Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Mini 6 is the only LCD device with the A15 chip. So perhaps the display drivers used don’t have vsync? As the low latency OLED in the iPhone 13s just don’t need it…

The Mini 6 has pretty nice hardware, just needs dedicate software time from Apple!
 
Can anyone actually owning a Mini 6 confirm that when holding it upside down in portrait mode with the power button on the downside, the jelly scrolling effect is basically gone and opposed to the "regular" orientation with the power button up is not nearly as prominent. I can seriously say this for my Mini 6 for sure! Really strange!
 
The Jelly effect is actually a new feature to prevent people from looking at naughty pictures. Kinda like "Scrambled TV" in the 1980's and 1990's.
 

Attachments

  • Scrambled TV.jpg
    Scrambled TV.jpg
    55.6 KB · Views: 56
  • Haha
Reactions: MadeTheSwitch
welp...

I was so excited for an updated mini (and still might get it), but the battery life, jelly-ness, lack of pro-motion, and the price — might be enough to make we wait for another refresh. I replaced my iPad mini 2 with the 10.5" iPad Pro when it first came out and have loved the device, though I've missed the size of the mini.

There are no solutions. Only tradeoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
When will Apple learn..

1. Apple screws up some piece of hardware
2. Customers complain
3. Apple denies it's a problem
4. Class action lawsuit
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadeTheSwitch
Can anyone actually owning a Mini 6 confirm that when holding it upside down in portrait mode with the power button on the downside, the jelly scrolling effect is basically gone and opposed to the "regular" orientation with the power button up is not nearly as prominent. I can seriously say this for my Mini 6 for sure! Really strange!
It does the same thing, only the slant goes the opposite way.
 
I see it in either portrait orientation. To those that do not have a mini 6, this is not a 60Hz refresh issue thats something different, this is an obvious wave shape to the data on the display as you scroll. My non technical wife simply describes it as waves that make her feel a bit sea sick looking at it. Refresh rate will cause text to see doubled or slightly blurred with fast scrolling. That we can ignore because we understand what that is. The effect being covered here is a very obvious lag in one side of the screen as you scroll the page and its seen at nearly any scroll speed. I did not see this on my mini 5 and have not seen it on other devices but maybe one of the early iPads we had. Strange thing is, the effect is not visible in landscape. If this were an LCD issue, we would see it in both orientations. I just hope there is a fix in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidako
I see it in either portrait orientation. To those that do not have a mini 6, this is not a 60Hz refresh issue thats something different, this is an obvious wave shape to the data on the display as you scroll. My non technical wife simply describes it as waves that make her feel a bit sea sick looking at it. Refresh rate will cause text to see doubled or slightly blurred with fast scrolling. That we can ignore because we understand what that is. The effect being covered here is a very obvious lag in one side of the screen as you scroll the page and its seen at nearly any scroll speed. I did not see this on my mini 5 and have not seen it on other devices but maybe one of the early iPads we had. Strange thing is, the effect is not visible in landscape. If this were an LCD issue, we would see it in both orientations. I just hope there is a fix in the future.

It is an LCD issue. It wasn’t on the mini 5 because Apple prioritised portrait mode on that. For the mini 6 they have prioritised landscape mode. Combined with the lower resolution in width this means the mini 6 is practically unusable in portrait mode whereas the mini 5 was practically perfect for portrait mode.
 
It is an LCD issue. It wasn’t on the mini 5 because Apple prioritised portrait mode on that. For the mini 6 they have prioritised landscape mode. Combined with the lower resolution in width this means the mini 6 is practically unusable in portrait mode whereas the mini 5 was practically perfect for portrait mode.
Unusable? Thats a stretch. It works perfectly fine unless you intentionally scroll up and down fast. No one can read that fast anyway.
 
Unusable? Thats a stretch. It works perfectly fine unless you intentionally scroll up and down fast. No one can read that fast anyway.

Jelly scrolling appears for any scrolling speed. In fact it’s a bit worse for slower scrolling because fast scrolling blurs everything anyway.

