Buying a phone on a contract isn't a sale, it's more like a lease. I genuinely hope you're just being difficult and don't really believe what you're arguing.A sale, is a sale is a sale. Right?
Buying a phone on a contract isn't a sale, it's more like a lease. I genuinely hope you're just being difficult and don't really believe what you're arguing.A sale, is a sale is a sale. Right?
Not arguing the merits of buying phones on contract or not, as that is an individual judgement call. All I am suggesting is the based on t&c the phone can be for the price stated above.Buying a phone on a contract isn't a sale, it's more like a lease. I genuinely hope you're just being difficult and don't really believe what you're arguing.
Precisely my point. Thanks.well if you are right about airpower, the answer to not being able design it so a phone could be dropped anywhere on it, is to use magnets and ensure you can only put it in one plac
So if I offered you a phone for $1 upfront that locked you into a $1000/day contract for 50 years, you'd still say the phone could be bought for a dollar?Not arguing the merits of buying phones on contract or not, as that is an individual judgement call. All I am suggesting is the based on t&c the phone can be for the price stated above.
Would you rather overheat the battery? That’s what kills battery capacity, and can shorten its life drastically.They will make for 25% longer charging times.
‘And you can get that 3w extra for only $4.99 a month!’3W upgrade purchased separately
Except that not is even close to the stated situation.So if I offered you a phone for $1 that locked you into a $1000/day contract for 50 years, you'd still say the phone could be bought for a dollar?
The point I'm making isn't that phone contracts are evil or people who but them are idiots, I'm just saying that you can't consider the upfront carrier price without taking into account the rest of the deal.
Every day I become more confused about why anyone would want to use this charger 🤔
It's an exaggerated example to prove a point. While the numbers are more extreme, the factors to consider are essentially the same; a lower initial price paid for by guaranteed future income that more than exceeds the upfront discount. This is the fundamental formula of carrier subsidies and it's exactly why buying phones on a contract is usually more expensive than buying a device and service separately.Except that not is even close to the stated situation.
Buying a phone on a contract isn't a sale, it's more like a lease. I genuinely hope you're just being difficult and don't really believe what you're arguing.
I'm not making any judgement, I just did the math (that's my thing).Would you rather overheat the battery? That’s what kills battery capacity, and can shorten its life drastically.
I'm not sure I follow - do they let you unlock your phone to accept other SIMs, or do they release you from your contract (i.e., you can throw away your SIM and not pay them a cent more after 60 days).You aren't locked into contracts anymore. Verizon lets you unlock a phone after 60 days, as long as the phone is paid off and you aren't past due on your bill. Not sure what the other's policies are but probably similar.
thanks for the link, direct quote from it:![]()
Oppo's new 125W charging tech takes you from 0 to 100% in just 20 minutes
Oppo has just unveiled its insanely fast 125W charging technology that will take future smartphone just 20 minutes to go from 0 to 100% battery.9to5google.com
There are many variables and unless one does an all-in inclusive analysis over a few years, one won't know. Want to volunteer?It's an exaggerated example to prove a point. While the numbers are more extreme, the factors to consider are essentially the same; a lower initial price paid for by guaranteed future income that more than exceeds the upfront discount. This is the fundamental formula of carrier subsidies and it's exactly why buying phones on a contract is usually more expensive than buying a device and service separately.
Volunteer what? I'm not going to hold your hand because you don't understand why carriers offer discounts. You can look into the numbers yourself, it's fairly easy math.There are many variables and unless one does an all-in inclusive analysis over a few years, one won't know. Want to volunteer?
Also...thanks for the link, direct quote from it:
"While this is impressive to say the least, real-world speeds will likely vary slightly. It’s also worth noting that no currently available Oppo smartphones — or other OEM devices for that matter — will be able to take advantage of the crazy fast charge speeds. "
Heard it will be included in Apple One Max, launching in March...‘And you can get that 3w extra for only $4.99 a month!’
‘We’ve calculated that plugging in a lightening cable to an iPhone burns an extra 0.095 kilocalories compared to using MagSafe.For sure not easily. On the other hand, I was blessed being born with two hands, making plugging in a Lightning cable into my iPhone trivial.
For example, you can by a Verizon iPhone 12 for $799, pay for two months of service through Verizon, and then get it unlocked and cancel service with Verizon. You are then free to use it with the wireless provider of your choice.I'm not sure I follow - do they let you unlock your phone to accept other SIMs, or do they release you from your contract (i.e., you can throw away your SIM and not pay them a cent more after 60 days).
true, they said now they are more or less sameThe single most specious argument against MagSafe.
In other words, what you said are just some generalities and until you can't really prove your original statement unless an analysis is completed. And additionally is does not appear you actually researched all of the facts.Volunteer what? I'm not going to hold your hand because you don't understand why carriers offer discounts. You can look into the numbers yourself, it's fairly easy math.
You can say whatever you like, it won't make you right.In other words, what you said are just some generalities and until you can't really prove your original statement unless an analysis is completed. And additionally is does not appear you actually researched all of the facts.
I think the MagSafe charger uses USB C. I would be surprised if it was lightning especially since it requires a USB C power delivery charger. Even so Ive never heard of anyone personally bending the lightning connector, usually when people have lightning issues its the cable pulling out of the connector due to improper handling.Have you heard of lighting cables having issues? Because the magsafe charger has the same attachment as the lightning charger. It's going to be bent because people will put their hands between the cable and the phone.
For me MagSafe solves the problem that eventually the lighting contacts stop working, but it retains the poor connection that is susceptible to issues when it bends.
Ditto.You can say whatever you like, it won't make you right.