I feel like they really dropped the ball by not making this an S year. Magsafe seems pretty half-baked at this point and the compromises they've made to include 5G aren't helping either.
I’ve been looking into wireless converters for CarPlay. The newer ones seem to be pretty good, it’s an extra $130, but cheaper than a new car. But also something we don’t have to worry about until Apple removes the port all together.Lucky for you, but for those of us with wired CarPlay (like my Audi A4), wireless charging is worthless in the car (unless you have wireless CarPlay like some newer cars).
100% agree. Maybe it reduces the carbon foot print for apple but not the world. Im still waiting for charging while you move on Apple Watch. Maybe even solar. Common apple!!!!! The technology is out thereThe single most specious argument against MagSafe.
The single most specious argument against MagSafe.
I agree, but if you are streaming Netflix on your TV or Netflix on your phone the streaming energy costs will not be noticeably different.I think that has to be questioned. You could well be right, especially with some of the monster televisions around these days. But the program has to be squirted from a server somewhere, through numerous hops - possibly round the world - even via satellite, including your router, and a wifi hop - just for you. Add all that up compared with broadcast television signals.
Someone, somewhere, has surely counted it all up.
Most likely depends if it is used as a traditional overnight charger, or if power users are using it to charge constantlySure if people are that careless with cables
Hahaha. What a desperate ad.In spite of the almost daily stories about minor downsides to MagSafe, I'm loving mine. Stuck in place with double sided tape, it makes the perfect charging/storage solution in my car. I just tuck the phone under the arm rest, and rely on wireless CarPlay for the trip knowing my battery will be in a good state on arrival.
LOL. Whats "all this stuff"?Unbelievable. I have to buy all this stuff for hundreds of dollars more and it charges 3W less. So greedy. Epic Games forever.
I think you're underestimating people's willingness to freak the hell out about something incredibly trivial.This backlash could have easily been avoided if they were more transparent in the keynote. They could have said it like this
“MagSafe offers faster wireless charging. Up to 12 watts on the mini and up to 15 watts on the larger iPhones!”
MagSafe charging sounds marginally more convenient than plugging in a cable, but I'm not sure I understand the point.
Qi chargers, I understand. You lay the phone down on the charger when you're not using it, and if you make a habit of this your phone is frequently being topped off. It's a one-handed operation that requires less attention than using two hands to plug in a cable. And when Magsafe first came out I thought the idea was much the same but with magnets making alignment easier... But it turns out that the Magsafe charger is supposed to stay on the phone.
At that point, what's the real advantage? You still have to use two hands to disconnect it, and if you want to use it while charging you can, but there's still a cable attached, but now it has a chunky and expensive and energy-inefficient puck riding along as well.
I guess if anyone gets around to designing a heavy/fixed base version of Magsafe, that would make sense. One-handed connection and disconnection, and in a car mount you could eliminate fiddly clamps and attach and charge your phone in one go. (I see Belkin is selling a $40 car mount, but it doesn't charge the phone)
I don’t think this will be an issue. We have had conductors in the the smart keyboards for years and those are opened and closed several times a day and I’ve never heard of anyone having issues. I’d imagine this is following the same sort of construction more or less.My only concern with the Mag charger is the bend points. It's going to last a few months then the connector at the base of the disk will break. It needs a stronger neck to resist repeated bending or removal.
What!? I take it you have special “issues”? 🙄Hahaha. What a desperate ad.
Have you heard of lighting cables having issues? Because the magsafe charger has the same attachment as the lightning charger. It's going to be bent because people will put their hands between the cable and the phone.I don’t think this will be an issue. We have had conductors in the the smart keyboards for years and those are opened and closed several times a day and I’ve never heard of anyone having issues. I’d imagine this is following the same sort of construction more or less.
One of the more appealing parts to me is easy attaching. I regularly plug and unplug my phone when I'm in bed and I hate fumbling in the dark trying to get the lightning connector to go in. I like the idea of being able to quickly attach a charger and continue using my phone.MagSafe charging sounds marginally more convenient than plugging in a cable, but I'm not sure I understand the point.
Qi chargers, I understand. You lay the phone down on the charger when you're not using it, and if you make a habit of this your phone is frequently being topped off. It's a one-handed operation that requires less attention than using two hands to plug in a cable. And when Magsafe first came out I thought the idea was much the same but with magnets making alignment easier... But it turns out that the Magsafe charger is supposed to stay on the phone.
At that point, what's the real advantage? You still have to use two hands to disconnect it, and if you want to use it while charging you can, but there's still a cable attached, but now it has a chunky and expensive and energy-inefficient puck riding along as well.
I guess if anyone gets around to designing a heavy/fixed base version of Magsafe, that would make sense. One-handed connection and disconnection, and in a car mount you could eliminate fiddly clamps and attach and charge your phone in one go. (I see Belkin is selling a $40 car mount, but it doesn't charge the phone)
One of the more appealing parts to me is easy attaching. I regularly plug and unplug my phone when I'm in bed and I hate fumbling in the dark trying to get the lightning connector to go in. I like the idea of being able to quickly attach a charger and continue using my phone.
Decent charging speeds are still kind of a must to make that worthwhile over wired charging. I can't say disconnecting has ever been an issue for me, whether one-handed or two.
I've had occasional issues with cables too. But I've also on countless occasions come back to my phone to find it got jostled or misaligned on the qi charger and has not charged at all. I am using the "puck" style ones, so I guess the more cradle-y options would be better for this.I use qi precisely because lighting isn't reliable. Just watching a movie the phone buzzes over and over as it enters into charging mode. I get that the cable wears out, but with wireless charging that never happens.
They will make for 25% longer charging times.I couldn't care less about the magsafe charger, but what practical difference will 3 fewer watts make anyway?
I've had occasional issues with cables too. But I've also on countless occasions come back to my phone to find it got jostled or misaligned on the qi charger and has not charged at all. I am using the "puck" style ones, so I guess the more cradle-y options would be better for this.