Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually.... before you go down that route...

I expect companies to perform anonymous analysis on any data that is uploaded.

Data is valuable. That's a lot of reason why services are offered for free.
Doesn't really seem like that applies here.
 
what I find so amusing is that your cell phone provider has a log on all phone call you make and receive and missed, all text messege you send and receive. I know this because every month I look at my cell phone bill and it showed me every call and text that went thru my phone number. If the Goverment wanted to know who you are calling they can go to your cell provider and get the info. If you are that concerned then use 3rd party app's.
 
Anyone who uses iCloud to backup and restore already knows this. Anything you use your phone for is liable to be uploaded by *whoever* and it's best to assume this from the start.
 
Again, the syncing that Elcomsoft is referring to has nothing to do with iCloud Backup. It's completely separate. Your post is thus based on a false premise.

wasn't talking about Elcomsoft. I was supporting my statement of the UI complexity of adding a single switch as you suggested. try again.
 
I don't think this is an issue for 95% of the population but Apple should give users the option to disable this because for some people it could be important and for others they just would prefer it to not sync

Basically, I'm saying that just because it doesn't affect or bother me doesn't mean it doesn't affect or bother anyone and Apple should give users full control over what happens to their personal data if they really are serious about privacy.

Also, just because they are better on privacy than the competition, it doesn't mean they are perfect
 
Have you tried some things like disabling iCloud Drive (which apparently has an effect on this)?
Thanks for the tip, I did turn off Handoff, but haven't tried disabling iCloud Drive. Just turned it off, let's see if it works. (Although not ideal, because I do actually sometimes use iCloud Drive on my work phone)
 
Quite apart from security concerns, and in fairness this is really a separate issue, the whole syncing-calls-across-devices thing can get annoying pretty fast. Decided to replace my work-supplied Android phone with my old 5 when I got a 7, only to find calls from random numbers in the call logs on both devices (different contacts synced to each device).

This kind of semi-hidden functionality with no obvious way to disable it is a pain.
 
The whole problem is that apple has encryption keys. They DON'T NEED these yet they insist on keeping access.
Did Apple admit that they maintain encryption keys, or is this just you assuming that they must be doing that? Please share if you have any link showing Apple mentioning that they have encryption keys.
 
Did Apple admit that they maintain encryption keys, or is this just you assuming that they must be doing that? Please share if you have any link showing Apple mentioning that they have encryption keys.

Have a look here:

https://www.ft.com/content/cd295840-db6c-11e5-98fd-06d75973fe09

https://9to5mac.com/2016/02/25/appl...hone-security-to-counter-fbi-unlock-requests/

They're working on ways of eliminating the need to store the keys but haven't as yet done it
 
Have a look here:

https://www.ft.com/content/cd295840-db6c-11e5-98fd-06d75973fe09

https://9to5mac.com/2016/02/25/appl...hone-security-to-counter-fbi-unlock-requests/

They're working on ways of eliminating the need to store the keys but haven't as yet done it
"The New York Times and Financial Times are detailing that" is not the same as Apple admitting something. Last I heard from Apple on the issue was Tim Cook's letter http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/. In this letter, Apple claims that they did not give access to FBI, not because they did not want to (Cook mentions "When the FBI has requested data that’s in our possession, we have provided it"), but because they cannot ("Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system", i.e. a new iOS version that would either not use encryption or allow for encryption keys to be selectively given to the authorities).

I don't mean to say that you are wrong, you obviously could be right about this, but if you find Apple admitting they keep encryption keys, I honestly would like to know.
 
Last edited:
Wow, a very quick reply and to the point. However, "The New York Times and Financial Times are detailing that" is not the same as Apple admitting something. Last I heard from Apple on the issue was Tim Cook's letter http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/. In this letter, Apple claims that they did not give access to FBI, not because they did not want to (Cook mentions "When the FBI has requested data that’s in our possession, we have provided it"), but because they cannot ("Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system", i.e. a new iOS version that would either not use encryption or allow for encryption keys to be selectively given to the authorities).

