sick and tired of Tim Cook's Apple. Frankly too late, we have switched platforms, nor do we have any great issue, Apple's loss, competitors gain...
Q-6
Thank god we'll have a Beats 1 broadcasting booth at least a year before a new Mac Pro. Apple sure has their priorities straight.
Do you really believe Apple would be better off forgetting about their services business?So will the DJs be doing custom mixes with their Touch Bar? Ha. Ha. Truly, I liked Apple when it was cool because of its products not its gimmicks like a live in-house DJ. It just seems Apple is losing its way.
Or might it just be possible that they can do both?
Does anyone actually listen to this nonsense...? I understand why, from a strategic perspective, Apple felt the need to enter the streaming business. But if they really wanted it to succeed they should have done so with a much bigger 'bang' and made it close to free for the first few years to bankrupt their competitors.
But it's frustrating that apparently someone at Apple realized they needed a new radio studio before someone else at Apple realized they needed a new Mac Pro.