I agree 100% and remember that not only Apple has this dilemma but all manufacturers who used the bad 8600m in them. I truly think this is the worst scam I have ever remembered seeing in the industry this widespread. Nvidia is ultimately going to be up the creek over this no matter what they do.
In the end the fiasco is nothing short of ridiculous.
By that point, it was probably too late for the aluminum MacBooks to be redesigned. If they even could be--I don't think Intel or ATI has on-the-fly chipset switching yet.Still not sure why Apple did not dump Nvidia but continued to use them after they finally fessed up in July (Nvidia knew about it long before then).
By that point, it was probably too late for the aluminum MacBooks to be redesigned. If they even could be--I don't think Intel or ATI has on-the-fly chipset switching yet.
So true. That's why Nvidia offered up the $200 million for repairs - that was getting off lightly. Still not sure why Apple did not dump Nvidia but continued to use them after they finally fessed up in July (Nvidia knew about it long before then).
Was it because Nvidia offered them such a great deal? Because otherwise, if Apple pulled out due to this mess, their name would have really been worthless.
But the bottom line for us, is no one is telling when the faulty 8600 gpus stopped. Having read somewhere that Nvidia was renaming the 8600s, my wild guess is that any gpu named 8600 (and as we know even some others) have the faulty soldering issue. Think about it - if you did fix the issue and continue to make the otherwise same gpu, wouldn't you rename it too?
From reports here, boards that haven't failed yet, but aren't noticeably different otherwise. It may be that their chips had a different manufacturing process, but there's no publicly-known indicator of that.When someone turns in an "early" 08 mbp (pre Oct 14) mpb where the 8600 gpu failed, what are they replacing them with?
From reports here, boards that haven't failed yet, but aren't noticeably different otherwise. It may be that their chips had a different manufacturing process, but there's no publicly-known indicator of that.
(you can't see the second menubar so well in this one but it's there underneath, slightly offset)
So if you buy a refurb 2.5GHz Classic MBP now with 512MB 8600GT will it have the newer board or still the ticking time bomb one?
Do you mean a second dock? I see a ghost of your dock, but not of the menu bar. That is indeed weird and probably counts as "scrambled video", but I'm not so sure. Here is a gallery of screen shots of machines with the GPU problem.
It could have either. You wouldn't know unless you could look up the serial number to see when it was manufactured.
Do you mean a second dock? I see a ghost of your dock, but not of the menu bar. That is indeed weird and probably counts as "scrambled video", but I'm not so sure. Here is a gallery of screen shots of machines with the GPU problem.
If the problem still exists, then why on earth are Apple still selling it in the 17" MacBook Pros? All it is doing is costing them more money to fix them when they break. Also the 8600s must still be in manufacturing process because where will they get them from for the 17" MBPs? So they must have been fixed or Apple will have broken the contract between them already.
As long as they're replacing the entire logic board while doing the GPU replacements (which they more or less have to do--I doubt they're going to replace individual chips on the board!), that shouldn't be possible.Of course that makes me wonder if the broken GPU didn't damage something in the computer that will make replacements be more likely to fail.
Well, that's what any rational person would assume, but there are a couple of people on Apple Discussions and at least one here who had an October replacement GPU fail almost immediately. Of course that makes me wonder if the broken GPU didn't damage something in the computer that will make replacements be more likely to fail.
There is a second menubar too, better seen in other screengrabs I can't be bothered uploading right now.
After the above post I considered it could be a Leopard bug but I can't find any other occurences of it, plus the weeks old Safari page appearing on screen is just plain weird.
My confidence in it is shot and I'm not looking forward to a full Erase and Install just on the off-chance something in my Install is corrupted but I guess I have no choice![]()
I'll give it a week or two to see if it reoccurs or exhibits different symptoms.
He probably got a replacement GPU from the bad batch before the new ones were replaced in that store. I hope so anyway![]()
All the 8600s are ticking time bombs. This desire to believe that some are somehow better is just wishful thinking.
What temperature does the solder become weak at?
But the 17" MBPs have the 8600 in them, if they were faulty and both Apple and Nvidia know, there could well be a lot of law suites against them BOTH. Also what does w/ mean lol?
From what I've been reading in the past 10 minutes in order to try and give you a specific answer, it's not so much one temperature but rather high-lead solder (which apparently is what Nvidia was using) is prone to cyclic failure, that is it weakens over time with large temperature changes. Laptops typically get powered up/down many more times than a desktop part, so this makes them more susceptible in general to such stresses. Increased fan output can help, but from what I've read, many believe that will only delay the problem, perhaps outside a warranty period so manufacturers don't have to take responsibility for the problem. Too bad the chips are likely surface-mount or one could resolder the chips relatively easily with higher grade stuff and then forget about it.
What I don't understand is why Nvidia, once they discovered the root of the problem, didn't immediately simply switch the solder they were using to lower lead or no-load solder and then newer batches would be without the problem (some comments from Nvidia seem to indicate they DID do that, but 3rd party articles poo poo everything Nvidia says and declares them ALL faulty, suggesting Nvidia preferred to HIDE the problem and keep on turning out bad batches. The question becomes which is true?) If the problem is in all the batches, Nvidia SHOULD be forced to offer higher quality solder replacements for all units, IMO. Extending a warranty will not fix the root problem. If, however, some batches did have better solder, they should release the information about which batches contain the fix. Otherwise, I would assume they're all bad since it makes no sense for them to hide the good batches.