I have used the mini 5 for 2 years and had to return the mini 6 in less than a week because of how disorientating the jelly scrolling was.

The mini 5 is one of my favourite devices ever so for me the mini 6 is the most disappointing device ever.

Maybe other people can use it. But for me it was sickening.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
It is an LCD issue. It wasn’t on the mini 5 because Apple prioritised portrait mode on that. For the mini 6 they have prioritised landscape mode. Combined with the lower resolution in width this means the mini 6 is practically unusable in portrait mode whereas the mini 5 was practically perfect for portrait mode.

Indeed. And here’s the issue: if Apple were going to prioritise landscape mode on the 6th Gen iPad Mini, why wasn’t this reflected by their marketing and retail departments.

- When you visit then Apple Store splash page for the Mini the first thing you see is the new Mini shown in… portrait.
- When you go to buy the product from anywhere (Amazon, Apple,etc) the device is shown in…portrait.
- When iJustine (Youtuber) interviewed Tim Cook the other day he showed her the new Mini and was holding it in… portrait .
- If you go into a retail store the new Minis are all laid out in…portrait.

It beggars belief.
 
Indeed. And here’s the issue: if Apple were going to prioritise landscape mode on the 6th Gen iPad Mini, why wasn’t this reflected by their marketing and retail departments.

- When you visit then Apple Store splash page for the Mini the first thing you see is the new Mini shown in… portrait.
- When you go to buy the product from anywhere (Amazon, Apple,etc) the device is shown in…portrait.
- When iJustine (Youtuber) interviewed Tim Cook the other day he showed her the new Mini and was holding it in… portrait .
- If you go into a retail store the new Minis are all laid out in…portrait.

It beggars belief.

It’s absolutely insane. Unless Tim Cook specifically gave permission for this decision to increase profit margins then not one but multiple people should be fired; the engineer that proposed this design, the supervisor that signed off on that design, and the QA workers that tested the design.
 
I dont get why apple did not prioritize portrait, I bet if the effect was in landscape people would be less fussed about it.
 
I dont get why apple did not prioritize portrait, I bet if the effect was in landscape people would be less fussed about it.
I know I would Be much less bothered yes.

Maybe this could be a future configuration opotion for the Mini, alongside storage options, etc. Do you want your Jelly Scroll in Portrait of Landscape? 😂
 
Never seen this happen on my iPad Pro.

The explanation is strange just because of the way displays work. To avoid this kind of behavior we use double buffering and vertical sync for decades now.
You paint in one buffer while the other buffer is displayed. The swap of both buffers happens in something that we used to call the „vertical blank interrupt“ when we had crt monitors - basically it is just a vertical sync. Imagine it as
- display refresh finished
- swap buffers
- display refresh finished
- swap buffers
tbc ….

Screen tearing only appears if you swap buffers during a display refresh. So this seems to be an odd behavior/ odd explanation of Apple. Under normal circumstances a display refresh is invisible to the human eye.
This isn't screen tearing, and is unrelated to buffers. The display itself has no buffer, and it can update the state of each pixel only sequentially, one pixel at a time. The graphics hardware sends a stream of pixel data to the display, and the display updates the state of the LCD pixels accordingly. That happens in a line-by-line scanning process, and each pixel is updated once per frame. The buffers on the GPU side ensure that during each such frame update, the display is updated with a consistent image, i.e. no tearing. But the update itself still causes a gradual state transition across the screen from one frame contents to the next, because the screen state can't flip instantly. In addition, the physical LCD pixels take some time to actually change their color in reaction to the state change (pixel response time). The color doesn't flip instantly, but "slowly" fades from the previous color to the new color.

In combination, this causes the display to look as in the photo below (when scrolling). You can see that the pixels are updated from left to right, with the "fading" effect created by the pixel response time. In motion, the human eye perceives the horizontal lines as slanted/skewed, because it merges the upper lines fading in on the right with the lower lines fading out on the left. (I'm not sure if it would be better or worse with a faster or slower response time. A faster response time may actually make it worse.)

1632844285859.png
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.