Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
TL;DR

Let me put it like this. Just as a company's ethics are worthless, their claims to "fully encrypt" user data are just as worthless. The only value claiming to be "fully encrypted" is when it's independently verified and audited. Let me see the white paper which fully details and discloses any cloud vendor's claims to encryption. Without checks and validation a cloud vendor's assertions on anything are irrelevant.

Point me to Apple's auditing and white papers on this then we can talk further.


[doublepost=1467819645][/doublepost]

I trust no company. Everybody is a liar until they prove they are not by independent auditing. Companies and their employees do dumb ass things to get around compliance by not disclosing it. You are kidding yourself if you think otherwise. Remember, audit, audit, audit. The only way to keep companies honest.

Actually I don't have to find their white paper or audit trail, these are compliance laws put forth by the Government, not abiding by these could put them under. You really should look up HIPAA, FERPA, FIPS, and PCI-DSS before you start asking me for a source. Also there is a federal requirement that all business that make over x number of dollars have to have an audit done yearly, as the profits go up, this may become quarterly. In dealing with customer data, they are also required to have security audits performed (penetration tests) done on a regular schedule to ensure compliance. Such as SOC 2 and SSA compliance.

I don't think you understand the fact that Apple provides encryption to user submitted data based on a law that tells them they have to. They aren't just saying this. It would put them out of business to be hit by a lawsuit that big, and I think the recent case with the locked iPhone states that they go above and beyond with user privacy in mind.

Also to be compliant in most of these compliance laws, the organization MUST have an external auditor. They can perform as many internal audits as they want to be proactive but none of that matters when they are up for review.

Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, and Ebay all have to do this. (just naming a few for example) What services they offer depend on what compliance laws they have to be externally audited for.

And I'm sorry that my post was too long for you, I spent the time to write it, you can read it. Personally I feel as though if you can't take the time to read something that long then you shouldn't have any business posting about how you don't trust a company, because it means you haven't taken the time to actually try to understand how compliance laws protect you.
 
Last edited:
Really? That's kind of a relief if true. You didn't by any chance install an updated airport card did you? :)

Actually I did, and I even considered it might work because of this (Quikertek or something) but I though that doesn't affect bluetooth?
[doublepost=1467825019][/doublepost]
So do I take it from your posts here we developers no longer have NDA's regarding 10.12 beta? I haven't read the docs recently.

As everybody can read the beta posts in the developer forum without signing up, they can't take it too seriously.
 
So I re paired the watch now and the check mark is back but Bluetooth is intermittent. Sometimes it shows that my Mac is connected (the three dots over the Bluetooth logo) but it doesn't stay for very long. Still haven't been able to unlock my Mac. I'm using a 2016 MacBook.

I did the same, repaired the watch and the marking in secruity for auto login was on. When I started the computer after it said that is autologin with Apple Watch, but then it suddenly stop. So it seems like a little bug there, but hopefully in beta 3 it would be more seamlessly ;)
 
Actually I did, and I even considered it might work because of this (Quikertek or something) but I though that doesn't affect bluetooth?
[doublepost=1467825019][/doublepost]

As everybody can read the beta posts in the developer forum without signing up, they can't take it too seriously.

This is interesting. I have an early 2013 Mac and I couldn't get it to work despite following everything on the dev notes. I'm hoping as time goes on, we'll get better clarification. It shouldn't be limited to just 2013, the first generation Retinas should also be included as their network cards are virtually the same
 
Actually I did, and I even considered it might work because of this (Quikertek or something) but I though that doesn't affect bluetooth?

Interesting. I bet that is it. That looks like just a rebranded airport card from a 2013+ rMBP. I have ordered an updated card and should get it tomorrow. I'm curious to see if that works. If so, maybe it has something to do with 802.11ac. Because the bluetooth should be identical. Or it's just an arbitrary limit by Apple.

Also, the airport card includes both wifi and bluetooth.
 
Are iCloud tabs in macOS working for anyone else in Safari? It works fine on my iOS devices (on iOS 10 beta 2) and they can see my macOS safari tabs, but not the other way around. Is it just me?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.