I did buy 64 GB. Had Apple started their line up at 32 GB, I could have saved $100.
Why do you think they would have sold a 32GB for $100 less than last years 32 GB? Is the 6 16GB $100 less than than last years 16GB?
I did buy 64 GB. Had Apple started their line up at 32 GB, I could have saved $100.
It seems openly consumer-hostile.
Not because it forces everyone who would have been happy with 32GB to pay the extra $100 for the 64GB - those people, like myself, have always paid the extra $100 for the mid-tier storage model anyway, so Apple isn't getting an "extra" $100 to pad their margins, they're protecting existing margins from users (like me) who would have gone with the base model for the first time instead of automatically choosing the mid-tier.
No, it's consumer-hostile because 16GB isn't a viable amount of storage for anyone except grandmas and enterprise users. When your available storage on that device out of the box is only 12 GB and an iOS update requires almost half of that, it's a problem.
Ultimately it comes down to an argument of demographics: if you think that the majority of iPad owners are grandmas and enterprise users (using them primarily for email and web), 16GB makes total sense. If you don't, then it's a giant ******* you to your customer base and Gruber is absolutely right in calling Apple out.
Without knowing the demographics, we can't know for certain one way or the other.
As the "Apple Guy" around my friends, I've never had more people come to me trouble updating their iPhones to iOS 8 due to space limitations. Yes, a majority of them are 16GB entry iPhones.
The issue is 16 GB iPhone is really a 12GB iPhone. And when you want to update, you need at least 2-4 GBs free. So, you can't use more than 8GBs of your "16 GB" iPhone if you want to update. I don't want to rely on iTunes to update my iPhone. Neither does anyone else.
Either way any spins it, it is bad customer experience for Apple. They're a company that differentiates themselves on customer experience with "it just works". For John Gruber, a definite Apple fanboy, to admit this means that it is an issue.
Someone has to say it:
Storagegate.
I swear. The iPhone 6 has more people bitching about perceived shortcomings, paranoia, Apple screwing people over, manufacturing processes, materials used in construction, cost of device, shortages, scalpers, colors, not enough ram, etc. more than any Apple product ever made.
Just one more thing that people are going to bitch about.
Tune in for tomorrow's bitch.
Someone has to say it:
Storagegate.
I swear. The iPhone 6 has more people bitching about perceived shortcomings, paranoia, Apple screwing people over, manufacturing processes, materials used in construction, cost of device, shortages, scalpers, colors, not enough ram, etc. more than any Apple product ever made.
Just one more thing that people are going to bitch about.
Tune in for tomorrow's bitch.
Why do you think they would have sold a 32GB for $100 less than last years 32 GB? Is the 6 16GB $100 less than than last years 16GB?
You'd be shocked by how many people want the 16gb and lower price. A lot of people stream all their content and would be pissed if Apple didn't sell this size.
32gb is about the right size for me. But I ordered 128gb just cause.
I'm betting that if there were an entry level 32GB iPhone...
People would be whining about having to pay more for a 32GB, when they only need a 16GB, and could, I guess, pay $100 less?
It seems openly consumer-hostile.
Not because it forces everyone who would have been happy with 32GB to pay the extra $100 for the 64GB - those people, like myself, have always paid the extra $100 for the mid-tier storage model anyway, so Apple isn't getting an "extra" $100 to pad their margins, they're protecting existing margins from users (like me) who would have gone with the base model for the first time instead of automatically choosing the mid-tier.
No, it's consumer-hostile because 16GB isn't a viable amount of storage for anyone except grandmas and enterprise users. When your available storage on that device out of the box is only 12 GB and an iOS update requires almost half of that, it's a problem.
Ultimately it comes down to an argument of demographics: if you think that the majority of iPad owners are grandmas and enterprise users (using them primarily for email and web), 16GB makes total sense. If you don't, then it's a giant ******* you to your customer base and Gruber is absolutely right in calling Apple out.
Without knowing the demographics, we can't know for certain one way or the other.
As someone who does nothing but stream music and back up pictures and videos after the weekend, what's all the fuss about?
And wtf is an "entry level" iPhone? A joke, I hope.
Buy it to fit your lifestyle. My 16gb rocks!