Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

Apple Says Government Trying to 'Rewrite History' by Using All Writs Act as 'All-Powerful Magic Wand'

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
50,386
11,757



Following the U.S. government's filing last week once again urging the court to compel Apple to assist the FBI in unlocking the iPhone of San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook, a document Apple general counsel Bruce Sewell called a "cheap shot," Apple today filed its response arguing that the government's reliance on the All Writs Act dating back to 1789 as justification for the request is an attempt to "rewrite history by portraying the Act as an all-powerful magic wand rather than the limited procedural tool it is."


Today's filing, shared by Business Insider, outlines Apple's arguments as to why the All Writs Act should not apply in this situation and reiterates a number of positions the company has previously described, including belief that this issue needs to be settled legislatively and that the imposition of the order would cause "unprecedented and offensive burdens" and violate both Apple's First Amendment rights and the Due Process Clause.
This case arises in a difficult context after a terrible tragedy. But it is in just such highly-charged and emotional cases that the courts must zealously guard civil liberties and the rule of law and reject government overreaching. This Court should therefore deny the government's request and vacate the order.
Apple goes on to outline its arguments as to why the All Writs Act is not applicable, noting that Congress had previously declined to expand the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) to include scenarios such as this and that the government's request usurps the legislative authority exercised by Congress.
CALEA's legislative history makes clear the sound policy reasons behind its specific limitations on when decryption services can be required. During congressional hearings on CALEA, then-FBI director Louis Freeh assured Senator Leahy that CALEA would not impede the growth of new technologies. When Senator Leahy asked whether CALEA would inhibit the growth of encryption, he responded "this legislation does not ask [companies] to decrypt. It just tells them to give us the bits as they have them. If they are [en]crypted, that is my problem."
In its conclusion, Apple argues that "the government's motivations are understandable, but its methods for achieving its objectives are contrary to the rule of law, the democratic process, and the rights of the American people."

A court hearing to address the issue is scheduled for next Tuesday, March 22, the day after Apple's media event where it is expected to introduce a new 4-inch "iPhone SE" and a new 9.7-inch iPad, as well as make a few additional announcements.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Apple Says Government Trying to 'Rewrite History' by Using All Writs Act as 'All-Powerful Magic Wand'
 

Zwhaler

macrumors 604
Jun 10, 2006
6,903
1,253
You know they're desperate when they resort to something written in 1789...

(I'm not downplaying important legislation on the whole from that period like the Constitution...)
 
Comment

SteveW928

macrumors 68000
May 28, 2010
1,761
1,311
Victoria, B.C. Canada
The FBI is drunk with power. And, the people in Congress are clueless, if they decide. If it goes to SCOTUS, who knows what will happen? It might be one of those moments where the impact of not having enough conservatives on the bench becomes really obvious.

Apple is easily in the right here, but I'm not going to be holding my breath on the actual outcome. We might be looking back on this as that crucial moment when bill of rights really fell apart (though it's been being eroded for a while now).
 
Comment

RogerWilco

macrumors 6502a
Jul 29, 2011
758
1,245
This will end up in the Supreme Court. Apple will lose because Ginsberg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Kennedy don't respect individual rights. A tie vote reverts the case back to the appellate court decision. And to think a lot of people cheered when Scalia died, he would have probably sided with Apple.
 
Comment

Sill

macrumors 6502a
Nov 14, 2014
733
492
FBI, DOJ have become synonymous with "Republicans" who always "think backwards, in reverse."


Don't fool yourself- there isn't a dime's worth of difference between the two parties. Both are controlled by neocons, both are an embarrassment to the people that helped found them and build them as well as staunch party members who vote according to the respective platforms, when those platforms are nothing more than window dressing anymore. Might as well call them demublicans and republicrats.
 
Comment

leroypants

Suspended
Jul 17, 2010
662
568
I really like knowing my drug dealing and trafficking women data is secure and that Apple is protecting me and hampering law enforcement.
 
Comment

soupcan

macrumors 6502a
Nov 21, 2014
725
2,926
Netherlands
For the US Government, 1789=1984.

Just noticed the words on the FBI badge—Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity. I could hardly think of less appropriate words for the FBI now.

I suggest they are replaced with Fecklessness, Balls-Up, Idiocy.
I like Federal Bureau of Incompetence more. Or Federal Bunch of Idiots.
 
Comment

RogerWilco

macrumors 6502a
Jul 29, 2011
758
1,245
I really like knowing my drung dealing and trafficking women data is secure and that Apple is protecting me and hampering law enforcement.
Did it ever occur to you that a technology capable of defeating encryption would allow "the authorities" to add any data they wanted to your device and then claim it was yours? This is how tyranny rolls.
 
Comment

PBRsg

macrumors 6502
Aug 12, 2014
331
585
FBI, DOJ have become synonymous with "Republicans" who always "think backwards, in reverse."

Last time I checked, the DOJ has operated under Obama for the last seven years, but don't let me interfere with your blatant left wing political bias.
[doublepost=1458084137][/doublepost]
This will end up in the Supreme Court. Apple will lose because Ginsberg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Kennedy don't respect individual rights. A tie vote reverts the case back to the appellate court decision. And to think a lot of people cheered when Scalia died, he would have probably sided with Apple.

The left wing Democrats are the real threats to personal freedom now. The two states that wanted a version of the iPhone that they could break into are the perpetually Democratic states of New York and California. I think the left has started to miss the old Soviet Union.
 
Last edited:
Comment

firewood

macrumors 604
Jul 29, 2003
7,890
1,154
Silicon Valley
Statements like this make me wonder if posters are deliberately postings lies to get equally crazy responses, or are they just that stupid and believe what they are saying.

Nowadays, when I see a post with such a deliberately incorrect statement, I immediately put them on my "Ignore" list, assuming there's a high likelihood that they are just some sort of paid troll. Not worth our time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ardent73
Comment

PBRsg

macrumors 6502
Aug 12, 2014
331
585
Statements like this make me wonder if posters are deliberately postings lies to get equally crazy responses, or are they just that stupid and believe what they are saying.

It's probably just one of those left wing nuts that believes that only moves to the left are considered moving forwards. They should go and experience North Korea for a while.
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.