If Macbook M1 Pro will get it, it would be another reason to upgrade to AirPods Pro 2
. It has indeed the same BCM_4387 chip.
I think the biggest thing here for me personally is the storage component. While streaming services negate most of the concern, for people (like me) who don't rely on streaming and would rather store files locally, I'm not ready to take the monetary plunge to upgrade the capacity just to have all of my hi-res music with me at all times.Well, if it did take lossless files, you wouldn't have to down convert, if you have enough storage that is. More about convenience for some people.
I don't use lossless audio files, but I can sort of understand. Back in the day, I used to rip my DVDs to high bitrate h.264 video files. People told me it was stupid because a lot of portable hardware wouldn't be able to play back those files, and even many Macs had problems (since hardware h.264 decode was a new thing). Well, I said I'd just wanted to have it one and done. Rip it in excellent quality and let the technology and storage capacities improve to compensate... which happened pretty quickly. That was in the DVD era. Now nobody thinks twice about downloading 4K movies to their iPads.
That requires a "forced upgrade".So my 16' MBP (M1 Max) laptop has the BCM_4387 bluetooth chipset... does this mean that my MBP all of a sudden supports 5.3 too?
View attachment 2227485
There is more money to be made by forcing 16" customers to upgrade to a newer 16". Sales are slumpin.Lol. So even though the M1 generation has the same Broadcom chip and is capable of 5.3, Apple decided to solely provide the new FW to the M2 Air?
Is there any practical difference that can be observed when using Bluetooth 5.3 vs 5.0 in macOS? Seems like it’s a minor update for mostly very specific use cases.
Note that the Magic Mouse, Magic Trackpad and Magic Keyboard are all Bluetooth 3.0 so I doubt they can make any use of improved features.
After looking at the 4387, I took a look at the 4378, that's in my 2020 M1 MacBook Air. The first revision supports Bluetooth 5.1 and the second supports 5.3.Apparently the bluetooth module in the 13" MBA was always capable of 5.3, it just needed a firmware revision. So I don't think this is due to a hardware change.
Stolen info from another thread: The Broadcom 4387 (BCM_4387) which is the chip in all M2 MBAs does now support Bluetooth 5.3: https://device.report/broadcom/bcm4387
I had same thoughts. Wondered why they might skimp there. Glad to see it’s rectified.This is incredible news! I bought my M2 Air last year on launch day and thought that bluetooth 5.0 was the only real shortcoming. If they are now enabling 5.3 through a firmware I'm totally over the moon.
Both the Bluetooth version and Wifi version are part of the technical specification Apple provides on their website.
In my opinion, Lossless audio is snake oil. I'm an audio engineer, multi-instrumentalist with perfect pitch, pro audio gear, and I really can't tell the difference between a lossless file and a high quality MP3 or AAC file. People around me who thought they could tell the difference always failed in blind tests. If you can tell the difference in a blind test, I'd be curious to know.
No, he means audition. The word has meanings beyond a trial performanceThat 'audition' term must be a typo. I would imagine it's Audio technician? But that doesn't really add up either in context. Hmm. But the prefect pitch thing is commendable. Must help![]()
No, he means audition. The word has meanings beyond a trial performance
Yes, I meant “sense of hearing”, but I realized it is considered archaic. I’m not a native English speaker.No, he means audition. The word has meanings beyond a trial performance
Lol. So even though the M1 generation has the same Broadcom chip and is capable of 5.3, Apple decided to solely provide the new FW to the M2 Air?
The text you quoted literally says that Apple updated the Air tech specs page to reflect this change. How is this "(...) without any mention of this in product materials...".Customers are rightfully upset when Apple is not forthcoming about what they are buying
Single NAND chips instead of two, leading to much slower SSD speeds…
Wi-Fi 6, rather than 6E, when ALL other Mac computers have the newer improved version…
BlueTooth 5, rather then the newer 5.3, without any mention of this in product materials…
Interesting you mention that, I have a Time Capsule which hardware-wise is supposed to be identical to AirPort Extreme. So, it still works fine, but I only use it for backups since it can't handle connection speeds past 100 Mbps - and I have 400 Mbps at home. Am I doing something wrong? When I run Speedtest the difference between the Time Capsule and a cheap, basic router but released in 2020's is so obvious. One thing though, the TC is updated to the latest firmware available, I wonder if that could be the culprit.I'm still on WiFi 5 / 802.11ac, using a bunch of Apple AirPort Extremes connected via a wired Gigabit Ethernet backbone. I think I'll stick with this as long as realistically possible. Current Apple devices still work beautifully with these, even roaming from AirPort Extreme to AirPort Extreme. For most home use I have not seen the need to go beyond a few hundred Mbps over WiFi, and furthermore, my home internet access maxes out at 500 Mbps anyway. (However, my main work machine is a desktop which is hardwired via Ethernet.)
Depends on which model and how far you are from the unit. I might get speeds anywhere from say 50 Mbps to 550 Mbps. Here is a test on my iPhone from close by.Interesting you mention that, I have a Time Capsule which hardware-wise is supposed to be identical to AirPort Extreme. So, it still works fine, but I only use it for backups since it can't handle connection speeds past 100 Mbps - and I have 400 Mbps at home. Am I doing something wrong? When I run Speedtest the difference between the Time Capsule and a cheap, basic router but released in 2020's is so obvious. One thing though, the TC is updated to the latest firmware available, I wonder if that could be the culprit.
Right! How is it that all of these newer routers are so buggy?!?? My AC Extreme served me well for a long time but had struggled with all of the smart devices I added to my network when stuck at home in 2020 with nothing to do but buy things with government checks. So I bought an ASUS ZenMax Wi-Fi 6 pair and had so many problems but it would happen spontaneously because of software updates. Turned that to manual once I got a good update but then there are security updates and things have slowly gotten better over time.we have got a bunch of airports, ac extreme, express and n extreme.
all showing their age for sure with 10 devices connected.
went back to these though due to buggy google wifi!
Kind of like how the chip in the HomePod mini always had temperature and humidity sensor built in and was later activated in an update.Apparently the bluetooth module in the 13" MBA was always capable of 5.3, it just needed a firmware revision. So I don't think this is due to a hardware change.
Stolen info from another thread: The Broadcom 4387 (BCM_4387) which is the chip in all M2 MBAs does now support Bluetooth 5.3: https://device.report/broadcom/bcm4387