I don't mean to say that you are wrong, you obviously could be right about this, but if you find Apple admitting they keep encryption keys, I honestly would like to know.

Tim Cook's reply is in relation to unlocking the iPhone itself (Apple had already provided iCloud backups to the FBI but they wanted to see if there was anything else on the phone).
 
Tim Cook's reply is in relation to unlocking the iPhone itself (Apple had already provided iCloud backups to the FBI but they wanted to see if there was anything else on the phone).
I'm sorry, that's the only relevant article that I could find that has anything coming directly from Apple (and not hearsay).
Anyway, back to the original statement that "apple has encryption keys. They DON'T NEED these yet they insist on keeping access", I guess you and/or 'arekm' are assuming that Apple does so (or basing your assumption on unofficial, non-Apple reports).
 
Last edited:
Anyway, back to your original statement that "apple has encryption keys. They DON'T NEED these yet they insist on keeping access", I guess you are assuming that Apple does so (or basing your assumption on unofficial, non-Apple reports).

That wasn't my statement ;)

My understanding is they do need them at the moment but are working on a way of providing all the functionality without the need to keep the keys

Also, this quote indicates that Apple do indeed currently have the ability to decrypt iCloud backups
As the government has confirmed, we’ve handed over all the data we have, including a backup of the iPhone in question. But now they have asked us for information we simply do not have.
From here: http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/answers/
 
That wasn't my statement ;)

My understanding is they do need them at the moment but are working on a way of providing all the functionality without the need to keep the keys

Also, this quote indicates that Apple do indeed currently have the ability to decrypt iCloud backups

From here: http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/answers/

Sorry about the misunderstanding, I actually realized my mistake moments after I wrote it (and edited the comment).

Also, your last explanation made sense to me, seems I was asking the wrong question :).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil A.
What Apple refused to do with their overpriced iAds, was to give advertisers any info on what target audiences were available and where. This made it impossible for merchants to figure out the best expenditure of ad money.

They said it was to prevent advertisers from reverse figuring out where people lived. More likely it was because they didn't want to reveal that their US ad viewing demographic choices were jobless teens or something similar.
There are plenty of markets focused around jobless teens, probably because some of them blow their allowances on useless stuff.
[doublepost=1479506263][/doublepost]
I've gotten iMessage spam, but nothing else (knock on wood). What specifically is happening?
I get a notification every day from some guy in China inviting me and many others to a calendar event saying "90% OFF BOOTS SALE" or whatever. It was happening last week but seems to have stopped now.
 
Last edited:
I have iCloud Drive disable and my call history always on my back ups so
Any bog-standard iCloud backup, way before iCloud Drive came along; saves contacts, SMS, call logs, settings, wallpaper and homescreen icon layout.
 
I get a notification every day from some guy in China inviting me and many others to a calendar event saying "90% OFF BOOTS SALE" or whatever. It was happening last week but seems to have stopped now.
Sounds like you missed out on a great sale on boots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sudo1996
Stuff like this gets on my nerves. For 99.99999999% of users this is an awesome convenience, but there's always that small group that is worried about muh privacee. Stuff like this is whats holding Siri back from the likes of Google Assistant because of the paranoia. I wish Apple would split it and have a basic Siri and AI data gathering like they do now and then a more advanced option that users can opt into to have a more useful assistant. Do I want them to go full Google and track every single thing I do? No, I'd love it if I could sync my health data and cards that are in Apple Pay in the Cloud and not have to set that crap up every single time I get a new phone or reset my phone. /rant

Privacy over simplicity every time
 
ok, this is going to far..... You can make a clear statement about privacy, but overstepping it is another matter.

we Mobile carriers hypercritically did controlled privacy behavior just as much as Apple we would also blame them for call log keeping as well

U can't win.. Either its privacy or security, but not both.....

The problem is we want it all.... and no trade-off's.. Kinda difficult to do... even Apple can't do it, yet still tells us on the basis of 'deferential privacy' This can only go so far, if we want more and more convenience..
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.